• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
At the moment I think the most likely spies are Marty, Panzer and one of Cliges and Alxeu. I'm not particularly sure about it, but it's enough to make me unhappy with the team.

Voting through PM.
 
NAY: tamius
AYE: the rest

MadChemist does not use the staff.

Mission is SUCCESSFUL

Next leader is Madchemist again, team of 5, 2 sabotages required.
 
Ok, so everyone on the team is cleared, we just need to choose correctly from the rest. Panzer and Marty are obviously out, and I'm really thinking Tonka's the last spy. So that leaves Alphabet Soup or I for the last team. I'd obviously prefer myself, but I think Alphabet's probably resistance.
 
Did we decide that that team required two sabotages in the end? I'm struggling to work out why all the spies approved it.
 
Did we decide that that team required two sabotages in the end? I'm struggling to work out why all the spies approved it.

Nope normal team next two need two though so doesn't matter who we choose we pretty much win unless merlin gets picked
 
Alright everybody! We did it! Let's turn this thing around.
 
Hooray! I say we add either me or aedan as the fifth. I personally would prefer me to be on the team, but if you guys like aedan more, he seems trustworthy enough to get the last spot.
 
it doesn't matter who we add as long as we dont' give them the staff everything will work out as panzer and marty are the spies with either me, alphabet, or aedan being the third, and the next two missions need two sabotages so essentially we've won minus the merlin thing...
 
itRtKmRmhuQrn.gif
 
Did falc ever confirm that the last mission required 2 sabotages?

GM ANNOUNCEMENT

Game will continue as scheduled for now. Mission 3 is go, needs 4 people and one single sabotage. Resistance needs to score this one or they lose the game.

If they do lose, I'll start a new game to make up for this one :happy:

Because this is the last said on it.
 
He said this, but yeah he never confirmed what'd he do

Further consideration leads me to believe this may not be ideal. Unless the spies manage to get two people to go on one of these missions, they'll just choose to support. The result would be that we quickly end up at mission 5 with the resistance having no more clues as to who the spies are than they do now. Food for thought...

Require two sabotages for missions 4 and 5 instead? Force spies to sabotage if they're on a double-sabotage mission?
 
Fantastic! I was a little nervous there, but it's good to see everything work out in the end.

This mission is guaranteed so long as we put the four known goodies on it and give one the staff, so I'll make it easy for everyone.

Proposal:
madchemist
tamius23 (+staff)
alxeu
Cliges
AsdfeZxcas

As for the fifth mission: I recommend we just play it completely as normal. If we make 4 and 5 require 2 sabotages, then the game's already over except for the assassination phase, unless a spy went undercover for no reason on mission 3. I guess making it 6 people requiring 2 sabotages is a possibility, but I think that's an undue burden on the spies. If one of them has managed to appear innocent for this long, then kudos to them, and they deserve this one.
 
well, no reason to not approve this team.

approve
 
Approve

pretty much what aedan said
 
Fantastic! I was a little nervous there, but it's good to see everything work out in the end.

This mission is guaranteed so long as we put the four known goodies on it and give one the staff, so I'll make it easy for everyone.

Proposal:
madchemist
tamius23 (+staff)
alxeu
Cliges
AsdfeZxcas

As for the fifth mission: I recommend we just play it completely as normal. If we make 4 and 5 require 2 sabotages, then the game's already over except for the assassination phase, unless a spy went undercover for no reason on mission 3. I guess making it 6 people requiring 2 sabotages is a possibility, but I think that's an undue burden on the spies. If one of them has managed to appear innocent for this long, then kudos to them, and they deserve this one.
This is an interesting proposal. I'm definitely feeling a lot of strengths to it, but at the same there potential pitfalls that we need to be looking to prevent against. I think this is a balanced team, one that has a lot of strength in depth and I can certainly see why you picked it, and we will certainly consider this as a definite option as we go forward. As of this moment it's hard to give a definite answer on what final direction we will strive to aim for, but you will certainly be a part of that process.
 
Accept

Victory is within out grasp... just can hope that merlin is not revealed.