Would be one of the shortest subs in WW history.Deadline late by 10 min again( busy). @EUROO7 did not vote and will be subbed out
Sorry for hunting you; had I known Skobie would sub out I would have hunted him. As it was there were only veterans left among the villagers so I had to hunt one and having no idea of the seer I just let the standing order stand---which reminds me that IG did a mistake. MC was next on the standing; not you aedan. So complain to IG; hadn't he made that mistake you would have lived and MC died.So both the Lite and the Big end the day after I get hunted in a victory for my side. Well good game.
had I known Skobie would sub out
I had to hunt a veteran and since I had no clue as to who were seer I let the standing order choose who died---and IG then made a mistake and had us hunt aedan and not MC who was next on the standing. Had I known you would sub out I would have hunted you instead of one of the other veterans. Though I probably should have taken you out anyway due to how many times your role was subbed; it just got ridiculous when it was subbed for the 3rd time. Actually wasn't there something about GMs autolynching roles which sub multiple times in lites?Eh?
Congrats to the winners. And indeed GM did good job here.
Why were you subbed in then?The point I was trying to make was how could I sub out when I wasn't playing in the first place.
Why were you subbed in then?
I think people have been subbed twice in lites before; though it is problematic and I believe some GMs do autolynch the second time a lite role needs a sub; though that is problematic too.IG, as he is apparently acronymed, decided that Skobie had technically been subbed in and then immediately subbed out; something contrary to traditional subbing procedures, in where someone who refused to sub in is not counted as having subbed in.
Anyway. My apologies for completely forgetting to vote the other day. If the thread so desires it and tradition permits it, I am open to not officially counting Caesar's win.