.png){kind=avatar}
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Hello there random.org, who shall receive my day 1 vote?
Rolled 13, whose signup number is this?
Oh...
Rolled 11, whose signup number is this?
VOTE RANDAKAR
Rolled 13, whose signup number is this?
Oh...
Rolled 11, whose signup number is this?
VOTE RANDAKAR
I'll try to do the first. The second .. well, not going to oblige you there.
But maybe somebody else will.
LOL
There is this myth that silencers exist but apparently they aren't that good, either. At least according to Mythbusters ;-)
Cymsdale is an old hand, I really doubt it.
But hey, it's as good a reason as any.
One.
Two.
I don't know drupplesnub either, but new players around is nice. Let's not kill him immediately.
Or do, then at least he knows how vicious werewolf really is
.. and three.
Vote Capibara
The PSST. I like the acronym.
In that case my vote is following the RSST ;-)
LOL.
That's basically what day 1 is all about ;-)
Vote Drupplesnub.
He revenge voted.
Looks like it, doesn't it?
In that case, carry on.
It would be a revenge revenge vote if Cymsdale were to unvote drupple and then revote him.
This is just a reactionary anti revenge vote
Oh, thanks?
Obviously this means somebody should vote you for voting graf zeppelin for voting alxeu for voting drupplesnub for voting cymsdale .. ;-)
Oh hey, looks like my RSST vote landed in the right place
Official votecount (6 hours 48 minutes to deadline - valid as of post #109)
Cymsdale: 2
Wagonlitz (93)
Druplesnubb (98)
Druplesnubb: 2
Cymsdale (94)
alxeu (99)
Claude LC: 1
Capibara (95)
JermanTK: 1
Panzer Commader (96)
alxeu: 1
Graf Zeppelin (102)
randakar: 1
beartjah (104)
Graf Zeppelin: 1
Claude LC (106)
Capibara: 1
randakar (109)
Not voted: 6
@alynkio
@aedan777
@EUROO7
@JermanTK
Xarkan
Caillean
Last edited by a moderator:
Also, please bold your votes so that they are easier to read.
I didn't miss any this time but can not guarantee this not to happen at a frantic deadline time
I didn't miss any this time but can not guarantee this not to happen at a frantic deadline time
Well you missed randakar and that guy had both bolded and size 6 letters.
Actually, Unvote Cymsdale, Vote JermanTK. We need to hound the ones who aren't participating, and Jerman already has a vote and is thus easier to lynch.
Indeed. I even saw the vote very clearly upon reading the post for the first time, then decided to skip it for some reason when doing the votecount. My apologies @randakar .
Count corrected
Ah, a new player has already picked up on CAWZ without us telling him about it.
Good ;-)
No worries.
Unvote Capibara
Vote Cymsdale
Let's try to have a few less people on one vote and a few more on more than one ;-)
I liked having cymsdale and druplesnubb trying to kill each other, and I'd like to know where cyms' allegiance lies since he's kinda difficult to read.
I've palyed tons of games on other forums and also a previous game on this site. Don't know what CAWZ stands for, though.
Crusade/Coalition/Campaign against Werewolf Zombies (people who aren't active)
While these are definitely cooler, I'm afraid there should be only one S, so PST and RST, unless we want to call them something like Randakar's Strange School of Thought
I like to see Jerman gaining votes. More on here everyone, let's lynch Jerman or see if he shows up at least!
Thought for the day: A wise man learns from the death of others
Last edited:
Fascist Alynkio reporting for duty!
Why do we suffer the weak to live? What kind of man could live with himself knowing he is nothing but a burden to his fellows and that he is dependent upon them for his welfare? In a world of scarcity, as a polity devoted to the waging of war, we do not have the resources to waste on those who cannot provide for themselves. A man who cannot pull his own weight cannot rightly call himself a man, and we would be correct and wise to end the lives of such people. The weak must die that the strong might thrive!
Might we euthanize the weak mercifully and swiftly? A quick and unceremonious bullet to the head, an overdose of an inexpensive opiate perhaps? Such an approach has merits -- cost effectiveness and simplicity primarily. The truly wise, however, know that at lest a few of the invalids and beggars too cowardly to take their own lives with honor must be slaughtered cruelly and brutally in public that all might know that weakness will not be tolerated. The elderly and less capable among us need not fear summary murder, however; so long as one can contribute to the polity in some small way one may keep one's honor intact.
Some might argue that these sentiments are barbaric, cruel, inhuman... evil, even! Weak, mewling cowards might think so, but true men know that just as one cuts off a gangrenous finger to save the hand from spreading rot, so must we cull the weak to prevent our people from growing soft. This amounts to nothing more than a people choosing to manage its resources efficiently, and to value physical and spiritual strength and accomplishment over womanly feelings of empathy. Only thus may the great Paradoxian people stand tall against their enemies and withstand the onslaught of merciless nature. Surely a value or tradition that lends strength and longevity to the people that embrace it cannot appropriately be labelled evil! Rather, the wisdom to set aside the weakness of compassion and see things as they truly are is among the greatest of goods!
Thus, we must ask ourselves who among our current group is the most deserving of culling. Having respect for the chain of commad and appropriately valuing obedience to one's superiors, and noting that he has yet to appear and defend himself from the accusations of weakness I will defer to the decorated Panzer Commader and smash this TIE like I have the skulls of so many reds.
(Also, I'm happy to see Drupples back, and Clymsdale I also understand to be returning after a long absence, so I'm disinclined to vote them day 1 for slightly meta reasons)
VOTE JERMAN
Why do we suffer the weak to live? What kind of man could live with himself knowing he is nothing but a burden to his fellows and that he is dependent upon them for his welfare? In a world of scarcity, as a polity devoted to the waging of war, we do not have the resources to waste on those who cannot provide for themselves. A man who cannot pull his own weight cannot rightly call himself a man, and we would be correct and wise to end the lives of such people. The weak must die that the strong might thrive!
Might we euthanize the weak mercifully and swiftly? A quick and unceremonious bullet to the head, an overdose of an inexpensive opiate perhaps? Such an approach has merits -- cost effectiveness and simplicity primarily. The truly wise, however, know that at lest a few of the invalids and beggars too cowardly to take their own lives with honor must be slaughtered cruelly and brutally in public that all might know that weakness will not be tolerated. The elderly and less capable among us need not fear summary murder, however; so long as one can contribute to the polity in some small way one may keep one's honor intact.
Some might argue that these sentiments are barbaric, cruel, inhuman... evil, even! Weak, mewling cowards might think so, but true men know that just as one cuts off a gangrenous finger to save the hand from spreading rot, so must we cull the weak to prevent our people from growing soft. This amounts to nothing more than a people choosing to manage its resources efficiently, and to value physical and spiritual strength and accomplishment over womanly feelings of empathy. Only thus may the great Paradoxian people stand tall against their enemies and withstand the onslaught of merciless nature. Surely a value or tradition that lends strength and longevity to the people that embrace it cannot appropriately be labelled evil! Rather, the wisdom to set aside the weakness of compassion and see things as they truly are is among the greatest of goods!
Thus, we must ask ourselves who among our current group is the most deserving of culling. Having respect for the chain of commad and appropriately valuing obedience to one's superiors, and noting that he has yet to appear and defend himself from the accusations of weakness I will defer to the decorated Panzer Commader and smash this TIE like I have the skulls of so many reds.
(Also, I'm happy to see Drupples back, and Clymsdale I also understand to be returning after a long absence, so I'm disinclined to vote them day 1 for slightly meta reasons)
VOTE JERMAN
JermanTK: 3
Panzer Commader (96)
Druplesnubb (98 Cymsdale -> 114)
Alynkio (119)
Cymsdale: 2
Wagonlitz (93)
randakar (109 Capibara -> 116)
Druplesnubb: 2
Cymsdale (94)
alxeu (99)
Claude LC: 1
Capibara (95)
alxeu: 1
Graf Zeppelin (102)
randakar: 1
beartjah (104)
Graf Zeppelin: 1
Claude LC (106)
Not voted: 5
@aedan777
@EUROO7
@JermanTK
@Xarkan
@Caillean
Is that... Is that a fascist formulation of CAWZ? It's beautiful, I must say.
Also, this game may be the one time in years where having chosen my username when I was 12 is actually a fortunate thing...
Thought for the day: A coward’s only reward is to live in fear another day.
Panzer Commader (96)
Druplesnubb (98 Cymsdale -> 114)
Alynkio (119)
Cymsdale: 2
Wagonlitz (93)
randakar (109 Capibara -> 116)
Druplesnubb: 2
Cymsdale (94)
alxeu (99)
Claude LC: 1
Capibara (95)
alxeu: 1
Graf Zeppelin (102)
randakar: 1
beartjah (104)
Graf Zeppelin: 1
Claude LC (106)
Not voted: 5
@aedan777
@EUROO7
@JermanTK
@Xarkan
@Caillean
Is that... Is that a fascist formulation of CAWZ? It's beautiful, I must say.
Also, this game may be the one time in years where having chosen my username when I was 12 is actually a fortunate thing...
Thought for the day: A coward’s only reward is to live in fear another day.
Last edited: