-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I have no idea what tonka is doing and proposing an unconventional team before the cards were resolved make me want to reject this.
Please try and keep your votes on a separate line to other stuff, they are easy to miss otherwise.
For the record, since I didn't say this when I posted my private vote: I approved this team because I was on it myself. With just two players on it it was a good chance for me to learn what side Cliges was on.
Also, tamius had a point when he said always rejecting the first team is counterproductive.
Why not just put yourself on it?
We both did, of course.
Actually, you are a better target. You're the only person next to me or Cliges that isn't Tonka himself. And establishing a chain of trust is what we want..
But that point is moot now.
That helps us very little when it comes to forming the next team, doesn't it?
Also, tamius had a point when he said always rejecting the first team is counterproductive.
Why not just put yourself on it?
We both did, of course.
Actually, you are a better target. You're the only person next to me or Cliges that isn't Tonka himself. And establishing a chain of trust is what we want..
But that point is moot now.
That helps us very little when it comes to forming the next team, doesn't it?
Approve
I don't like the letters! I still maintain we should get numbers based on first time playing Resistance.
EDIT: and I think that means I'm #3.
I don't like the letters! I still maintain we should get numbers based on first time playing Resistance.
EDIT: and I think that means I'm #3.
Spy.
There is no way this can work from a resistance perspective. I'm resistance, and there are three spies in the six other players. Hence, >=1 of the four players in tonka's team plus tonka are spies.
Since I strongly, strongly doubt Spy-Tonka would propose an all-Resistance team (especially when down a mission; it's just throwing the game away) most likely Tonka is a badly mistaken Resistance player who wants the spies to equalise, or a spy who has put a spy-mate in his team. And I reckon it's the latter.
I urge all true Resistance members to REJECT the team and I have done so myself, after explaining this to jpr for some odd reason.
Since Kingepyon and esemesas play rarely to never anymore, I move everyone be bumped up two spots.
Now I am #1.
Now I am #1.
Oh. Right. Forgot to change my vote. To change it do I do werewolf style?
Unapprove Reject
Unapprove Reject
Wait, do you think I'm a spy cuz I didn't put myself on the team? I've done that every game I've played so far, so I figured if I didn't I would be immediately accused of being a spy.
also I've yet to receive a answer on why Glio wanted me to give you OC, do you have an answer to that?
Tamius and I are both resistance. Since there are 4 resistance this game that means you, Cliges and Randy can not all be resistance. So this team cannot be trusted
I think you're a spy because you
a) have a spy on your team, meaning the team mustn't pass or
b) you have no spies on your team, making you a particularly stupid spy.
Of this I am certain. Seven players is too small not to put yourself on the team.
Give me OC so I could have aedan's/TNT's role checked and report back? No, I don't quite understand why I ought to have an answer for that.
Well thats assuming that you and Tamius are resistance, which is unproven, we have one win right now, if we get another here the game will be essentially finalized with us winning, in other other words I honestly think more info will come about with this team passing then with it failing I mean right?
Yes, but if this team passes, and there are no spies on it, it makes you a spy, and one who has deliberately given the resistance a two-nil lead.