-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
This game should, by the way, not count for the record, or for the wins. I would say this if I had won, too.
Such an abortion of a lite game does not deserve to be counted among the wins of players like Madchemist and Marty. It should be presented as a case study for noobs trying to change the way things are.
This should never be forgotten.
Such an abortion of a lite game does not deserve to be counted among the wins of players like Madchemist and Marty. It should be presented as a case study for noobs trying to change the way things are.
This should never be forgotten.
While I agree this should be a case study of what not to do as a GM, for the same reasons we counted Panzer's last big we need to count this as an actual game.
The thing is there's a precedent of counting every game as long as it was concluded.
Besides two of the wolves were got without the help of the caliph, and the village would've won anyway. That strange trait only speeded up the game.
And I believe it's high time we set a new precedent. Jerman's foolhardiness certainly warrants it.
I wouldn't concur. I was smashing the wolves this game.
One thing though for future GMs, and I can't believe I missed that this was in the rules, is to never have hidden roles. Don't even do it in Big, but never in Lite.
This is a case study into roles that don't work, as I don't think I'm a bad GM, I just think my Role was OP.
Again, yeah, don't add hidden traits that noone knows about.
Again, yeah, don't add hidden traits that noone knows about.
We should have learned that after Randy's big.
Also has the irony of Jerman hosting a lite with a hidden role after the he was the rube in Wagon's two seer gambit been pointed out yet?