After-Action Report:
First, before I get into any criticism of your strategies, I want to start by saying you all are good at this game.
I also want to say that although Gen. Marshall lost (ie: did not finish in first place), I think this map gave too much of an advantage to the Green player. Obviously, that advantage was not insurmountable, so maybe it wasn't as big of a problem as I initially thought.
barkardes
What do you say to the man who bought twelve paratroopers?
I realize I say this every time barkardes tries something crazy and it works, but there was a lot of luck involved in barkardes' win, plus a pretty good amount of skill. barkardes relies on conservative defense until he can spring some kind of elaborate strategy on the other players. While it seems silly to call these "set piece attacks" since we're playing a map game, they really are set piece attacks - carefully planned maneuvers that depends on a lot of factors to succeed.
barkardes clearly wanted to go last and planned everything meticulously so that he would - he intended to spring his mass paratrooper offensive for the last possible moment, and pull off a sudden and miraculous reversal. It worked.
I will say that if aedan hadn't been vulnerable to defeat in that final moment, the assault would have failed.
Despite Gen. Marshall's statement that barkardes' mass paratrooper offensive surprised him, I assert that barkardes failed to achieve surprise and all three other players knew what he was about to do in advance.
Gen. Marshall
Let's talk about surprise. I'm surprised that Gen. Marshall said he was surprised by barkardes' surprise paratrooper offensive, because I (above) asserted that barkardes failed to achieve surprise. I'm surprised Gen. Marshall was surprised by barkardes' surprise paratrooper attack because he had a lot of different ways to see it coming.
(Has the word surprise lost all meaning yet? It has? Good. Let's move on.)
Gen. Marshall commanded a huge lead in this game until the fifth turn and executed all his offensives cleanly up until this point. He massively erred in assaulting aedan777 on the final turn, as failing to eliminate aedan empowered barkardes to kill aedan and seize victory. I don't think I can really criticize Gen. Marshall for assaulting aedan, since I'm also a member of the cult of the offensive and he had that blitzkrieg token to use. Nevertheless, the assault basically lost him the game.
He also should have known barkardes was plotting a mass paratrooper offensive, particularly after barkardes' forces advancing towards him were revealed to be a line of militia. (It was obvious barkardes had a lot of cash not on the board.) If Gen. Marshall had used his fifth turn to prepare for barkardes' paratrooper attack instead of attacking aedan777, we'd be talking about his victory was inevitable right now.
Rovsea
Rovsea was obviously distracted during this game. His offensives were sloppily executed. The weakness in barkardes' paratrooper strategy was it left him with only a token force to defend himself. Rovsea could have easily broken the back of barkardes' defenses and eliminated him, but a series of tactical blunders resulted in barkardes turning the tables on him in the first turn. Rovsea did not regain the initiative until the fourth or fifth turn, by which time it was too late.
Rovsea's assault against aedan, when he thought he could defeat aedan but couldn't, directly empowered barkardes to win the game. It's also worth noting that I thought about skipping Rovsea a few times for delay of the game. If I had, the outcome of the game probably would have been altered.
I also thought about making some Waiting For Godot jokes. I didn't.
aedan777
aedan finishes in last place this game, stabbed once in the front and twice in the back. As aedan mentioned, before the game barkardes and Rovsea fed him a line about how they all should unite against Gen. Marshall. aedan777, being a good citizen, attacked Gen. Marshall. The other two didn't, and the result was that aedan lost a good chunk of his forces for no gain. He was then attacked by all three players in the last turn, resulting in his defeat despite a competently structured defense. His execution was clean throughout the game. I don't think he made any tactical errors, but he was beaten on the strategic level.
Attacking aedan represented a mistake on Gen. Marshall's part, and to a lesser extent on Rovsea's part. Weakening aedan without actually defeating him empowered barkardes.
When I watched about aedan777's situation develop, I kept thinking of an interview of a battle-hardened Kurdish peshmerga commander in Iraq. "As crazy as it sounds, I trust ISIS," he said. "They're very honest about wanting to kill us. The rest just lie about it."
I also thought of a quote from a famous TV show, in which one of the characters said something like: "Of course I'm behind you." A second remarked: "You have to get behind a man to stab him in the back."