• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I also favor an approach with more screenshots and less text. There's only so much one can do with the writing when it's fairly dry reports of combat actions and maneuvers, while a screenshot tells a thousand words and really conveys the same information more effectively to boot!
 
I also favor an approach with more screenshots and less text. There's only so much one can do with the writing when it's fairly dry reports of combat actions and maneuvers, while a screenshot tells a thousand words and really conveys the same information more effectively to boot!
Hehe, one of the most interesting "divisions" on these fora are those who have a preference to text or screenshots. I suspect it might have something to do with whether the person concerned has come across too much dry writing or too many contextless screenshots.

The trick is balance. That balance will vary from AAR to AAR and writer to writer.
 
Hehe, one of the most interesting "divisions" on these fora are those who have a preference to text or screenshots. I suspect it might have something to do with whether the person concerned has come across too much dry writing or too many contextless screenshots.

The trick is balance. That balance will vary from AAR to AAR and writer to writer.

Certainly agreed. I've seen it done very well both ways, of course. Talking Turkey, for example, is a current text-heavy AAR that does it very well, while Rennslaer's current(?) HPP Germany AAR relies on information-dense visuals. That said, I do personally think that it's more situational than anything, and in the case of fairly generic reports on combats and maneuvers, a visual presentation can usually be more effective than an itemized reporting format - though again, both have been done very well in the past.
 
Certainly agreed. I've seen it done very well both ways, of course. Talking Turkey, for example, is a current text-heavy AAR that does it very well, while Rennslaer's current(?) HPP Germany AAR relies on information-dense visuals. That said, I do personally think that it's more situational than anything, and in the case of fairly generic reports on combats and maneuvers, a visual presentation can usually be more effective than an itemized reporting format - though again, both have been done very well in the past.
Thanks for the shout-out :D. I agree with both you and Stynlan. I’m happy to see lots of words, but personally feel they are easier to take if they’re adding or explaining something different to what’s in the screenshot, which can be great to convey a situation but sometimes needs a bit of explaining too. So, a personalised battle account, an explanation about the intent behind the moves or a series of them which the image is trying to summarise, as well as saying what happened, musings about future plans/fears etc. But each to personal preference.

While my own AAR entries are indeed text heavy at times (I worry a little about that sometimes, but it is what it is), I also average around 20-30 pictures (illustrative) or screenshots per entry. Funnily enough, my approach is to edit and ‘post produce’ all the screenshots first (often whittling down 60-100 initial shots per chapter) then write the text based on those (except for where it’s a non-gameplay narrative section - story, Cabinet meeting, etc).

And as you both say, each authAAR has their own approach, and sometimes it can vary from entry to entry for good reason. I do agree though, if you have a picture it can save words - to talk about other things ;). And I think Anthonest has said this time round he just didn’t have as many screenshots handy. But he asked for comment, and I might say I think all so far has been very fair, respectful and constructive - which is always nice to see :)
 
Last edited:
I think the way yo write the reports is fine, but it is your AAR
 
ZZx7SPa.png



Part X.
19 SEPTEMBER:
The past week of the campaign as been a resounding success, the speed of our advance is unprecedented in German military history, by now the world knows we have changed the face of warfare for all time to come. By the earliest hours of September 19, Panzer divisions stand at the gates of Warsaw, an entire Polish army has been pocketed in Torun and the Wehrmacht is poised to form another near Lodz.

Before the sun rose, infantry of the 4th and 5th Armee's had reached both banks of the river Odra, this resulted in the Gniezno pocket, an estimated 4-6 infantry divisions of varying strength dwell in the area, along with various high ranking commanders of Armia Poznan. Within the space of hours Armia Poznan was swallowed up and is now more than 100km from the frontline, with no hope of breakout and escape, the Poles in the pocket should surrender quickly. Additionally, the divisions in the pocket suffer from differing levels of exhaustion and disorganization, as our troops have rolled them back time and time again over the past week, bottling them up into a single province before snipping the strings that tether them to their country.


vz1CK3w.png


The Polish defense plan is obvious, abandon provinces east of the river Odra, and retreat to safety behind the Vistula to dig in. In light of this, our offensive plan should be to thwart any hope of Polish survival by preventing the majority of their army from ever reaching the Vistula. We have achieved this on most of the front, however the Krakow region still withstands a complete breakthrough. Polish armies in the north and center of the front have almost been completely pocketed, our generals estimate at least 30% of all enemy military assets have been cut off from the rest of the country.

A single cavalry division had been charged with the defense of Lodz, they had dug in on the eastern banks of the Odra in the province of Sieradz, when our infantry reached there positions at noon. The Polish defenders gave the 72. Infantry Division some trouble while they crossed the river, eventually however, strong aerial and artillery bombardment broke the defenders and forced them out of there fortifications some hours after our troops landed on the eastern bank of the river. It appears the Cavalry division was attempting to hold to province for as long as they could until elements of Armia Poznan could reinforce them, by 15:00 it must have been clear that no relief force was coming. At 16:00, while the enemy was retreating into Lodz to attempt a desperate defense of the city, and strong mechanized spearhead from the north fell upon them, the 2. Motorized Infantry Division from Kutno had been instructed to prevent the division from entering the city, even a small garrison in Lodz would draw forces away from the Warsaw area. A pincer move from the north and south had taken the Polish cavalry completely by surprise, it was not long before their crack defense had completely collapsed. Many Poles were taken prisoner, many more lie dead alongside their horses in Sieradz, the road to Lodz is now clear.


bXAjn7i.png

Elements of the 2. Motorized Division cut through Polish lines.


Recon at 19:00 confirmed the enemy was moving a few divisions from the Warsaw area to garrison Lodz, and were within 30km of the city, however, by then it was too late, our troops were walking the streets of Lodz at dusk. The Polish had also taken a great risk sending troops to defend Lodz, for the whole Lodz Region represented a bulge in our lines, that was undermanned by the enemy, these divisions now gamble with encirclement. By midnight, Warsaw was 80% encircled, and now the Poles hold onto their capital by a string.


20 SEPTEMBER:
The southern front had been slugging along for some time now, the advance has been steady, but slow. In spite of all this, it has only taken the 6th Armee nine days to reach the outskirts of Krakow, while this advance is leagues slower than the rest of the front, it's still set records. Yet this city would not fall in the same fashion of Danzig and Lodz, a formidable and determined Polish army holds the city and the surrounding area, the 6th Armee would have to fight bitterly for Krakow.

At first light, 06:00, nearly 100,000 German troops making up 9 divisions, began the offensive of the Krakow region. The terrain was rough and hilly, which only served to slow our advance, the operation had been planned so that infantry divisions would secure provinces to the north and south of Krakow to allow a broader offense of the city, even so, infantry ended up entering the city before the flanks had started to crumble. By noon, little progress had been made against the Polish defenders.

Nearly 24 hours after the formation of the Gniezno pocket, enemy resistance began breaking down. The battered and broken Polish infantry were surrendering in droves throughout the day. By 18:00, fighting in the pocket had ceased and the last of the enemy had surrendered, in a decesive blow, the Wehrmacht had captured about 50,000 men. The Gniezno pocket represents the low point of Polish resistance, the POW's captured here were some of the saddest troops the Wehrmacht has encountered in Poland thus far, many of the men were fighting wounded, or without weapons, the Polish divisions as a whole were grossly under equipped, as they had to leave most of it behind to attempt escape. News of the victory was immediately publicized and distributed throughout the Reich, Britain and France remained silent.


vWFazk7.png


THE INTERNATIONAL SITUATION:
Our ally, the Empire of Japan, was making progress similar to ours in its own military endeavors. They have been at war with the Republic of China for almost a year now, and they have achieved several major victories, the Chinese southern line has collapsed, and Japanese forces now make a break for the coast of the South China Sea, the Chinese communist forces have been completely surrounded and Japan lies within 150km of the Chinese capital of Nanjing.


EOKrm3r.png


Britain and France continue to sit idle while their eastern ally succumbs to German might, in spite of this, High Command still fears invasion from the west, and the 500,000 troops mobilized on the French border are keep on high alert at all times. Our fortifications are strong, as is our moral, but a combined allied offensive could break our line, therefor Poland must be finished off at once.

The Soviet Union continues to stay within their boarders, even after the Reich has asked them to declare war on Poland per the secret protocols of the Non-aggression pact. Do they still expect a reward? They test the Fuhrers patience, and the Fuhrer is not a patient man. Moreover, Soviet and Japanese relations have broken down even further over several border disputes and small clashes. Intelligence shows the Soviets massing troops against the Japanese puppet state, Manchuko, it is unknown at this time if this is a precautionary action, or preparations for war. Would the Bolsheviks really wage war on an Axis member?

sDvknFs.png
 
Last edited:
All over bar the shouting in Poland, or so it looks like.
 
Yes, poor old Poland, sliced and diced as usual! The slicing appears to be very clinical this time around.

Will the Oberkommando look to switch West and hit the Low Countries and France straight away, or nibble at smaller fish around the margins until spring 1940? You could probably start moving some forces already.
 
Yes, poor old Poland, sliced and diced as usual! The slicing appears to be very clinical this time around.

Will the Oberkommando look to switch West and hit the Low Countries and France straight away, or nibble at smaller fish around the margins until spring 1940? You could probably start moving some forces already.

The Wehrmacht has some cleaning up to do in the north after Poland.
 
how many troops do you have overall?
 
how many troops do you have overall?

About 1.3 million now, 400k on the French border and 900k in Poland. Pretty average, but if you really want some impressive numbers, just wait until you see my navy in a few years, don't forget about Plan Z!
 
The image below shows several AAR's made around the same time as mine. You can see these AARs have a much smaller amount of views than mine, yet they all have significantly more comments. Im confused here, these updates take a long time to make and I feel nobody actually reads them.

lU6vRGU.png
 
The image below shows several AAR's made around the same time as mine. You can see these AARs have a much smaller amount of views than mine, yet they all have significantly more comments. Im confused here, these updates take a long time to make and I feel nobody actually reads them.

lU6vRGU.png
Hmmm, not sure with that. I think some AARs are more engaging, so - whether they get a lot of hits or not - they have a loyal and actively commenting readership.

So I’d probably first be doing two different measures: the number of updates (not replies) vs comments (and then you might have to talk about non-author comments); and the number of hits vs updates.

Then too there is a time factor. I think I’ve noticed (anecdotally, not by any analysis) that an older AAR will proportionally have many more hits because it’s simply been around longer, gets looked up by or searched by new readers (even for inactive AARs), who if they like what they see read through maybe many pages. I know you’ve tried to compare like with like, but it’s a rough science.

I’m not certain how the views are recorded either: every time you look at a new session; or every time a new page is read; or just once for every new reader. If anyone knows, it would be interesting.

For your AAR, I’m curious, have you drawn attention to it in other forums (say reddit or whatever), which might explain a ratio or views per update for your AAR which seem astronomical compared to most! Or maybe it’s just your great graphics and a popular subject (Germany). Maybe yours encourages readers, but not as many commenters? Others go out of their way to invite comments and have conversations.

U-boats is quite a new AAR, has picked a small niche, has many active commenters and has already won some reader awards. I’d judge it popular and successful, even if it doesn’t yet have huge hits. Similar with Early to War.

My own HOI3 AAR has about 24,000 views of 80 chapters. So about 300 views per chapter (whatever a view is). And around 630 replies (though a lot of them would be my own responses to others, but taking the 80-odd chapters out, call it 550 comments and responses. So ‘conversation’ of say 6-7 per chapter. Wouldn’t know how to factor in the time it’s been going (since January). And yes, I put a lot of work into each update, many of which have gone to 6-9 pages of A4 text (not counting images) and 20-25 often quite heavily edited screenshots and pics (though not as slick as yours :)).

I’m happy that people are reading, but probably value loyal and quality commenters the highest. I guess it depends on your frame of reference. Anyway, you raise an interesting point.
 
Last edited:
The image below shows several AAR's made around the same time as mine. You can see these AARs have a much smaller amount of views than mine, yet they all have significantly more comments. Im confused here, these updates take a long time to make and I feel nobody actually reads them.

lU6vRGU.png

It is always disheartening when you see things like this, but I would offer the following observations

1) - Rennslaer is an old-timer - been part of the forum for over ten years and helped write the strategy guides for some earlier PDS games like EU3. Therefore he has a in-built following.
2) - markkur is a more recent member - only been on the forum 6 months or so before you, but he has several AARs, and been a quite active part in the AAR community. Post count is a crude tool - but he has 1400+ posts, which shows a fair bit of activity.
3) - U-boats is a comedy AAR, and while it is not always true well-done comedy AARs tend to get more replies than non-comedy AARs

Essentially Rensslaer and markkur have already established a following here - especially important perhaps in an increasingly less populated subforum like HoI3. And also markkur is writing a sort of AAR that tends to get more posts.

On further note ... back at the start you didn't really interact when people posted. It took a few updates ... people notice that and it can be a disincentive to comment, in my experience.

IMO top two ways to try and boost readership:
1 - Put a link in your signature
2 - Read and comment in other AARs
 
I've got to second the comments here: Here's my AARs and their view count and replies:

Das Morgengrauen des Dritten Reichs : views: 28319, posts: 82
Der Aufstieg des GroBdeutschen Reich : views: 15442, posts: 43

Morgengrauen had 19-ish updates, and a few posts of my own to others--even a question regarding how many people were reading it--Aufstieg had only five updates (I got discouraged because all of my work from the previous AAR was gone after the death of my HD). That post count I see indicates that people are most certainly reading it, but they might not have anything to add, and so they refrain from posting (especially given that this isn't something where people get super involved), and there is a button now that allows us to watch the thread without posting (so no more "subbed" posts bumping up the count).

I also came back to constantly reread and see where I was going, get links, etc, so probably about 500 of those views were my own. :confused:

I've got to also say that with HoI4 out, mostly diehards are the only ones who peruse these boards regularly: I would encourage you to use Reddit to boost views (don't post the update there, just the link).
 
Last edited:
For your AAR, I’m curious, have you drawn attention to it in other forums (say reddit or whatever),

I have seen a couple of the updates linked via Reddit. Redditors are usually pretty bad about commenting here because they will prefer to comment in the Reddit thread (if they comment at all). Also, Reddit has a much larger population of lurkers than this forum does, I believe.

Overall I wouldn't worry about it, @Anthonest - as long as you enjoy making the AAR, and we enjoy reading it, keep on keeping on, I say!
 
NMBi2r3.png



Part XI.
21 SEPTEMBER:
At this point of the Campaign, the fate of Poland is sealed, small numbers of German troops have already begun to trickle back towards the West. Nearly a quarter of all Polish forces are encircled and almost every major objective has been achieved. However, one symbol of Polish resistance still stands: Warsaw. Offensive operations against the capital began at dusk on 19 September and after almost 48 hours progress is looking good. Polish forces dug in about 30km from Lodz, now under German control, and extended their flanks 75km all the way back to Warsaw, were some 3 divisions garrisoned the bombed out city. A bold, and poorly considered, move by the remaining Polish forces, by now they must know we are attempting to encircle the city, why do they intend to defend the bulge in front of the city, rather than abandon it and further garrison their capitol? Nevertheless, we accepted the Polish defensive plan with malice, at 6:00, 21 September, Polish lines around the bulge began to crumble from strong mechanized and armored attacks to the flank, however, Polish lines facing Lodz would hold, being bolstered by an armored division. This would work in our favor, and only serve to trap Polish forces once again, rather than be rolled up into Warsaw. By 15:00, German armor and Schützen had reached the southern and western outskirts of the capitol, while several Polish divisions would remain trapped some 50km away in Glowno.


MU00IVS.png

15:00, 21 September
To the north of the Warsaw region, the encirclement of the city continues as the 5. and 2. Panzer divisions make a pincer move to cut off the city from the rest of the country. Progress is good, even though the Panzer divisions are outnumbered 3:1 in their attack, they advance with ease against the broken and demoralized Polish divisions desperately attempting to hold open the corridor to the city.

In the North, von Manstein's 3. Armee is putting pressure on the Torun pocket. Mass encirclement is new to the German doctrine, and the strategy behind it is still in its infancy, yet von Manstein masterfully manages the 100,000 Polish troops trapped in the pocket. The defenders still offer heavy resistance, even in the face of certain defeat, which has made cleaning up the pocket a difficult job. Polish defenders managed to contain several infantry divisions in Danzig for a few days, until a new assault from the western side of the Torun province and East Prussia broke enemy defenses, forcing 30,000 men to flee further south into the pocket.


bgPm2kF.png

German Schützen advance South of Warsaw.

22 SEPTEMBER:
In the Krakow region to the south, the steady advance of von Rundstedt's 6. Armee continues unimpaired. Wehrmacht troops entered the city of Krakow earlier than the enemy had anticipated during the night of the 21st, the defenders were caught off guard and within hours fighting for the city suburbs had ceased with the Poles retreating to the city center. Several small probing attacks into the urban center were conducted from 5:00-11:00, all of which were promptly repelled in the face of stiff resistance. Fighting for the city center escalated around noon, during which the Luftwaffe would bomb large portions of the enemy defensive line, destroying much of the city.

North of Warsaw, additional Polish forces bolstered the defense of the corridor to the city, throwing in about 30,000 soldiers to aid the crumbling defenders, these forces were presumably stripped from the East Prussian border regions. The effect this had was negligible, yet still served as an annoyance, our Panzers attempting to close the corridor had taken heavy losses from Polish anti-tank weapons and were forced to halt their advance for some hours until more infantry arrived to support them.


8jmMJIw.png

Midday, 23 September

23 SEPTEMBER:
Early in the morning, slowly at first, Polish defenders in Krakow began to retreat from the city in large numbers, the city center was firmly in German hands by the time the sun rose, and Luftwaffe bombers had begun devastating Polish supply lines pouring into the city from the east, leaving the defense untenable. Our troops continued to push into the suburbs east of the city until about 15:00, when the city was declared to be under German control. The Poles were forced to abandon the city because they were unable to reinforce it due to German troops attacking them at all fronts, stifling the movement of enemy troops for an elastic defense. The troops on the southern front would be permitted 12 hours of rest before continuing the advance.

The Torun pocket has been squeezed even further in the last 24 hours, von Manstein had ruthlessly capitalized on the breakthrough south of Danzig, and now Polish troops are rapidly being forced into a single province. There has also been a great decline of Polish moral within the pocket, as can been seen by the droves of enemy PoW's coming from the region. Conditions within the pocket must be miserable by now, a constant flurry of bullets and bodies, it can be assured not a single Pole will get 8 hours of sleep before their encampment is overrun.


qn1pX7k.png

Reinvigorated southern offensive.

sDvknFs.png