Yes. With 2 non votersShould be a TIE between Landy and Spock as far as I can see.
Yes. With 2 non votersShould be a TIE between Landy and Spock as far as I can see.
You're annoying. Thought somebody sniped.Yes. With 2 non voters
Why I'm annoying?You're annoying. Thought somebody sniped.
Why make me France?!<No pictures because imgur is being stupid>
A Landy had a single dream. To create the greatest British Kingdom of them all. But, in his haste, he angered three rivals, the kingdoms of France and Spain and the Greater German Empire, played by Spockyt, Uebeltank, and Comm Cody, respectively. Of course, as they tried their visions got distorted and their visions of clean borders were ruined.
A Landy the World Conquest Auteur (Inquisitor) was lynched.
Spockyt the Map Painter (Villager) was lynched.
Uebeltank the Map Painter (Villager) was autolynched for inactivity.
Comm Cody the Map Painter (Villager) was hunted.
Because as mentioned I thought somebody sniped.Why I'm annoying?
Ah, my inexperience finally got me killed :'(
Oh well
Spockyt's throwaway at the end of the day is a possible point to follow. I also find it notable that some of the early Arkasas votes cited his bandwagoning of Capage, but he was hardly the only one to do so, or the most egregious about it. Audren joined the bandwagon after Arkasas and had a vote soon after Arkasas did, but never received another. If I hadn't been the one who voted Audren yesterday, I'd probably vote him today, but I don't want tunnel over something small like this. Other than that can't say anything strikes me as a useful lead to follow from yesterday. Not sure why Wagon's leading well ahead in votes today.
Actually, there is one more thing I find suspicious from yesterday. A Landy's vote on Arkasas put him ahead at five votes when no one else had more than two. And today he's voted Wagonlitz into a further lead as well. Even before he voted Arkasas, his vote on Capage had been the fifth on him too, when no one else had more than a single vote. That's an awful lot of bandwagoning for just the first two days. Worth investigating at the very least.
Vote A Landy
I hardly made a case against Spockyt, I simply acknowledged the pre-existing case against him had some merit. I did make a case against A Landy, but so what? The case was solid, not a single player, including A Landy, said it was a poor one. It caught a goodie instead of a baddie, but I'm not infallible, especially if a goodie is acting suspiciously.Aedan here makes a case on two players we now know are goodies, one of whom's an inquisitor.
I didn't defend Wagonlitz, just said I didn't see why he had 3 votes when no one else had more than one. The reasons cited for voting him were fairly weak, and no one responded to my comment by giving any more reasons why Wagon should be a candidate. Had someone given a more thorough explanation of why they suspected Wagonlitz, I might have voted him. Even as things were, I had no opposition to lynching him per se, I simply didn't believe the evidence presented was sufficient for him to be the leading candidate by a two vote margin.He also defends Wagon, who's very possibly a wolf whose packmates pushed onto A Landy to save.
I don't know what you think this proves. It's fairly common for a candidate I build a case on getting several votes afterwards, regardless of my roll. Either from lemming villagers, or baddies looking to get an easy lynch on a candidate chosen by a villager. Ones who look worst from this are Comm Cody, Wagonlitz, and Claude.Wagonlitz was ahead 3:1 to A Landy, then after Aedan's case Landy went up to five votes until Wagon himself switched to Spocky, then Claude switched to Spocky, which made the 4:4 Landy:Spocky TIE.
I disagree. There are 10 players left alive, four of them being wolves. If we don't lynch a wolf today we lose, so votes can't be put out carelessly.I think this is enough to merit a vote.
Vote Aedan
Three minutes until deadline and Wagon correctly is pointing out there is a tie. Now, as Wagon often does, he's adamantly opposing a tie, since it's just day 2, not day 3, the assigned and holy Tie Day. Oh, wait no he's not. Wagon doesn't say a word against the tie, which is very out of character for him. What's his response to learning the tie stood and two people were lynched on not-tie day?Should be a TIE between Landy and Spock as far as I can see.
He's upset that Claude made him think someone sniped. There are ways to interpret this in wagon's favor, but I think it's telling that he doesn't say anything that indicates he's upset with the tie standing.You're annoying. Thought somebody sniped.
I... actually agree with pretty much everything here. I'm nearly positive that Wagon and Aedan are packmates, his statement about Wagon in his post just sticks out too much in my mind and it completely swayed the lynch away from the leading Wagonlitz. Wagon has also acted completely out of character this game and I will eat my hat if he isn't a wolf.Aedan here makes a case on two players we now know are goodies, one of whom's an inquisitor. He also defends Wagon, who's very possibly a wolf whose packmates pushed onto A Landy to save. Wagonlitz was ahead 3:1 to A Landy, then after Aedan's case Landy went up to five votes until Wagon himself switched to Spocky, then Claude switched to Spocky, which made the 4:4 Landy:Spocky TIE.
I think this is enough to merit a vote.
Vote Aedan
And this is a pretty weak defense, as this is pretty much Aedan brushing off any analysis done against him as nothing major, straight up lies about not defending Wagon. His statement about his disbelief that Wagon is in the lead is his way of protecting Wagon and swaying the vote away from him. And it's pretty clear that his voting of Wagon now is backtracking and trying to save face here because Wagon is almost too obvious not to vote right now.Lots of words
This is the one passage that really bothers me. This is so wishy washy of a stance where he's basically saying that he wasn't opposed to the Wagon lynch but he didn't want to vote him either is pretty blatant wolfish behavior. This is a whole lot of fluff and very little substance if you care to actually look into what he's saying.I didn't defend Wagonlitz, just said I didn't see why he had 3 votes when no one else had more than one. The reasons cited for voting him were fairly weak, and no one responded to my comment by giving any more reasons why Wagon should be a candidate. Had someone given a more thorough explanation of why they suspected Wagonlitz, I might have voted him. Even as things were, I had no opposition to lynching him per se, I simply didn't believe the evidence presented was sufficient for him to be the leading candidate by a two vote margin.