8 approvals. what is going on...
Rovsea needed to hand the card
He couldn't, rules say the player must pick someone adjacent on the player list.
A perfect storm of bad luck ruined our game, and I honestly don't think much could've been done to salvage it.
As expected. All 3 members of team 1 being resistance was a major blow to the spies, even more so since I was on it and my tendency for early sabotage made it unlikely someone on the team was hoping to build trust first. With the three of us cleared, there wasn't even a need to find the spies really, when we could make a team impossible to double sabotage. Rovsea removing himself from the equation with the exchange with Jerman was helpful, but the other two spies should have tried harder to get on team 1. Team 1 is the most important team in the game, and if it goes unsabotaged then the double sabotage mission is sure to happen.
Yes, but near the end it was stupidly obvious who the 3 spies were.So wait, I named all 3 spies correctly?
No bad.
I concur. I was tempted to propose adan's team as a bluff to get you and others suspicious of me to reject, but if I succeeded the game was over. Basically, I accidentally set us up for failure on day 1 by misreading the card, and giving it to somebody adjacent to me. Had I recognized what the rules were trying to tell me, I feel the game would have been much different. By the end, it was really just a mockery of a game that needed to be shot and hung up on the wall.So wait, I named all 3 spies correctly?
No bad.
I concur. I was tempted to propose adan's team as a bluff to get you and others suspicious of me to reject, but if I succeeded the game was over. Basically, I accidentally set us up for failure on day 1 by misreading the card, and giving it to somebody adjacent to me. Had I recognized what the rules were trying to tell me, I feel the game would have been much different. By the end, it was really just a mockery of a game that needed to be shot and hung up on the wall.