"It is hard to write the history of the British Isles in these years as anything other than a success story."
~ Jonathan Clark, From Restoration to Reform
Appendix I
Who can sit in Parliament? Who sits in each house?
In general terms, commoners sit in the Commons and lords sit in the Lords. In other words, anyone who holds a peerage in the Peerage of England as a substantive title is eligible to sit in the Lords; anyone else is eligible to be elected to the Commons – with the notable exception of serving military personnel and members of the Royal Household. MPs (so those sitting in the Commons) must also be solvent and have attained their majority. In theory, there is no limit on the number of people who can sit in the Lords – though a practical lack of space often mandates otherwise. Additionally, the 26 most senior bishops in England sit in the Lords as Lords Spiritual. The bishops of Canterbury, York, Durham, London and Winchester are always represented in the Lords, with the remaining 21 seats decided by the length of time for which one has been a bishop. Lords Spiritual are not peers, but rather "Lords of Parliament".
If anyone has any questions as to where their character would sit, or any other aspects of the Houses of Parliament, please do not hesitate to ask and I will do my best to answer.
Appendix II
Who can sit in the Cabinet? Which positions make up the Cabinet? What does each minister do?
There are no rules or restrictions about who may be a Cabinet minister, or which offices must be included in Cabinet meetings. The Cabinet is fluid and can adapt to the political climate. In 1690, ministers admitted to the cabinet were as follows:
First Lord of the Treasury – Head of the Treasury Commission, and therefore ultimately responsible for the development and execution of financial policy, working to formulate it in tandem with his deputy, the Chancellor of the Exchequer.
Lord Keeper – More fully the Lord Keeper of the Great Seal, he is in charge of the execution of all duties relating to the Great Seal of England; namely, all actions requiring monarchical approval. This includes granting letters patent and royal assent, other ecclesiastical and ministerial appointments, and summoning and dissolving Parliament. In effect, the post is a sinecure. Usually a peer, though not necessarily so.
Lord President of the Council – The presiding officer of the Privy Council – a body with a quorum of three. This is another de facto sinecure.
Lord Privy Seal – The Lord Keeper of the Privy Seal serves a similar, though even less vital, function to the Lord Keeper. He is in charge of all duties related to the function of the monarch's personal seal. A nominal sinecure.
Lord Steward – More fully the Lord Steward of the Household, he is responsible for the management of the royal household – including travel and finances, which he oversees as head of the Board of Green Cloth. He is always a member of the Lords and the government.
Lord Chamberlain – The Lord Chamberlain of the Household is the monarch's liaison with the House of Lords, and is also responsible for regulating court dress and organising royal ceremonies. He is always sworn of the Privy Council and usually a peer.
Master of the Horse – In charge of all matters relating to the royal stables, kennels and coach-houses, the Master of the Horse is always a member of the ministry, sworn of the Privy Council and by convention a peer.
Southern Secretary – The more senior of the two Secretaries of State, the Southern Secretary is responsible for the administration of the south of England, Wales, Ireland and the American colonies. He also oversees relations with Roman Catholic and Islamic nations of Europe.
Northern Secretary – The junior partner to the Southern Secretary, the Northern Secretary is responsible for the administration of the north of England, as well as relations with the Protestant states of Northern Europe.
Chancellor of the Exchequer – The Second Lord of the Treasury, he is the controller of the Exchequer – the account into which is held all national receipts are paid – and as such responsible for making payments and collecting revenue on behalf of the sovereign. He is generally a member of the Commons – often one of the most influential Commons ministers – though his own importance is dependent largely on his status within his party, and he is overshadowed by his superior: the First Lord of the Treasury.
In addition, the following positions are occasionally made part of the cabinet council:
Master-General of the Ordnance – Often a serving general, he heads the Ordnance and is therefore responsible for the administration and outfitting of the British Army. Not usually in the cabinet before the 18th century, but almost always a serving general.
Lord High Admiral – The head of the Admiralty Commission, whose purpose is to oversee the administration of the Royal Navy. The office is seldom out of commission, though can be in the cabinet when it is. Almost always a naval officer.
Archbishop of Canterbury – The Primate of England and the primus inter pares within the Anglican Church. Appointed by the monarch, serving at their leisure. Not usually political, though often sworn of the Privy Council. Ex officio member of the Lords as a Lord Spiritual.
Comptroller of the Household – The deputy to The Lord Steward, the Comptroller assists in the execution of the duties of the royal household. Serves at the pleasure of the monarch.
First Lord of Trade – Head of the Board of Trade, responsible for promoting trade both at home and abroad. Dormant until reestablishment of the board in 1696.
Paymaster of the Forces – Responsible for the financing of the British Army. Seldom a political post, and rarely sworn of the Privy Council before the 18th century, at which point it became a highly-valued political prize owing to the usual talent of its holders for greatly enriching themselves during their service.
At this point in time, the monarch will also sit in Cabinet meetings and is very much involved in government. Ministers all serve at their pleasure, and they can attempt to influence policy in their appointments. These will usually be used to ensure no person or faction becomes too powerful, though this is not always the case; everyone has favourites. Should a monarch feel one office is becoming too important, it can be placed "in commission". This means it is exercised vicariously by a commission of ministers – for example, the First Lord of the Treasury is head of the Treasury Commission, which replaced the dormant role of Lord Treasurer. That is not to say the commission is permanent…
Appendix III
Who are the main factions? Who supports each one? How stable are they?
At this point, the two main factions are the Whigs and the Tories. The Whigs are supporters of a limited monarchy and tolerance for dissenters, though not Catholics. Their support is derived mainly from the towns and cities (or "boroughs") and includes both the country's biggest landowners and the monied interest. The Tories are the party of the landed gentry, supportive of a stronger monarch (in some cases, adhering to the principle of Divine Right) and highly protective of the Anglican Church against all recusants. They tend to be more supportive of the Stuarts, though being anti-Catholic are no more likely to favour Jacobitism than anyone else. Their support comes predominantly from the country and the established gentry.
Both groupings, however, are loose. In reality, labels are more often applied by others than by self-identification and the majority of parliamentarians simply cooperate when it suits their aims, disbanding when it doesn't. A large minority of members of parliament will be truly independent, though that is not to say neutral.
Transecting this divide is that between the so-called Court and Country parties. This is easier to distinguish: those supportive of the ministry are by definition members of the Court Party, and those against the ministry members of the Country Party. This isn't too important at the game's start, but will become more so as things progress.
If you are uncertain as to which faction your character would likely belong, please don't hesitate to ask.
Appendix IV
What benefits come with playing a Commoner? What benefits come with playing a Lord?
Fundamentally, it comes down to personal preference. I've tried to refrain from making either the Lords or the Commons more appealing to play, and in order to have a balanced game a healthy number in both houses is good. Nevertheless, at the beginning of the game the Lords will have more power, and are also likely to make up the greater portion of governments. In addition, members of the Lords will be able to hold a certain amount of power over the composition of the Commons owing to their status as magnates and landowners, therefore able to control so-called "pocket boroughs", where the electorate is small enough that it is "in the pocket" of the local grandee. This will work out in the following manner:
Barons and viscounts will control one seat each.
Earls will control two seats.
Marquesses will control three seats.
Dukes will control four seats.
Note however that I am imposing a rule on character creation in that fictional peers may be earls at most; we will start with no player-controlled marquesses or dukes, reflective of the very small number around in 1690. Historical dukes and marquesses may be allowed should I feel them necessary for the narrative.
In the Commons, any baronets will also control one seat to reflect their status as a member of the landed gentry.
To counter this influence of the Lords over the Commons, members of the Commons who achieve political note will be considered even more influential than a peers who do the same. This is designed to reflect the historical public affection for "Great Commoners", as well as recognising the skill required to succeed in a world largely dominated by peers.
Otherwise, practical roles and abilities of all characters are the same.
Appendix V
What is the Privy Council? Who are Privy Counsellors?
The Privy Council is a ceremonial organisation whose de jure function is to advise the monarch. In reality, it is seldom convened and its duties have largely been superseded by the monarch's ministers. This is shown most obviously in the fact that all ministers of the crown are usually sworn of the Privy Council, if not already a privy counsellor, upon their assumption of office. To be sworn of the council, one need only hold a cabinet position. Alternatively, worthies can be sworn of the council by the monarch as a reward for good service. Members of the council are entitled to the use of the post-nominals P.C., and will generally command a greater deal of influence in Parliament than ordinary members.
Appendix VI
Some general advice on titles, styled and forms of address
Most of the time, titles and styles will not be an issue. Nevertheless, it's always helpful to use the correct form and goes a long way to increasing that much sought-after quality of these games: immersion. So as to keep this from turning into a massive section, which it has the potential to do, I will instead yield to Debrett's, whose advice can be found here.
Nevertheless, keep in mind that Westminster is a courteous place. It is tradition that members of the Commons never refer to each other by name, but rather in the third person via the Speaker. For example, if I were talking about a backbencher I would refer to him as "The Honourable Member for Nonplace". If he were a PC, however, the form "The Right Honourable Member for Nonplace" would be used. Where someone holds an office, this is used, for example: "The Right Honourable First Lord of the Treasury".
In the Lords, people are addressed as per social convention; if I were addressing a peer up to and including the rank of marquess I would refer to "The Lord Nonplace". If he were a duke, the form "The Duke of Nonplace" would instead be used. On a similar note, all British titles come with some sort of designation. Therefore, it would be "Reginald Jeeves, 1st Earl of Worcester" as opposed to "Earl Reginald Jeeves (of Worcester)". The exception is royal princes who also hold titles, as well as their spouses. For example, "Prince Reginald of Worcester" would be correct, and his (hypothetical) wife would be "Princess Reginald of Worcester".
Appendix VII
Some general advice on the designation of privacy
In line with the recent practice in such games as these in giving players the option of conducting business in the thread in private, such a mechanic will be implemented in this game. Generally, if one wishes for something to be private, then one need simply to designate it such via some clear indication that the post is private – preferably by placing some warning at the top of the relevant post. Should one wish to open one's business up to others, one need only include such people by name when designating privacy. For example, if I were corresponding with both Francis Urquhart, and The Lord Bilsborough with regards to some intrigue or other, I might deploy the following header to any letters:
Private – Mr. Francis Urquhart, MP; The Lord Bilsborough
The contents of the letter would then be considered known only to Urquhart, Bilsborough and me. Others would be free to read it, but could not consider their characters as knowing anything about the letter.
If a player wished to express wider sympathies by way of a private post, he is perfectly entitled to indicate such. In such cases, I will consider that no specifics of the letter or post are known, but well-founded rumours exist as to the author's views on a subject. For example, if Urquhart wished to subtly leak his ambitions to secure the premiership, he might write a detailed letter to any co-conspirators as to how he would achieve his aims; what would be known to his colleagues would be that he has ambitions of securing higher office.
~ ~ ~
I'll add more to this section as people request, or as I think of new things to note. If anyone has any questions about procedure or custom of any sort, I will do my utmost to provide a satisfactory answer. As a general rule, Wikipedia is more than sufficient for most queries.