• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

EU4 - Development Diary - 21st of February 2017

Hello everyone. Tuesday has crept up on us once again which means it's time to armour up, grab my sword and jump back into the Thunderdome that is the Developer multiplayer, but before that, we've got a new Dev Diary!

Today we'll take a closer look at the much speculated Tributary States mechanic from the upcoming expansion. It's been fun reading the comments of this thread and see what the community has been suspecting we've put in the game. I'll be tackling that here

Getting straight to the meat of it, Tributary is a new subject type in Europa Universalis IV available for Nations in the Eastern Religion Group. Tributaries can be established both through warfare and through diplomacy and, while large nations are certainly not going to want to become your tributary willingly, through winning war you can force a nation of any size to bend the knee and pay up.

When you have established a nation as your Tributary, you will receive and annual tribute from them. You as their overlord are able to instruct them what to send, from Money, Administrative Power, Diplo Power, Military Power and Manpower. each year of successful tribute mutually raises trust between the nations. If you are the benevolent type of player, you can even tell them that no tribute is necessary. I am not a benevolent Overlord.


eu4_110.png


Here is Ming with their mighty collection of Tributaries. Along with demanding annual tribute, there are some new interactions available exclusively for nations with tributaries (artwork for them not yet in, so don't mind the placeholders):


  • Bestow Gifts: send subject 0.5 of target’s yearly income,
  • Send additional troops: sent 2 years of subject’s manpower,
  • Demand artifacts: Take 5 prestige from subject,
  • Demand additional tribute: take 0.25 years of target’s income from target
these interactions will also affect the subjects' liberty desire, which brings us to an important point, what does it mean to be a tributary. For what purpose does a nation bend their knee to the tax collector?

Although Tributaries are subjects, they are the most free of any type of subject. They may make their own allies, subjects and foreign policy. They will not follow their overlord into wars or any of the usual subject behavior. Instead, they will be given protection. If another nation who is not also a tributary to the same overlord attacks them, their Overlord will be called to arms. The Overlord may accept or decline although, depending on the relationship and trust between the Overlord and Tributary. Declining will have ill effects on their relationship with their tributaries.

The main cause of relations going south is due to the subject refusing to give tribute. If liberty desire grows too high, caused by the usual modifiers from relative strength, relations etc, Tributaries may start thinking they would be better off keeping their hard-earned manpower, money or Power, and so refuse to give tribute. Eventually, this can lead to the Tributary relationship breaking down, so keep and eye on your subjects and don't demand too much additional Tribute.

Speaking of milking nations dry, it seemed only natural to give Hordes the ability to have tributaries. I've been having an absolute ball with my favourite nation keeping the Horde economy turning through my horseback tributary collectors.

eu4_111.png



Tributary States are a paid feature in the upcoming yet-unnamed expansion, and are available for Hordes and for nations in the Eastern Religion Group (Shinto, Confucian, Three Buddhists) and are additionally available for any nation who is the Emperor of China.

What is the Emperor of China, you ask?

We'll find that out next week.
 
Last edited:
Good. I've a question.

Is the subject type now can be modded?Since there are two new types this expansion,I am so curious about this.Like this
Code:
subject_type = {
name = *
trigger = {...}
overlord_modifier = {...}
subject_modifier = {...}
interactions = {..}
counted_in_dip_relations = boot
...
}

I would really like to know about this too, if you have an anwser :)
 
This ingame mechanic would not fit that historical situation. The 10% income you can demand through war is more suitable for this. There's also a difference between being tributary and paying off an aggressor from time to time.

IMHO Muscovy however should start as a tributary of Great Horde. In theory shouldn't Ashikaga Shogunate also start as a tributary of Ming? I recall having read they were nominally.

Japan (as most actually) had an on-off relationship with China, the last I recall is that the Ming contacted Ashikaga Yoshimitsu and granted him the title of King of Japan thus including him into the tributary system (to give him an incentive to get rid of the pirates terrorizing the seas incidentally) in the later 14th century, but after his reign the relationship was disregarded by his successor, then reestablished by the 6th Ashikaga ruler Yoshinori (reigned 1428-1441). After that it gets complicated, Ming seemed to have acted as if the shôgun was a tributary, but it seems the next time this relationship can be surmised from Japanese sources was in 1451...and then again not until the 1490s. (its later than my field of expertise so this right now is google power)
The thing is that actual tributary relations were NOT necessarily a continuous relationship in history, and usually were initiated by the countries that were not whoever ruled China, but by the "subjects". As a matter of fact tributary relations were profitable for the tributary and more often than not functioned as a sort of state-sanctioned trade veiled under the guise of diplomacy. The reason arguably being that the Chinese court gifted more precious things in return because *they were essentially obliged to do so to demonstrate their superiority as a civilization*.
 
My interminable attempts at playing Ryukyu shall now be just a little bit safer with my benevolent overlord China protecting me.
 
@DDRJake Please give tribal nations the option to receive tributaries too. That's how most of Africa's (excluding North Africa) and America's overlord-vassal relationships operated, instead of the current vassal system, which is more suited to European, Middle Eastern and West Asian history.
 
I cannot wait.
Was hoping the next dev announcement would be the release!
Unlikely. Still need to cover the Confucian and Shinto mechanics, so we have at least two more dev diaries, but I'm sure they will also have a subject/minor fixes DD. Guessing another month at least before release
 
@DDRJake
archduchy of austria between (1533-1606), republic of venice (as long as they have ioanian islands), russian tsardom between (1571-1701) were tributary states of the ottoman empire. also safavids, poland and morocco paid tributes to the ottoman empire time to time.
In my Ottoman games they all always pay their regularly tributes in form of provinces, war reparations and direct money. Isn't that enough? :D (joke)
 
This ingame mechanic would not fit that historical situation. The 10% income you can demand through war is more suitable for this. There's also a difference between being tributary and paying off an aggressor from time to time.
raises an interesting option from my point of view, if you can threaten war for a province, wouldn't it make sens to threaten war for tribute? like 5% of monthly income (smaller than war reparations).
 
Ooh, so will Grenada be a tributary for Castile?

edit -never mind, I just caught the eastern religion group requirement...
 
Last edited:
I see nowhere mention of the Ming or Qing empires paying their tributaries at al.. Only 'bestowing'...

This does not seem historically accurate. The Chinese demands that europeans only pay in silver was not because they loved the metal- it was becuase they were so cash strapped from paying all their tributaries massive amounts of silver.

The tribute system worked like this historically- whatever you gave to China- you received back ten fold. So while it makes sense that a tributary might send admin points or prestige or even legitmacy.

It makes NO sense for them to send money. The Tributary system should require the Ming to actually send their new subjects money. As was historically the case and eventually caused the ming to go basically bankrupt.
 
Ethiopia and horn of africa countries should also get the possibility for tributary states, somehow,
 
It makes NO sense for them to send money. The Tributary system should require the Ming to actually send their new subjects money. As was historically the case and eventually caused the ming to go basically bankrupt.
That and having a massive amount of princes living off government stipends.