• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
That said, my theory was far from infallible, and in k-59's case it was, according to Wagonlitz, completely coincidental.
Indeed. As you might remember the day where tonka didn't vote and was subbed out k-59 didn't vote either. Now he had been active and voted previously on the day; and then unvoted without revoting. There wasn't really much doubt in my mind that it didn't deserve a sub, since it seemed like a clear mistake about when deadline was (as it also turned out). Anyway k-59 forgot when deadline was and hence never revoted---and that was the day when Audren was lynched. Meaning that he neither was on Audren or any other person.
Now k-59 may correct me, but judging from his reaction in the PM I don't see him not either saving Audren or being the decisive vote on Audren.
 
Thank you for hosting, Wagonlitz.

Well done to you, and I do mean that sincerely.

@EUROO7

I don't really appreciate being called an idiot for a single misstep, the value of which was arguable at the time. You may disagree with my actions and you may even think they are stupid, but condemning my entire person based on that isn't reasonable. And at that point in-game, when I was a known goodie, there was no game-related reason to attempt to provoke me.

This unwillingness to listen to me played a part in the loss. I certainly could have played more perfectly, but if you had considered my candidates as viable, your chance of winning would have been improved.

That said, my theory was far from infallible, and in k-59's case it was, according to Wagonlitz, completely coincidental.

Well done to the wolves and good game.
lol

It's a game, Aziz. I wasn't speaking to you, my role was speaking to yours. You'd do well to learn that.
 
Wagonlitz-
The theory was less about "oh look you didn't vote Audren you're suspicious" but rather "oh look you other people voted for Audren, now you're less suspicious and we should look at other people [who didn't vote for Audren] in preference to you". The end result was that those who didn't vote for Audren were placed under suspicion, since suspicion levels are relative, but reasons that k-59 didn't vote Audren wouldn't have been relevant.
 
lol

It's a game, Aziz. I wasn't speaking to you, my role was speaking to yours. You'd do well to learn that.
So much this. I rarely represent my exact thoughts on people when I post something in game, especially as by necessity my consideration of players must change on a game-by-game basis.