Shut up and take my money
Seriously. When can I preorder?
Would you happen to be interested in a bridge or some land in Florida?
Shut up and take my money
Seriously. When can I preorder?
I find railroad is a bit of a subjective term. Sometimes things just happen to a country other times you will have options.As long as it gives options and doesn't railroad you with poor events.
swiss navy confirmedNo landlocked nation as had a tech tree added yet. How would Hungary deal without a navy tech tree? Would it have one there just in case it takes coastal provinces?
Hungary will have a navy, it is ruled by an Admiral.No landlocked nation as had a tech tree added yet. How would Hungary deal without a navy tech tree? Would it have one there just in case it takes coastal provinces?
Admiral of the Swiss Navy confirmed yet?swiss navy confirmed
his behavior has already been dealt with.snip
Modders have access to the events & they can copy & change the code as needed. Not sure what more you are asking for?Is it possible the King personal events could be put into a template that's easily copied over so modders can do the same for other leaders with various effects?
But that doesn't change the fact that many in this thread are acting like because the focus of this dev diary is focus trees, that means they aren't working on ai
Where do I start... The community is not "perfectly content" to let the modders do their thing. For example, look at the number of people who say one should use No Man's Land "because vanilla sucks". They have the mod, and they still complain about the base game. Note that I agree that some lands should be impassable, my point really is that people would also complain if Paradox let the modders do some of their work.Yeah that doesn't make sense. The community is perfectly content to let modders pick up the slack on unique focus trees (especially for minors) as that is something they can do. The community really wants to see fixes to things modders can't fix or really change that need to be improved. And if one crazy person did make your complaint, so what, it is no way comparable or equal to the current disappointment and criticism of the current dev diary by the community. I can't even understand how you could reason this to be a relevant comment or counter point to what is being expressed here.
You also have to remember what they said about only showing off features already prepared. There's a good chance the air portion is either not ready, or they simply want to show it off laterI think you are misunderstanding the majority of the criticism about this Dev Diary. In Podcat's own words:
Objectively, do a search for Romania Focus Tree and tally up how many posts there are about it. Now do search for anything else, like Air Warfare, Naval Warfare, Trade, AI, etc... So how does it make sense to lead off with a DD about Romania (a minor nation) and their focus tree and not expect some disgruntled / disapproving community feedback? Given the sentiment and frustrations of the community, it should've been obvious that the first DD for 1.4. have a bit more substance on something that matters to the majority of the players.
- When we released Together for Victory, the feedback we got for the focus trees was somewhat mixed.
- a lot of people felt that that the new trees wasn't adding much to the way they played.
- We started digging into telemetry data on what countries people actually played after TFV, and things got a lot clearer: About 40% of players play Germany, with other major nations following behind at quite a distance.
- People don’t like filler diaries, so if we don't have anything exciting to talk about it just means people not getting to read stuff they want and taking up the team's development time actually making stuff. I prefer not to make them if that is the alternative.
I understand that the HOI4 team doesn't want to over-commit or overstate features still being worked on. Perhaps at this point in development the Romania focus tree and such was the more responsible choice for a dev diary. Whatever the case may be though, it is understandable for the community to have some criticism about this. Especially when you consider what Podcat had just said and compare it with what he just did, and the current sentiment/frustrations of the community. IMHO anyway.
In that case France should also be intended to die after 6 weeks of battles and Poland is intended to die one month after start of the war yet they both get their own unique focus trees. Omitting one of the most developed countries of that time is kinda unjustifiable. Especially when the history could be so drastically different if they would be able to avoid Munich. In the game when you can do (hell, even are encouraged) to do world conquest as Asia one province minor the argument "that country is intended to die, lets forget about it" is invalid.Czechoslovakia is intended to die and should be very low on their priority list for a focus tree.
Podcat said that Asia/Pacific will be the focus for the Expansion after this one.