When will the gamebreaking bugs that result from having a non-absolute-agnatic merchant republic be fixed?
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
But then they are not using it? Why "The Roman Empire" creation has "always=no" and is createable only via decisions? It is a violation of their same interface!
The only motivation I could imagine that all that "completely_controls" would have needed a scroll bar to be shown (and no scroll bar is previsted in the title creation screen).
I imagine that the "on_action" thing is more efficient right that use "gain_title"?
The difference between gain_title and on_title_creation is that gain_title is title specific. On_title_creation could use a single event for multiple titles, or even entire cultures, religions, etc. Every event in the on_title_creation on_action will be called whenever a title is created, causing all the events that have their trigger fulfilled to happen.
- 1
So this could used for example for "coronation" events? A Christian Emperor is crown from the Pope and Muslim from the Caliph (it is historical? Or the Muslim crowned themselves?), a Roman Emperor from the Senate and The People of Rome and so on... interesting!
I ran that petition about that some months ago and the answer then was a sad no :C
Succession laws are hardcoded (read modifing them would broke the code irremediably)... we need to wait CK3 for have them at this point...
But could be overwritten using events but it is a little ugly to see.
But could be overwritten using events but it is a little ugly to see.
The best we could get are new succession laws in the code
If you're curious, here is a list of succession laws people would like to see in game: http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showthread.php?741234-A-collection-of-requested-succession-types
Captain, the logical outcome of these changes is to make a lot of people on the forum happy. I raise one fascinating eyebrow.
Why hasn't this been addressed yet? This bug needed to be fixed six months ago, but instead it's been left unaddressed and, in fact, made worse.
This thread, and Gar's job, is not about fixing bugs. There is a bug report forum specifically for that.
I've submitted it to the bug reports forum repeatedly for months. It's been ignored, and most replies have suggested that this is because it only becomes relevant after modding.
What will set_graphical_culture do? Will it change the "etnicity" (appearance) of a character? And if so, how?
I presume it's going to work exactly like it sounds: you can define the cultural ethnicity of a character, most likely when you're spawning a character via "create_character" events or generated via history entry.
Normally, it wouldn't make sense for this to be an event effect (i.e. change someone from African tribesman to a blonde Northman), but I suppose there's no harm in allowing it to happen in fantasy/magical contexts.
It could also be used to make sure a certain child is born of the same ethnicity as their father or mother.
- 1
It could be used for spawning children in a cycle like in the avatar mod in which has someone spwan from a different nation each time.
Last edited:
- 1
I figured White Walkers had something to do with that request...
So, uh, about that bug with female succession in republics. It'd be really nice for modders if that was fixed.