• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Official count, day 1, 3 hours and 54 minutes to deadline
Cody: 3
Jacksonian Missionary [118]
ramius3443 [115 spam -> 120]
Claude LC [135]

Jackson: 3
aedan777 [109]
deathbywombat [126]
alynkio [107 Claude -> 136]

Claude: 2
Spockyt [124]
Comm Cody [117 ram -> 139]

Spam: 2
Rovsea [106]
jeray2000 [114]

Spock: 1
F72Voyager [108]

Alynkio: 1
BlackCrown [110]

BC: 1
Audren [111]

aedan: 1
Arkasas [113]

Adam: 1
SPAMbuca [104 Adam -> 132 Claude -> 141]

Not voted: 1
Adamgerd []

Voyager tried voting Wagon in 105, but Wagon's GM​
 
no TIE today. curse the avatar change

UNVOTE BLACKCROWN
VOTE CLAUDE
 
counting is easy young man, manuveuring's harder
 
@jeray2000 @Rovsea Why vote SPAMbuca? He's a brand new player, and an active one at that. We tend to keep new active players alive. Voting SPAMbuca is the day 1 equivalent of saying "this is an obvious early throwaway vote which I'm either going to change or ignore."

And yes, I know it's 3+ hours to deadline. But why make a known throwaway?

Not an accusation of WW nefariousness or a role-read, mind you. (Yet.) Just curious.


Why is there so much hypocrisy.

In fairness, the best players are shockingly hypocritical when it comes to werewolf - at least WW wolfing, at any rate.
 
Jackson expressed a desire to die early. The wolves dishonorably have not obliged him. While Jackson has excellent wolfdar and is handy to keep around, perhaps we should honor his request.

I mean, there's always the possibility they can't hunt him, as he is one of them. But you seem to indicate here that you already know his alignment, however. Anything to share with us?
 
Yeah, I'm actually curious enough about alynkio's wording to want to vote him here (and I'll be reasonably sure of Jackson's alignment by day 2 anyway.) Still want an answer from Rovsea/Jeray2000 about the point I raised. The rest of the day 1 voting appears to be pretty pointless, though if anyone else has any ideas to put forward I'd love to hear them

Unvote Jacksonian Missionary
Vote Alynkio

Gonna take a nap, will be onish before but not at deadline.
 
Of course Jackson is a wolf; he's from Chemist Clan.
 
Official count, day 1, 3 hours and 10 minutes to deadline
Cody: 4
Jacksonian Missionary [118]
ramius3443 [115 spam -> 120]
Claude LC [135]
BlackCrown [110 Alynkio -> 147]

Claude: 3
Spockyt [124]
Comm Cody [117 ram -> 139]
Audren [111 BC -> 144]

Jackson: 2
aedan777 [109]
alynkio [107 Claude -> 136]

Spam: 2
Rovsea [106]
jeray2000 [114]

Spock: 1
F72Voyager [108]

aedan: 1
Arkasas [113]

Adam: 1
SPAMbuca [104 Adam -> 132 Claude -> 141]

Alynkio: 1
deathbywombat [126 Jackson -> 150]

Not voted: 1
@Adamgerd []

Voyager tried voting Wagon in 105, but Wagon's GM​
 
you fuckers really want to tie on day one?


Every game I play, the village proves to be a bigger pack of retards than I thought they could be.

UNVOTE RAM VOTE CLAUDE
Ah yes, insults: the best way to convince us not to lynch you :p


Are we really going to try to run up two players on day 1 though? Shouldn't Cody alone be enough?
 
Before the game started, JM was pretty adamant on only being used as zombie/night 0 fodder. Is him actually playing now an indication he isn't a villager? I don't know him well enough, but in general it might be a warning light. I however, also do not want to look ungrateful for him playing along as we might not have been able to start if he was out.

I'm considering to switching to him though as no one seems interested in voting Adam. If he doesn't vote however, he will be replaced and we probably couldn't get any insight on him and his successor.
 
Official count, day 1, 1 hour and 48 minutes to deadline
Cody: 4
Jacksonian Missionary [118]
ramius3443 [115 spam -> 120]
Claude LC [135]
BlackCrown [110 Alynkio -> 147]

Claude: 3
Spockyt [124]
Comm Cody [117 ram -> 139]
Audren [111 BC -> 144]

Jackson: 3
aedan777 [109]
alynkio [107 Claude -> 136]
SPAMbuca [104 Adam -> 132 Claude -> 141 Adam -> 155]

Spam: 2
Rovsea [106]
jeray2000 [114]

Spock: 1
F72Voyager [108]

aedan: 1
Arkasas [113]

Alynkio: 1
deathbywombat [126 Jackson -> 150]

Not voted: 1
@Adamgerd []

Voyager tried voting Wagon in 105, but Wagon's GM​
 
@jeray2000 @Rovsea Why vote SPAMbuca? He's a brand new player, and an active one at that. We tend to keep new active players alive. Voting SPAMbuca is the day 1 equivalent of saying "this is an obvious early throwaway vote which I'm either going to change or ignore."

And yes, I know it's 3+ hours to deadline. But why make a known throwaway?

Not an accusation of WW nefariousness or a role-read, mind you. (Yet.) Just curious.



In fairness, the best players are shockingly hypocritical when it comes to werewolf - at least WW wolfing, at any rate.

I just followed Rovsea's vote because we're a team in the Diplomacy game and there's nothing better early Day 1.

Jacksonian should probably die though since he has no time to play. I didn't realize he was in.

Unvote Spam
Vote Jacksonian
 
Due to a hint from previous posts, I believe Rovsea isn't a wolf, but probably a villager, but the vote would be useless and seems throwaway, and I don't want to tie on day 1
Vote Cody
 
Due to a hint from previous posts, I believe Rovsea isn't a wolf, but probably a villager, but the vote would be useless and seems throwaway, and I don't want to tie on day 1
Vote Cody

Could you elaborate on that statement? It's quite something to say someone isn't a wolf at this point by virtually nothing.

I agree we should not tie day 1 though. I'm also not sure I really like Jeray's post. I feel he takes no responsibility for a vote by pointing he is following someone else.
 
Due to a hint from previous posts, I believe Rovsea isn't a wolf, but probably a villager, but the vote would be useless and seems throwaway, and I don't want to tie on day 1
Vote Cody

Could you elaborate on that statement? It's quite something to say someone isn't a wolf at this point by virtually nothing.

I agree we should not tie day 1 though. I'm also not sure I really like Jeray's post. I feel he takes no responsibility for a vote by pointing he is following someone else.

Yeah. Would love some explanation here myself.