At the moment I think the most likely spies are Marty, Panzer and one of Cliges and Alxeu. I'm not particularly sure about it, but it's enough to make me unhappy with the team.
Voting through PM.
Voting through PM.
Did we decide that that team required two sabotages in the end? I'm struggling to work out why all the spies approved it.
GM ANNOUNCEMENT
Game will continue as scheduled for now. Mission 3 is go, needs 4 people and one single sabotage. Resistance needs to score this one or they lose the game.
If they do lose, I'll start a new game to make up for this one :happy:
Further consideration leads me to believe this may not be ideal. Unless the spies manage to get two people to go on one of these missions, they'll just choose to support. The result would be that we quickly end up at mission 5 with the resistance having no more clues as to who the spies are than they do now. Food for thought...
Require two sabotages for missions 4 and 5 instead? Force spies to sabotage if they're on a double-sabotage mission?
This is an interesting proposal. I'm definitely feeling a lot of strengths to it, but at the same there potential pitfalls that we need to be looking to prevent against. I think this is a balanced team, one that has a lot of strength in depth and I can certainly see why you picked it, and we will certainly consider this as a definite option as we go forward. As of this moment it's hard to give a definite answer on what final direction we will strive to aim for, but you will certainly be a part of that process.Fantastic! I was a little nervous there, but it's good to see everything work out in the end.
This mission is guaranteed so long as we put the four known goodies on it and give one the staff, so I'll make it easy for everyone.
Proposal:
madchemist
tamius23 (+staff)
alxeu
Cliges
AsdfeZxcas
As for the fifth mission: I recommend we just play it completely as normal. If we make 4 and 5 require 2 sabotages, then the game's already over except for the assassination phase, unless a spy went undercover for no reason on mission 3. I guess making it 6 people requiring 2 sabotages is a possibility, but I think that's an undue burden on the spies. If one of them has managed to appear innocent for this long, then kudos to them, and they deserve this one.