• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
VOTECOUNT (19 HOURS TO DEADLINE)

Gen. Marshall: 2
aedan777 [508]
k-59 [516]

Velasco: 1
LatinKaiser [507]

LatinKaiser: 1
Velasco [509]


k-59: 1
EURO [520]

Not Voted: 2
Hazbot
Gen. Marshall
 
Well, I don't know what to do. I think k-59 is so blatant a wolf that it hurts to see this village suffer so. But no one else seems to be on the side of righteous courage.

Vote k-59

Would you mind making a case on him, if he's so blatant a wolf? IMO Lemeard being a villager clears him somewhat, even though I did find him suspicious.
 
FOR THIS DAY ONLY, DEADLINE HAS BEEN PUSHED FORWARD TO 23:00 GMT (ONE HOUR AHEAD). ALL SUCCEEDING DEADLINES WILL BE THE SAME. AGAIN, TODAY'S DEADLINE WILL BE 23:00 GMT, ONE HOUR AHEAD OF THE NORMAL DEADLINE. MY APOLOGIES FOR THE INCONVENIENCE.
 
FOR THIS DAY ONLY, DEADLINE HAS BEEN PUSHED FORWARD TO 23:00 GMT (ONE HOUR AHEAD). ALL SUCCEEDING DEADLINES WILL BE THE SAME. AGAIN, TODAY'S DEADLINE WILL BE 23:00 GMT, ONE HOUR AHEAD OF THE NORMAL DEADLINE. MY APOLOGIES FOR THE INCONVENIENCE.
When you advertise it this late you actually only can move it if everybody votes before deadline and understands it is moved.
 
This is becoming a habit. IMO it's still preferable to keep the deadline as is and just give the votecount and update an hour later. It doesn't confuse people and the day can continue as is. Noone has died or suffered irreversible trauma (afaik) from not getting an immediate update.
 
When you advertise it this late you actually only can move it if everybody votes before deadline and understands it is moved.
It's up to the GM to decide what he can and cannot do. Of course he may harshly criticized for it later, but it still his decision to make.
This is becoming a habit. IMO it's still preferable to keep the deadline as is and just give the votecount and update an hour later. It doesn't confuse people and the day can continue as is. Noone has died or suffered irreversible trauma (afaik) from not getting an immediate update.
I'm assuming since he is moving it up that means it would be impossible for him to update for sometime after the normal update which is a problem.
 
The earliest I'd be able to update is 23:00 GMT.
 
*sigh*

Even Lemeard realized that I'm not a werewolf, just stupid, and that was after I was a driving factor in getting him lynched. Aedan, you of all people should realize this too. You're not an idiot villager like most of the rabble here so please just review the case on me and you'll realize it's crap.

k59, Hazbot, your votes are just extremely lazy. k59's vote is just a revenge vote and Hazbot's reason is pure BS. Cases made by me were against Lemeard, k-59 and Myoon. Enough people agreed with my case against Lemeard that he got lynched, so that couldn't have been a poor case at the time. Everyone agreed with my case on Myoon, but despite being part (together with aedan) of the initial case against him I warned you about the bandwagon and still didn't vote for him.

In fact Hazbot's reason to vote for me is so mindbogglingly retarded that I will vote for him if he gains traction. Other than that I tend to agree with the case on Velasco.
 
*sigh*

Even Lemeard realized that I'm not a werewolf, just stupid, and that was after I was a driving factor in getting him lynched. Aedan, you of all people should realize this too. You're not an idiot villager like most of the rabble here so please just review the case on me and you'll realize it's crap.

k59, Hazbot, your votes are just extremely lazy. k59's vote is just a revenge vote and Hazbot's reason is pure BS. Cases made by me were against Lemeard, k-59 and Myoon. Enough people agreed with my case against Lemeard that he got lynched, so that couldn't have been a poor case at the time. Everyone agreed with my case on Myoon, but despite being part (together with aedan) of the initial case against him I warned you about the bandwagon and still didn't vote for him.

In fact Hazbot's reason to vote for me is so mindbogglingly retarded that I will vote for him if he gains traction. Other than that I tend to agree with the case on Velasco.
Wait are you trying to defend your self??? Protip: saying how you built cases on villagers doesn't make you less lynchable.
 
Wait are you trying to defend your self??? Protip: saying how you built cases on villagers doesn't make you less lynchable.

Then what am I supposed to say? I did build cases on two villagers and one unknown. After all I didn't know their roles so obviously I make mistakes. My point is they were far from stupid cases, otherwise two of them wouldn't have gotten lynched, and otherwise most of the people alive now wouldn't have voted along with me. By Hazbot's reasoning we could run up more than half of the current village.
 
Then what am I supposed to say? I did build cases on two villagers and one unknown. After all I didn't know their roles so obviously I make mistakes. My point is they were far from stupid cases, otherwise two of them wouldn't have gotten lynched, and otherwise most of the people alive now wouldn't have voted along with me. By Hazbot's reasoning we could run up more than half of the current village.
So if everybody jumped off a cliff that wouldn't be a stupid thing to do.
 
So if everybody jumped off a cliff that wouldn't be a stupid thing to do.

Which is a false analogy. Lemeard was suspicious and lots of people agreed with me. Myoon was very suspicious, obviously, and I even dissuaded people from voting for him because I started to realize that he was an idiot villager. Dissuading people from jumping, by your false analogy.

Now I'd be silly to claim that these things clear me but to use them as an argument that I'd be a wolf would be extremely lazy to the point where it's wolfish.
 
Which is a false analogy. Lemeard was suspicious and lots of people agreed with me. Myoon was very suspicious, obviously, and I even dissuaded people from voting for him because I started to realize that he was an idiot villager. Dissuading people from jumping, by your false analogy.

Now I'd be silly to claim that these things clear me but to use them as an argument that I'd be a wolf would be extremely lazy to the point where it's wolfish.
No. You're missing the point. A case doesn't become good just because people agree with it, since those people could be wolves or just plain uninformed. By the same logic you are using Hazbot's vote on you is correct because me and Aedan agree that you should be lynched.
 
No. You're missing the point. A case doesn't become good just because people agree with it, since those people could be wolves or just plain uninformed. By the same logic you are using Hazbot's vote on you is correct because me and Aedan agree that you should be lynched.

Hazbot didn't make a case though, he just bandwagoned with some BS reason. But the fact that three people are voting for me does mean that I can't just go around and start saying that aedan (who started the case on me) is "presenting an abundance of poor cases" just because he's voting for a villager.
 
Again, deadline is 23:00 GMT TODAY.
 
Hazbot didn't make a case though, he just bandwagoned with some BS reason. But the fact that three people are voting for me does mean that I can't just go around and start saying that aedan (who started the case on me) is "presenting an abundance of poor cases" just because he's voting for a villager.
No. Actually it does. Assuming you are telling the truth about being a villager, then for all you know Hazbot, Aedan, and myself are the pack.