.png){kind=avatar}
what about open farmland dotted with irrigation ditches? those are fun.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
what about open farmland dotted with irrigation ditches? those are fun.
Hmm... Will try, but as history has proven, I have bad luck with irrigation ditches.
Since I'm still uncertain about both for reds and whether another will compete for votes:
Vote beamed
Vote beamed
Uncle Nasse shows how to use his good senses, like drink sense and navel sense:
So pay attention you little shitpants and listen up.
Well I kind of assumed no pack would leave standing orders unsent at this point. But I suppose that's (slim) possibility, too.
Just few nitpicks about those on top of your goodie list but I generally find it pretty decent synopsis.
Claude did have quite the bandwagonish vote on already-doomed alynkio which could be alibi vote. However I'll concur that his vote on Arkasas was pretty vital in getting him killed so unlikely red.
Cliges got fairly important vote on Arkasas but it's also noteworthy to see it was vote that tied Arkasas with Audren. Kind of "natural" vote in that moment (which of course turned out to be important) so I wouldn't consider it quite as important vote as what Claude put. But anti-red vote nonetheless.
Johho was himself target of bandwagon for the second day in a row when he voted Arkasas so it was self-defence. Important vote in getting Arkasas lynched nonetheless and of course Johho ain't dark red in case that pack ain't wiped out.
Audren's vote wasn't the killing vote since Audren & Arkasas were tied while Audren had his vote elsewhere. He simply saved himself the only way he could. Now, Arkasas on the other hand seemed to have bit of a fetish in voting Audren so I wouldn't consider them packmates because of that but if you judge by Audren's voting alone you can't say he killed Arkasas.
Yeah, you do have a point with "almost too bad voting record to be baddie" but I doubt every wolf would swarm over packmates to put alibi votes in. On some individual cases it's not a bad thing to keep in mind (like Johho earlier said about the_hdk liking alibi votes) but generally speaking I'd rather see someone with bad voting record be lynched than someone with decent voting record.
anyways, a lot of players haven't seen action nor have offered much opinions of their own.
You better do. Also, whatwhatwhat? Uncle Nasse doesn't understand how there could be a place to not get drunk in?
Hmm. Any thoughts on any other players/candidates?
I don't get the "whether another will compete for votes". If you have a case against somebody, please make it.
Could you also give some opinion on some players? You are practically unknown to all since Black_Griffin was zombieing around so speaking up would be most appreciated.
Beamed: 3
Gen. Skobelev [633]
Sleepyhead [642]
Daleksbane [644]
Health: 3
Audren [609]
BlackCrown [612]
Canadian_95_RTS [645]
not voted: 9
Health []
deathbywombat []
Steed []
johho888 []
punkbob []
Beamed []
Cliges []
Claude LC []
Eternaly_Lost []
Gen. Skobelev [633]
Sleepyhead [642]
Daleksbane [644]
Health: 3
Audren [609]
BlackCrown [612]
Canadian_95_RTS [645]
not voted: 9
Health []
deathbywombat []
Steed []
johho888 []
punkbob []
Beamed []
Cliges []
Claude LC []
Eternaly_Lost []
A reminder on the Cursed trait as yet another no hunt appears. We shouldn't continue to trust early votes, as their owners may well have changed.
Uncle Nasse is equal parts terrifying and ridiculous.
He wouldn't be out of place on The League Of Gentlemen.
He wouldn't be out of place on The League Of Gentlemen.
Going to simply ignore all the earlier voting isn't the best way since original wolves have obviously been baddies from the start and their voting pattern could be detected. But yeah, keeping in mind the possibility of turning isn't bad idea. So let's say the weight of early votes has been lessened but obviously we have to work with something.
Welcome to having a glimpse at 80's Finland!
If Uncle Nasse loses I shall be highly disappointed. He must be kept alive at all costs!
I just prefer not to wake up in places where water has appeared over night.
Preservation vote for Health although the case doesn't 100% convince me at the moment.
Alright, as far as other reads go, I would say I have a general goodie vibe from Audren and DeathbyWombat, slight baddie coming from BlackCrown. I get almost nothing from Beamed though, I can't really explain it. Other than that, I don't have strong reads on anyone at the moment.
Right onto analysis. Yesterday we had an outing and so whilst there is not much to gain from it, we still have something to do. Besides finding the quite sky high run up that I had a bit odd, largely due to the full on reliance of trust in Audren, I've been finding E_L quite suspicious to be honest.
What do I mean by that, well let us turn to the vote counts.
On D0 E_L voted for none of the major candidates, though this appears to largely be a moot point due to the fact that none of the wolves seemingly voted in unison to get the trait for one of their own. Their spread has been quite wide and the only significant thing seems to be k-59 and alynkio voting together. There might be something more to Arky's so called sycophantic ways for voting Beamed, but currently I doubt it.
On D1 E_L once again avoided the major candidates, lacking any sort of rhyme or reason for such action and citing the need for time to pass before analyzing votes became useful.
On D2 E_L once again avoided major candidates and I'm starting to recognize a pattern here. Quite a throwaway vote that similarly to the day before that led to nothing.
On D3 E_L participated in the run-ups of johho and alynkio, one of which netted us a cultist. His reasons for going onto johho and then off of him to head onto alynkio were light at best and bandwagony at worst.
On D4 E_L jumped on the bandwagon that formed on Aud and never came off it. Lack of rhyme and reason for yet another vote.
On D5 E_L went avoided a major candidate until the outing, at which point he went along with it.
In combination with the general quietness, this twitchiness on bandwagoning or generally avoiding the main candidates E_L looks more and more like a Wolf to me. As such...
VOTE E_L
What do I mean by that, well let us turn to the vote counts.
On D0 E_L voted for none of the major candidates, though this appears to largely be a moot point due to the fact that none of the wolves seemingly voted in unison to get the trait for one of their own. Their spread has been quite wide and the only significant thing seems to be k-59 and alynkio voting together. There might be something more to Arky's so called sycophantic ways for voting Beamed, but currently I doubt it.
On D1 E_L once again avoided the major candidates, lacking any sort of rhyme or reason for such action and citing the need for time to pass before analyzing votes became useful.
On D2 E_L once again avoided major candidates and I'm starting to recognize a pattern here. Quite a throwaway vote that similarly to the day before that led to nothing.
On D3 E_L participated in the run-ups of johho and alynkio, one of which netted us a cultist. His reasons for going onto johho and then off of him to head onto alynkio were light at best and bandwagony at worst.
On D4 E_L jumped on the bandwagon that formed on Aud and never came off it. Lack of rhyme and reason for yet another vote.
On D5 E_L went avoided a major candidate until the outing, at which point he went along with it.
In combination with the general quietness, this twitchiness on bandwagoning or generally avoiding the main candidates E_L looks more and more like a Wolf to me. As such...
VOTE E_L
happy fathers day!
if i get a count at deadline, you can expect short update on time. otherwise will be late.
if i get a count at deadline, you can expect short update on time. otherwise will be late.
Health: 4
Audren [609]
BlackCrown [612]
Canadian_95_RTS [645]
Beamed [653]
Beamed: 3
Gen. Skobelev [633]
Sleepyhead [642]
Daleksbane [644]
Eternaly_Lost: 1
Health [656]
not voted: 7
deathbywombat []
Steed []
johho888 []
punkbob []
Cliges []
Claude LC []
Eternaly_Lost []
Audren [609]
BlackCrown [612]
Canadian_95_RTS [645]
Beamed [653]
Beamed: 3
Gen. Skobelev [633]
Sleepyhead [642]
Daleksbane [644]
Eternaly_Lost: 1
Health [656]
not voted: 7
deathbywombat []
Steed []
johho888 []
punkbob []
Cliges []
Claude LC []
Eternaly_Lost []
I have developed disdainful distrust dealing directly with Audren this game.
Will review. Not sure how much I like any of these candidates.
Will review. Not sure how much I like any of these candidates.
That being:
which I think referred to Beamed piling on Health.
In a way I can sympathize with that since we've had quite a few bandwagons (and counter-wagins) this game and Beamed has been in on a few but so have for instance Daleksbane and BlackCrown, not to mention yourself. OTOH I'd really like to see Health allignment because so many have had interactions with him.
I guess. I could have picked easier targets though. But if you want to be the devil's advocate, sure as a baddie about to get lynched I might have built a case against a packmate to give him a better chance later on.
I actually don't think @the_hdk was much into alibi votes back in the days, I just said that to try to convince all of you to vote him since I knew he was a wolf. That said, you should always consider if a vote on/by a baddie could have been an alibi vote.