Cologne comes to my mind, it was abandoned after WW2 and left to the mutations caused by Allied bombs.
Many cities in Europe that were prominent in the Roman era either no longer exist, or were totally destroyed and then later on some other city was founded on or near the original site.
Could you give me some examples?
And as per the OP and Henry IX's post, if a city is rebuilt on the same spot after being razed, I would count that as continuous habitation and as the same city. Sometime between Acquincum and Budapest, the area might have deteriorated to merely a village, but the area was in continuous habitation since the Romans, and very likely since well before them.
Could you give me some examples?
And as per the OP and Henry IX's post, if a city is rebuilt on the same spot after being razed, I would count that as continuous habitation and as the same city. Sometime between Acquincum and Budapest, the area might have deteriorated to merely a village, but the area was in continuous habitation since the Romans, and very likely since well before them.
Similarly all along the East Yorkshire coast there have been towns and settlements that were lost to coastal erosion. Even very big ones like Ravenser Odd.There are a bunch of towns in Scotland and Northern Ireland that were once built on coastal sites. As the coast rebounded from glaciation and sea leaves simultaneously rose some of them wound up landlocked and wasted away, and others wound up swallowed by the sea and this abandoned. Numerous sites in what is now the North Sea were abandoned when the region known as doggerland was submerged. A variety of coastal sites in France and Northern Italy that were once constructed at natural harbors were abandoned when they silted up due to changes in river courses or advancement of river deltas. In Ancient Greece a number of city sites got abandoned when changes in trade patterns or political boundaries or technology rendered them no longer useful. For example a set of boat skids and portage roads to portage across the thinnest point connecting the Mycenaean peninsula was a key strategic point with considerable cities at both ends. Then a rise in size of merchant ships, and increase in using wind instead of oats for their propulsion rendered the ‘shortcut’ not useful.
My family is duty-bound to the 16th generation to patrol the borders of the Rhineland and send any of those abominations back to whatever 'car-nie-wall' is.Cologne comes to my mind, it was abandoned after WW2 and left to the mutations caused by Allied bombs.
There are a bunch of towns in Scotland and Northern Ireland that were once built on coastal sites. As the coast rebounded from glaciation and sea leaves simultaneously rose some of them wound up landlocked and wasted away, and others wound up swallowed by the sea and this abandoned.
Rainfall.Reading through @Semper Victor's excellent Sassanian thread, I was stuck by the frequent mention of cities which had been wholly abandoned by ~1000 CE, never to be refounded.
However, a cursory google search reveals that wholly abandoned cities are extremely uncommon in Europe, and are only a thing in the US because they were single-resource boom towns, which never diversified.
How common was if, in the timeframe of lets say 476-2018, for a city (not a village) to be abandoned and never rebuilt, refunded? Is my impression that this is very common in the ME correct, and why?
That's not how bacteria or disease usually works, so your suspicion is likely way off.
Some pathogens can survive outside a host body for remarkable amount of time, with anthrax being a good example. You are correct that it isn't very common, however, and I personally believe that it would only have been minor settlements that were abandoned for such reasons.
If we understand abandonded as all meaningful economic activity ceasing and the population dwindling with no natural increase I would argue a few examples: Gamla Uppsala, Birka.
I would also move that many Towns (Tun, Köpingar) should be understood as disappeared as their formative and main economic activity ceased and while a town or village exists in the same spot it is not the same village or town that existed before. Köpingsvik, Uppåkra, Berga for example.
Arguably places like Harg and Gamleby were indeed abandonded, Harg being a works village but Gamleby being an actual town which saw no economic progress until 400-years after its forced evacuation (that story has 7 twists to it though.)