Hmm. So we had 3-way until the last minute yesterday which was broken by Hax saving himself and killing De Chatillôn the villager.
Quite a few throwaway votes (mine included). Though the votes did coalesce somewhat easily on De Chat, Hax & jeray. And shamefully one no-vote. Hax was put fairly easily into lead (though it wasn't bandwagon by any means) and then De Chatillôn up with him. Late in the cycle Jeray gets some votes and is in threeway tie.
Can somebody translate this to me? Seems nobody has batted an eyelid on it but it looked odd (at least with tired eyes) how jeray was talking about hunting:
Then again Claude did vote for jeray so maybe he did bat an eye on it.
Now who to vote? I'm going to ignore the front runners from yesterday as candidates for today for obvious reasons. But since yesterday was mostly focused around them maybe there was something on it.
vote DragonofAtlantis
as he's not been run up yet. But more importantly he was instrumental in running De Chatillôn the villager up and in having him lynched (3 Hax 2 De Chat and lots at 1 vote when he voted) by cementing him into the race firmly.
Hmm. So we had 3-way until the last minute yesterday which was broken by Hax saving himself and killing De Chatillôn the villager.
Quite a few throwaway votes (mine included). Though the votes did coalesce somewhat easily on De Chat, Hax & jeray. And shamefully one no-vote. Hax was put fairly easily into lead (though it wasn't bandwagon by any means) and then De Chatillôn up with him. Late in the cycle Jeray gets some votes and is in threeway tie.
Can somebody translate this to me? Seems nobody has batted an eyelid on it but it looked odd (at least with tired eyes) how jeray was talking about hunting:
Then again Claude did vote for jeray so maybe he did bat an eye on it.
Now who to vote? I'm going to ignore the front runners from yesterday as candidates for today for obvious reasons. But since yesterday was mostly focused around them maybe there was something on it.
vote DragonofAtlantis
as he's not been run up yet. But more importantly he was instrumental in running De Chatillôn the villager up and in having him lynched (3 Hax 2 De Chat and lots at 1 vote when he voted) by cementing him into the race firmly.
"Many throwaways... but there ended up being three candidates solid in the lead"
"Hax was voted into the lead easily... but it wasn't a bandwagon"
"Jeray made a suspicious post that no one noticed... but maybe someone noticed and I'm not going to vote for him"
"The frontrunners aren't good candidates... but maybe they're suspicious"
There's good reason to be indecisive this early on, but given the sheer amount of flipflopping in this post and the fact that this post has the result of casting suspicion on yesterday's frontrunners while giving you an excuse not to vote for them, I say
Vote Gen. S
I was referring to how De Chat gave me baddie points for voting Torn because Torn was dead and De Chat thought I was a wolf trying to get goodie points. I was saying that was a bad case because I was being incompetent, not a baddie, and when in previous games where I was a wolf and voted for someone I hunted that was also incompetence.
But I guess you just wanted to vote me because I voted you yesterday and you wanted to use "flipflopping" like I did when voting you?
Eh? I'm not indecisive per se, I'm typing a bit of my thought process out there. It's done, you know, to increase chances of actually getting some discussion going on.
But I guess you just wanted to vote me because I voted you yesterday and you wanted to use "flipflopping" like I did when voting you?
To me at least, you don't sound like you usually do here.
To me at least, you don't sound like you usually do here.
I support noting down thought processes, but your thought process ticks suspiciously many boxes that a wolf would also want to tick. This makes you, in my eyes, a more likely wolf. I will thus vote you for as long as you remain the most likely wolf in my eyes, with perhaps the exception of you not having many votes as we near deadline. That's my thought process.
Holy overreaction Batman. You're accusing me of pettiness when you only have a single vote to your name yet?
Perhaps. Or perhaps it's been a while since I played Lite so my day 2 ramblings aren't that clearly in peoples minds. The point is Marshall was using exactly same word as I had when voting him (and flipflopping is not that common word, I would think) and I wanted to point it out. I guess it could be part of his recent efforts in the general thread/bar to be funny when using same reasoning/wording other posters have used. I believe he's done it with at least Tornadoli and Wagonlitz.
Using the same uncommon word as I did when voting you yesterday? Yes, it did look very much like it.
I know Jeray's responded on this, but I'm not sure I buy his defense.I'll have you know that every time I've voted for the player I just hunted as a wolf it was out of incompetence, not out of seeking goodie points.
Was it really incompetence that he voted Torn? His vote came a mere three posts after the update.I was referring to how De Chat gave me baddie points for voting Torn because Torn was dead and De Chat thought I was a wolf trying to get goodie points. I was saying that was a bad case because I was being incompetent, not a baddie, and when in previous games where I was a wolf and voted for someone I hunted that was also incompetence.
And then we have this post before he made the first quote I have here. This seems very inconsistent on the part of Jeray, and while some people have mentioned parts of this today, he's yet to get a vote today. So I'll change that.Yeah but Audren was being all sassy and saying Torn was super dead.