It could be the cause, I don't know.for all other similar entries the religion is written between ""
should it causes the issue ?
(shouldn't they be muslim in fact ?)
And yeah, they should of course have a Muslim CoA, not a Pagan one.
It could be the cause, I don't know.for all other similar entries the religion is written between ""
should it causes the issue ?
(shouldn't they be muslim in fact ?)
It could be the cause, I don't know.
And yeah, they should of course have a Muslim CoA, not a Pagan one.
well base character sheet is common to everyone^^ but I think I will add some specific tweaks. (that oak tree in the background of the dynastic part of the tab is an example).
I don't quite like how his age looks like a button. Anything else round with the exception of traits are clickable.here is a testing^^
![]()
here is a testing^^
yeps removed.I don't quite like how his age looks like a button. Anything else round with the exception of traits are clickable.
Looking good, but is there a way to keep Slavs and others from getting Norse style CoAs now that they are randomized?
Looking good, but is there a way to keep Slavs and others from getting Norse style CoAs now that they are randomized?
Mongols already use a separate set but i didn't work on it yet^^Having the Mongols to have their own CoAs would be good too, but I'm not sure if this is possible without separating these religions.
Mongols already use a separate set but i didn't work on it yet^^
It's possible without separating the religions?
yes we can now use separate sets for each religion instead of religion_groups^^
tengri pagan have their own set, west african pagan as well, but aztec are in the same coa group as norse![]()
So, with the new 1.101 version, is this compatible straight out of the box or shall we have to wait for an update?