• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
"Many throwaways... but there ended up being three candidates solid in the lead"
"Hax was voted into the lead easily... but it wasn't a bandwagon"
"Jeray made a suspicious post that no one noticed... but maybe someone noticed and I'm not going to vote for him"
"The frontrunners aren't good candidates... but maybe they're suspicious"

There's good reason to be indecisive this early on, but given the sheer amount of flipflopping in this post and the fact that this post has the result of casting suspicion on yesterday's frontrunners while giving you an excuse not to vote for them, I say

Vote Gen. S
This is the first vote on Skobie, so I'm more inclined to believe that Marshall is a goodie, unless this setup throws a screw ball at us. I believe he's a goodie because he continually defended his position and never changed his vote.

Vote k-59
Tornadoli with an absolutely useless and reasonless vote.

Hmm... I know that we still have time until deadline, but this is pretty ridiculous.
Right, lets try and analyze what happened yesterday. There seemed to be a TIE between jeray, Hax, and De Chat until it was broken by Hax in the name of self-preservation. It ended up nabbing a villager. Now I believe that we should take a look at both of those in the TIE, but given that there was only one who reacted towards saving himself, and the other threw his vote into the wind, I think we should take a look at Hax. That being said, it was D1 and Hax wasn't exactly put into the TIE for the most sparkling of reasons.
The jeray mess up is interesting, at least a bit. However that can probably be chalked up to forgetfulness. I'm sort of tempted to vote Torn so that he'd answer to my question and given that he gave a basically random vote, I might as well try.
I'm going to take a shower. Lets try and not just shamble like zombies to the deadline.

VOTE TORN
While I like this line of reasoning, Health did just talk up one candidate and then voted another, which is usually baddie tell, so some baddie points to Health.
UNVOTE DRAGON
VOTE GEN SKOBELEV

Sorry skobie. Dragon can tie me if he shows up and votes me in retaliation.
This doesn't feel like trying to sell out packmates to me, I think AOK was just going for survival purposes and had another option to vote, unless we managed to catch 3 wolves in the run up, which I find highly unlikely.
Oh shoot, I thought AOK had said that. I got confused between your avatars.

Unvote AOK
Vote Claude



I suggest a voteswitch of this sort will be beneficial to the game.
This does catch my eye however, since it seems like Torn is leading a charge away from Skobie, possibly a veiled attempt to save his packmate.

This vote catches my eye, because there isn't any reason given for it and it's possible that Claude thought that it was tied and he could push Dragon in front of Skobie, though it's just a hunch.

So in general, my preferred candidates would be Torn or Health, and Claude a decent backup. Since Torn already has several votes I think I'll see if Health can gain traction.

Vote Health
 
I stopped receiving notifications for this game. Why did we switch to the new forum again?

Looking through the votecount, Jackson and Tornadoli catch my eye. They are the only players to put another candidate in serious contention, following Spockyt's second vote on Skobelev. This seems to generally match what their strategies as wolves usually are.

Behaviourally, I'm much more suspicious of Jackson than I am of Tornadoli. Torn is putting himself out there and mounting a public attempt to switch to a candidate with no other votes, whereas Jackson seems to have been more succinct. Here's his vote post when Skobes already had two votes; it's an easy vote with no mention of Skobelev.

I think I'll pursue the case on DoA, as he's only made one game related post this entire time and he is a silent zombie when a baddie, and better case in my eyes than anything else thrown out there (at least Aedan and Health had the courtesy to try and analyze).

Vote DragonofAtlantis

Vote Jacksonian Missionaire
 
Less than four hours left and hardly anyone has voted.

VOTE MASS SUICIDE

Relax, it was worse yesterday, if memory serves.

While I like this line of reasoning, Health did just talk up one candidate and then voted another, which is usually baddie tell, so some baddie points to Health.

Whilst I agree with your reasoning, I'd like to point out what I told Hax yesterday. Whilst there would be information gained from voting him and I outlined why I felt that he should be looked at. At that point however I was more suspicious of Tornadoli at that point. Mainly due to his lack of reasoning for his for his vote, and due to his somewhat belligerent attitude, but that seems par the course. At this point I still feel that the Torn case makes some deal of sense. I do feel that AOK wouldn't have jumped ship at the final moment to lynch Skobles, if they had been packmates. The jumpers always seem to have an aura of uncertainty towards them, at least that is how it feels to me. Now the Late Comer arrived late as usual, but that doesn't mean that we should absolve him from suspicion. He pushed DOA into the TIE instead of voting for Gen. S. At this point I think he is somebody that we should also consider.

VOTE CLAUDIUS
 
Can someone explain me to me why a voteswitch to Claude would have been suspicious in the first place. How do you know he is not a wolf as well?

Plus, no one else going to consider AOK?
 
I think the push against Tornadoli today seems pretty sensible. He was pushing candidates who weren't Skobelev rather fiercely, and today he's tried to dismiss the case on him because he says we shouldn't look at who tried to "save" wolves, then he goes and votes AOK for trying to "save" Skobelev. But behaviourally I think this inconsistency and his general running around is slightly more common to him as a villager. I prefer Health as a candidate for talking up one candidate yesterday, then voting another, and that his vote on Claude today seems weak compared to other potential cases he could go for.

Vote Health
 
I think the push against Tornadoli today seems pretty sensible. He was pushing candidates who weren't Skobelev rather fiercely, and today he's tried to dismiss the case on him because he says we shouldn't look at who tried to "save" wolves, then he goes and votes AOK for trying to "save" Skobelev. But behaviourally I think this inconsistency and his general running around is slightly more common to him as a villager. I prefer Health as a candidate for talking up one candidate yesterday, then voting another, and that his vote on Claude today seems weak compared to other potential cases he could go for.

Vote Health

What's your opinion on fellow Health voter, Jackson?
 
Plus, no one else going to consider AOK?
Not if "he voted a wolf therefore he's a wolf" is your argument.
. This seems to generally match what their strategies as wolves usually are.
It is? That's news to me.

Behaviourally, I'm much more suspicious of Jackson than I am of Tornadoli. Torn is putting himself out there and mounting a public attempt to switch to a candidate with no other votes, whereas Jackson seems to have been more succinct. Here's his vote post when Skobes already had two votes; it's an easy vote with no mention of Skobelev.
Fair enough, but to be honest I didn't find Skobies actions all that suspicious, (where I was wrong admittedly) and I was pressed for time. Regardless I thought Dragon was a fine candidate who just happened to be tied with an actual wolf, something I couldn't have known.
 
Fair enough, but to be honest I didn't find Skobies actions all that suspicious, (where I was wrong admittedly) and I was pressed for time. Regardless I thought Dragon was a fine candidate who just happened to be tied with an actual wolf, something I couldn't have known.

Sure, that's plausible. There is of course nothing that explicitly disproves you from being a villager.

However; I'm looking for wolves who provided a counter-argument to the Skobelev case. Torn did so with gusto, you did so succinctly. I don't see anyone else who really sabotaged the case against Skobelev, so I'm obviously missing one or two wolves here, but I believe that there's bound to be at least one wolf who tried to save his packmate yesterday. Out of yourself and Torn, I consider you the more likely wolf. Besides, my gut says that your posts are wolfish, even if that isn't the kind of argument I'm going to convince anyone with.
 
VOTECOUNT (2ish HOURS REMAINING)

Tornadoli: 2
Hax [212]
EURO [215]

Health: 2
Jacksonian Missionary [221]
aedan [227]

AOK: 1
Tornadoli [217]

Hax: 1
Jeray [209]

Jacksonian Missionary: 1
Gen. Marshall [222]

Claude: 1
Health [223]

Not Voted: 3
@Claude LC
@AOK. 11
@k-59
 
This vote catches my eye, because there isn't any reason given for it and it's possible that Claude thought that it was tied and he could push Dragon in front of Skobie, though it's just a hunch.

Actually I did knew that it was in fact not tied, even though that Hax said it was, because moments before voting I checked and saw that he unvoted the wrong person, even though he claimed it was a tie.
So I decided to go for a tie.
 
Not if "he voted a wolf therefore he's a wolf" is your argument.

Recently, that has been happening far more than packmates blatantly saving packmates.

Sure, that's plausible. There is of course nothing that explicitly disproves you from being a villager.

However; I'm looking for wolves who provided a counter-argument to the Skobelev case. Torn did so with gusto, you did so succinctly. I don't see anyone else who really sabotaged the case against Skobelev, so I'm obviously missing one or two wolves here, but I believe that there's bound to be at least one wolf who tried to save his packmate yesterday. Out of yourself and Torn, I consider you the more likely wolf. Besides, my gut says that your posts are wolfish, even if that isn't the kind of argument I'm going to convince anyone with.

And, if you think someone saved Skobie, then this is far more likely than just blatantly going out and saving them. Seriously, how often has it happened that a wolf obviously and blatantly saved a packmate?
 
Fair enough, but to be honest I didn't find Skobies actions all that suspicious, (where I was wrong admittedly) and I was pressed for time. Regardless I thought Dragon was a fine candidate who just happened to be tied with an actual wolf, something I couldn't have known.
You can redeem yourself today by voting Tornadoli the furred one.
 
Actually I did knew that it was in fact not tied, even though that Hax said it was, because moments before voting I checked and saw that he unvoted the wrong person, even though he claimed it was a tie.
So I decided to go for a tie.
Consider voting to kill Tornadoli today, friend.
 
Recently, that has been happening far more than packmates blatantly saving packmates.



And, if you think someone saved Skobie, then this is far more likely than just blatantly going out and saving them. Seriously, how often has it happened that a wolf obviously and blatantly saved a packmate?

I'm slightly unnerved by how much you're parading this knowledge around. It smells like a double-bluff.
 
Are my succinct, concise, and precisely correct arguments threatening you?
Yes Torn. I can't stand it. I must have you killed.
 
I'm slightly unnerved by how much you're parading this knowledge around. It smells like a double-bluff.
You know in your bones Tornadoli must be elevated. His neck must crack.