Werewolf Lite CCLXXXI: Alexander and the Werelephants

[Rysz]

Let nobody doubt I was in the JL.

I didn't doubt that when you contacted me. But I did pass the information to my fellow wolves immediately, but kept the hunt on Kiwi. Changing it to you at that moment would have been a death sentence, and now I got some credit as someone who saved the JL.

Did you only suspect me today?

 

[Ithvan]

Stt. Laat de GM het eindigen.

Sorry for gloating. But I think this is the first WWL I won which wasn't pure luck.


Great game, everyone, and as always thanks for GM'ing, Cliges.

 

[Gen. Skobelev]

Thanks to the GM, even though I subbed in for only one day.

I must say the amount of non-voters is quite alarming. Makes it hard to get decent game going on if people miss votes all around and need to be subbed out (with subs not even turning up in the worst cases).

 

[THE_SPLIT]

Wait Falc is listed being the winner despite doing absolutely nothing?

 

[Gen. Skobelev]

Wait Falc is listed being the winner despite doing absolutely nothing?

He subbed in on the last day to the winning team. Besides, who cares about sub wins?


edit: and support for what Rysz said about keeping it quiet and waiting for GM. Always rewarding for spectators and especially for GM to wait for proper conclusion.

 

[Cliges]

In a way, everyone's a winner.

In another...well, search me. It was an odd and confusing game. I'll let all the wolves claim victory. Even if he voted, nothing would have changed.

EDIT:
But from now on if one side is on the brink of winning, we should be sure to arrange it so that Split is prepared to sub in on that last day.

 

[THE_SPLIT]

He subbed in on the last day to the winning team. Besides, who cares about sub wins?


edit: and support for what Rysz said about keeping it quiet and waiting for GM. Always rewarding for spectators and especially for GM to wait for proper conclusion.

Umm the issue is that we already had a precedent when someone was not declared a winner for doing exactly the same thing...... so we can not really have it both ways

 

[Rysz]

He subbed in on the last day to the winning team. Besides, who cares about sub wins?


edit: and support for what Rysz said about keeping it quiet and waiting for GM. Always rewarding for spectators and especially for GM to wait for proper conclusion.

Falc had good luck and Skobie had less. But it could as easily have been otherwise. And some people care about wins, some don't. Although I'm glad I won this game, it doesn't feel quite as good as my other wolf win (see my sig) (where btw Split was my fellow victorious wolf )

GM's have the right to conclude the game, and especially if they make good night updates.

Thanks Cliges for hosting, and thanks for my fellow wolves for letting me try to get the seer (which I eventually did )

 

[THE_SPLIT]

Besides, who cares about sub wins?


.

Everyone always counted subs as winners....

 

[Gen. Skobelev]

Everyone always counted subs as winners....

Back in the day there was distinction as sub wins wasn't really seen as "real" win.

 

[THE_SPLIT]

Back in the day there was distinction as sub wins wasn't really seen as "real" win.

I believe hdk's count includes subs in wins..

 

[Rysz]

Umm the issue is that we already had a precedent when someone was not declared a winner for doing exactly the same thing...... so we can not really have it both ways

If you are referring to the previous game. I had no objection that anyone subbed into the winning team near the end of the game. My point was about the information integrity in the game.
Falc was lynched this game, did not every claim he had any inside information, nor would he have been suspected of this. That being said, it appears he was scanned. Although the seer was already dead, he could provide more information about the validity of Arkasas' JL claim. I personally would not have let him sub in, but as said before, I'm quite strict on that.

 

[Gen. Skobelev]

I believe hdk's count includes subs in wins..

Could be, I haven't checked. I just remember that in after game discussions there used to be distinction between sub win and "proper" win. And even then some liked to count sub wins into their totals while others didn't count sub wins.


edit:

Umm the issue is that we already had a precedent when someone was not declared a winner for doing exactly the same thing...... so we can not really have it both ways

I'm not quite sure why this was directed at me, I don't really have any idea what you are referring here. If you mean last game, you were counted in the (sub) victory crew there as you can see yourself.

 

[Rysz]

Could be, I haven't checked. I just remember that in after game discussions there used to be distinction between sub win and "proper" win. And even then some liked to count sub wins into their totals while others didn't count sub wins.

The distinction is also still in my sig, where I also give credit to those who I subbed.

 

[THE_SPLIT]

why this was directed at me.

It is not.... I just need to know if FALC should be added to here http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showthread.php?736626-Werewolf-Lite-Hall-of-Fame

 

[PanzerCorps]

I'm not quite sure why this was directed at me, I don't really have any idea what you are referring here. If you mean last game, you were counted in the (sub) victory crew there as you can see yourself.

I think I know what he's speaking about. Give me a min and I'll provide a link. Makes for some fairly interesting reading I think.

 

[PanzerCorps]

Here: http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showthread.php?737373-Werewolf-Lite-CCLXXIII-Purgatory/page1

Read it all if you can but if not skip to after the day 3 update.

 

[Cliges]

Do I get to make the call here?

Ask Falc if he wants it. If he does, he's a winner.

If not, it goes to the strongest. Or something.

 

[Falc]

It is not.... I just need to know if FALC should be added to here http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showthread.php?736626-Werewolf-Lite-Hall-of-Fame

As far as I'm concerned, the answer is no

 

[Cliges]

There you have it. The man has spoken.