I'm not trying to portray as wrong, in the sense the outcome was correct. But the poster seemed remarkable calm and assured about the fact that is was something he'd say.You're wrong to try to portray the original as a fake.
Still, I'm willing to say that was probably, 80% likely, genuine. If I came across the way you said (and I think I actually did), I went too far.
But as an actual method for finding wolves? It is both incredibly inefficient* and also lowers the tone of discussion from interesting deductive analysis to everyone voting someone for using the wrong fucking word. If nothing else it bores me to tears.
*Mercifully inefficient, since that's the opposite of ruthless?