-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Will go with a one time amnesty on no votes today because I don't want to have to randomly choose whom to autolynch and whom to sub. But starting tomorrow, that's what will happen; not out of anger on my part, but Lites can't function with frequent or repeated non-participants.
Also, sub volunteers are much appreciated.
Also, sub volunteers are much appreciated.
Right-o. There is no case on E_L, mind. I picked him because he'd been silent. I'm not opposed to lynching him, but this inactivity is unnerving.
Since we have several people well versed with French and France here, is it then worth it to watch Jean de Florette?
Day 2
The extent to which lycanthropy was linked to witches sabbaths was debated, but never a clearly settled issue. Neither was it determined if such gatherings were linked to the odd drowsiness that sometimes struck. But expulsions still happen; but just not the right people.
One theory held that shape-shifting among loups-garrous occurred only 3 times a week. If that were the case, then this would be the final night of the threat. But that seems unlikely.
E_L the villager was lynched
Ithvan the villager was hunted
"And an oddly convenient rectangular cliff serves well for contrast and the creation of ominous shadows!"
The extent to which lycanthropy was linked to witches sabbaths was debated, but never a clearly settled issue. Neither was it determined if such gatherings were linked to the odd drowsiness that sometimes struck. But expulsions still happen; but just not the right people.
One theory held that shape-shifting among loups-garrous occurred only 3 times a week. If that were the case, then this would be the final night of the threat. But that seems unlikely.
E_L the villager was lynched
Ithvan the villager was hunted
"And an oddly convenient rectangular cliff serves well for contrast and the creation of ominous shadows!"
.png){kind=avatar}
Pretty much purely for the sake of being somebody ignored the day before. I knew Ithvan had voted him and he seemed like a good bet.
I find Wagon's weirdness about the TIE somewhat odd. Like, sniping into a two-way isn't so bad, and sniping into a three-way would be lynchbait, so.... I'm not sure what he was worried about. I wasn't vibing on the case on him yesterday, but behavioural tics like that are rubbing me wrong.
VOTE WAGONLITZ
VOTE WAGONLITZ
Tell TIE day to shove it. It's not that big of a deal to be overly concerned about.
Turns out it's well worth watching. I can highly recommend it to people who like proper movies.
As something else then there always is something about French in movies which makes them sound really pleasing.
A wolf would say that his vote for Aedan was random, the way it would be not random is if he had inside information on who's a packmate and should be avoided voting. @Arkasas and @Audren if you have explanations for why you'd vote Aedan that would be nice though.
How is making a case early wolfish? I am at work during deadline, and cannot be on.
My vote will be on Audren today. He was tied with Eternaly Lost, then Wagon voted EL(perhaps saving a packmate), then Claude voted Audren making a TIE again, then alynkio voted EL(perhaps saving a packmate).
Vote Audren
I still feel Audren is a good candidate, he hasn't done anything to really impress me. Even if I do kind of agree lynching Aedan Day 1 every now and again keeps the game interesting. However I'm going to try and shift focus for now and hope people agree with my sentiment on him. Now for me to go over some people I also find suspicious.
Jeray: He's been a complete zombie throughout the game so far, and especially with his less than spectacular vote on Day 2.
Capage: Also a zombie who couldn't even be bothered to vote yesterday. I don't think I've ever played with him, but so far I'm unimpressed and he was also a candidate midway through Day 1 and then he simply faded away. I feel like this could be a pack attempting to save their mate during a big vote swing and he hasn't been pressured since. Not the best candidate today, but certainly not a bad one either. I would also lump Livingstone into this group and I haven't been all impressed with his voting either, but he's been actually voting and so I'd give Capage the edge in my voting choice. But still keep an eye on Livingstone.
So yeah I'd say running up Audren, Jeray, or Capage would be pretty good ideas. I'm going to go with Jeray right now and maybe we can tie him with Audren.
Vote Jeray
Jeray: He's been a complete zombie throughout the game so far, and especially with his less than spectacular vote on Day 2.
His other vote is just a random day 1 vote on Capage (Just noticed his vote on Audren, so small points to him I guess). His 6 total posts in the entire game and his shaky logic for voting makes him an excellent candidate in my opinion.
Capage: Also a zombie who couldn't even be bothered to vote yesterday. I don't think I've ever played with him, but so far I'm unimpressed and he was also a candidate midway through Day 1 and then he simply faded away. I feel like this could be a pack attempting to save their mate during a big vote swing and he hasn't been pressured since. Not the best candidate today, but certainly not a bad one either. I would also lump Livingstone into this group and I haven't been all impressed with his voting either, but he's been actually voting and so I'd give Capage the edge in my voting choice. But still keep an eye on Livingstone.
So yeah I'd say running up Audren, Jeray, or Capage would be pretty good ideas. I'm going to go with Jeray right now and maybe we can tie him with Audren.
Vote Jeray
Wait, I need a valid reason to execute my neighbors without evidence? This is tyranny
And as a repressed citizen, you should know how oppressing that is!!
(it was a joke vote, and although I would have kept to it anyway I didn't have any access to the internet around deadline because I was doing inventory work in the catacombs of the Capitol tunnels, and I didn't have a phone on me. So there was no ability to change that).
Someone actually laughs at my jokes? You just made my day
Man you made me laugh so much.
That ain't the way I roll: if my method accidentally turned up a pack member, and said packmember somehow found himself in trouble, I would just find a joke reason to change my vote later on. It's day one, standards are pretty low for how votes are cast.
On to more serious matters,
Why it is your tunneling on my randomness, which has been consistent and well documented in previous rounds, strikes me as odd. I at least have given a "reason" for voting Aedan (that you may not like), and yet you haven't given the other voters any trouble. And really, your entire arguments is based around completely generic accusations, almost as if you just pulled my name out of a hat of Aedan voters. Consider me suspicious.
I don't really know what to think of Wagonlitz at this time. I refuse to read into day 1 actions on principle, and there's nothing wrong with trying to prevent an "accidental" TIE. That being said, him quibbling over semantics and fine points, and then posting about random topics (French language and movies) rouses my suspicion because those are the clinical symptoms of Wagon-lycanthropy. Except for the fact that said random topic was not about Denmark. I'm leaning towards him for now.
Audren is guilty for not giving a reason for voting yesterday.... and thats about it. I agree with him interrogating Wagon for further details. I'm inclined not to go after him unless I missed something.
Last edited: