You can wait for the droids or just make your faction angry for 10 years, it'd probably be worth it
You should be able to, but why not uplift the presentients? They have the correct habitability.I noticed clicking around on my own colonized planets that I can terraform the ones I have pops on if I have a particular third terraforming tech. If I somehow manage to get that tech as well, could I terraform the planet with the presentients on it without hurting them?
How do I uplift them? That would definitely be my preference, but the button is greyed out.
Edit: Oh I see. I need Epigenetic Triggers first. Can I uplift them even if I haven't colonized the planet yet?
I think the reasoning is that creating a machine vassal would be like cutting off your arm (or a piece of your brain) and making it a vassal. They are a gestalt intelligence.I find that the option to create a Vassal is grayed out for some reason. Am I really not able to create a machine intelligence vassal as a machine intelligence?
I viewed it as if I was severing a part of the whole that is me, to create a new entity subservient to me. One would think that would be within the power of a machine intelligence to create a new one.I think the reasoning is that creating a machine vassal would be like cutting off your arm (or a piece of your brain) and making it a vassal. They are a gestalt intelligence.
No problem!
2) AFAIK flying in and out of it with a science shop still works.
3) Disenfranchisement just means they have no political power (they aren’t full citizens). Also they care about keeping core worlds for citizens and slaves or just citizens. The isolationist faction, which you will get if you’re pacifist, doesn’t even care if the Xenos are citizens. They *really* hate war though and are anti-immigrant.
Both these constitute disenfrahcnisement, so the xenos (even the ones that are free under caste) will get -10% happiness and their ethics won't count towards faction proportions.'Disenfranchise' == 'residence' or 'caste system (residence)'
Essentially, no.Is there any way to keep materialists pleased if you lose tech lead?
This seems like something of an overreaction considering that faction happiness is almost totally irrelevant and your failure to maintain it will not inconvenience you in any way.Is it time to just abandon this game?
Essentially, no.
This seems like something of an overreaction considering that faction happiness is almost totally irrelevant and your failure to maintain it will not inconvenience you in any way.
Well given that influence has a baseline of +2, even if all your factions hate your guts, I don't really see how you can have an "influence gain [that] doesn't exist".It's a huge lose of influence, and since there is nothing left for me to use to fulfill mandates left, my influence gain doesn't exist. Granted I've won the game already, just wanted to see if I could take on the crisis, but I am so strapped for influence I can't expand to recover my economy (my federation went massive early, so I didn't have anyone to make a tributary. I have one intensely angry spirtualist faction that is ~20% of my pops, and then another 15% that is the now never to be happy unless the science nexus lets me catch up materialists.
Well given that influence has a baseline of +2, even if all your factions hate your guts, I don't really see how you can have an "influence gain [that] doesn't exist".
Is there any way to keep materialists pleased if you lose tech lead? I went from single planet to tall, lost my tech lead when my federation ally devoured an F, and now my influence is crashed because materialists are angry over dull edge. Is it time to just abandon this game?
Last time it happen I had to to lead an Allied force (about half of it was still meAnyone here with experience from The War in Heaven? Its year 32 and counting and after occupying the vassal planets both FE's are just sitting in their capital systems. Will they ever move?
Last time it happen I had to to lead an Allied force (about half of it was still me) to take them out maybe they think the neutral team is too strong?