• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Osteles

Rather evil GM
37 Badges
Sep 21, 2002
699
18
Visit site
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Stellaris: Megacorp
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Stellaris: Lithoids
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Stellaris: Necroids
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Europa Universalis III: Chronicles
  • Divine Wind
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Sword of the Stars
  • Sword of the Stars II
  • 500k Club
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Pillars of Eternity
As the title sais.
Beria...
An illuster, yet interesting figure...

What is your opinion on the man (post-Stalin)?
It is believed he sought a closer cooperation with the West. True or popular belief? Could he be trusted?
What was his goal for this? I myself would consider him staunchly anti-West.
What actually provoked his fall from power? Wiki is in my opinion not clear on it as it sais the main reason is actually his approach to the West. Would the Soviet nations been more free under him instead under Chrutsjov?
 
An absolute monster, and maybe the biggest mass rapist since Genghis Kahn.
Well, Beria was pretty mild comparing to his predecessors - Yagoda and Yezhov... He rather eased purges in the late 30s.
 
In 2016 I read a Finnish book, Berijan tarhat (The farms of Beria), it's a book written by Unto Parvilahti and it's based on his own experiences during captivity in Siberia prison camps after Finland's exit from the World War II.

The book is often compared to Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago, they share so much similar. After the Continuation War the Allied Control Comission sent a claim for the Finns to cede 19 individuals for the Soviets. Parvilahti and 18 others were imprisoned in Finland and handed over the Soviets as prisoners.

Parvilahti was sentenced because he had volunteered in Finnish SS-battalion. He spent 10 years in captivity in several prison/labor camps in Siberia, but survived. In his book Parvilahti tells and describes the conditions of the camps and the life in there. It is absolutely depressing and shocking to read.

Lavrentiy Beria is heavily responsible of the Soviet forced labor camp system which existed still in 1950s.
 
One of the most underrated criminals of the 20th century.
 
Would the Soviet nations been more free under him instead under Chrutsjov?
It is possible, both Beria and Khrushchev followed Stalin's line while Stalin was alive and after his Death began follow other lines. Nikita Khrushchev who eventually won the Power struggle was one of the worst offenders during the great purges as far as I know, playing along with Stalin and afterwards turning against him with destalinzation.

Don't think Beria was any more different from Khrushchev in that regard. They would do whatever appeased the boss, and afterwards turn against him. Beria eventually lost the Power struggle and was executed, probably to a degree because of the liberalisation reforms.
 
Only thing Beria deserved :


[yes, as historical as Inglorious Bastards ; on purpose]
 
Only thing Beria deserved :


[yes, as historical as Inglorious Bastards ; on purpose]
No one deserves lynching like this.
 
No one deserves lynching like this.
You are right. I just saw this (wonderful imo) movie and wanted to find a way to put it in. Unlike in real life, in the movie they make sure to get rid of him for motives that applies only to Beria (rapes & betraying the country), not stuff like wrongfull executions.
 
Comrade, there is no such thing as wrongfull executions, only preemptive actions against counterrevolutionary dissidents.
And Capitalist/Imperialist Spy!
 
Comrade, there is no such thing as wrongfull executions, only preemptive actions against what might have been, if given the chance, counterrevolutionary dissidents.
Fixed.

The execution in the movie was quite appalling, BTW.
 
Beria was a Paradox of a man. On one hand a horrible individual who committed despicable acts on national and personal level. On the other hand one of the few people and perhaps the only one that could have saved the SU from its decline, becoming a pariah state and gradual dissolution.
 
In 2016 I read a Finnish book, Berijan tarhat (The farms of Beria), it's a book written by Unto Parvilahti and it's based on his own experiences during captivity in Siberia prison camps after Finland's exit from the World War II.

The book is often compared to Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago, they share so much similar. After the Continuation War the Allied Control Comission sent a claim for the Finns to cede 19 individuals for the Soviets. Parvilahti and 18 others were imprisoned in Finland and handed over the Soviets as prisoners.

Parvilahti was sentenced because he had volunteered in Finnish SS-battalion. He spent 10 years in captivity in several prison/labor camps in Siberia, but survived. In his book Parvilahti tells and describes the conditions of the camps and the life in there. It is absolutely depressing and shocking to read.

Lavrentiy Beria is heavily responsible of the Soviet forced labor camp system which existed still in 1950s.

Beria was a disgusting man, but OTOH Parvilahti absolutely deserved to be gulaged and I have zero sympathy for an SS member.