Would it be a correct statement to say that in a battleship vs battleship engagement, the Yamato's would simply annihilate any other battleship in history with ease?
Would it be a correct statement to say that in a battleship vs battleship engagement, the Yamato's would simply annihilate any other battleship in history with ease?
The American Iowa class battleships are severely outclassed in armor and firepower by the Yamato's. The Yamato's turret armor and conning tower were entirely impervious to the 16 inch guns of the Iowas. And i'd imagine the 16 inch guns would have trouble penetrating anywhere on the Japanese ship, the belt armor was 410mm thick, making it nearly immune to the 16 inch guns. While the 18 inch guns of the Yamato wouldn't have too much trouble going through even the thicker parts of the Iowa. The Only advantages the Iowa has is speed and better radar."Yamato and Musashi, the largest and most powerfully built ships in history (although perhaps at some disadvantage relative to the American Iowas)"
Yamato would be anihilated before it would come in sight of any American battleship, due to their superior fire control systems coupled with radarsWould it be a correct statement to say that in a battleship vs battleship engagement, the Yamato's would simply annihilate any other battleship in history with ease?
So you can hit the Yamato first before they hit you. What do you think happens then? They laugh at you because 16 inch guns cannot penetrate the 26 inch thick turret armor of the Yamato. Nor can they penetrate its Conning tower, or even the Belt armor for that matter, and even the deck is 8 inches thick, making it resistant to long range plunging fire. This may be an exaggeration, but I wouldn't be surprised if it would take at least 4 US battleships to out muscle a single Yamato class.Yamato would be anihilated before it would come in sight of any American battleship, due to their superior fire control systems coupled with radars![]()
I think you overrate Yamato's armor. She was destroyed with airplane bombs IRL, I don't think 16" AP shells were less destructive.So you can hit the Yamato first before they hit you. What do you think happens then? They laugh at you because 16 inch guns cannot penetrate the 26 inch thick turret armor of the Yamato. Nor can they penetrate its Conning tower, or even the Belt armor for that matter, and even the deck is 8 inches thick, making it resistant to long range plunging fire. This may be an exaggeration, but I wouldn't be surprised if it would take at least 4 US battleships to out muscle a single Yamato class.
They laugh at you because 16 inch guns cannot penetrate the 26 inch thick turret armor of the Yamato.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamato-class_battleship#Armour Maybe you should have looked harder. Right there in the armor section "The armour on the main-turrets surpassed even that of the main-belt, with turret face plating 650 millimetres (26 in) thick.[6" Not to mention the 410mm belt of the Yamato was inclined, i.e. sloped. At that angle the effective armor has to be 500mm+. And no, British 14" guns will not be penetrating that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamat...File:Yamato-armorsheme-DE_-_magazines_cut.svgI am not sure where you are getting your numbers from. A cursory glance of wikipedia suggests that the Belt armour of Yamato was 410mm at the waterline which could be penetrated at 15,000 yards (about 14km) by the British 14" gun of the KGV class. That is already at the edge of visual range.
A website called The National Interest did a nice piece about this question and they had Yamato slug it out with the Bismarck and Tirpitz, here is a piece of it:
So you can hit the Yamato first before they hit you. What do you think happens then?
There is no naval gun ever mounted on any ship that can penetrate the 26 inch thick turret armor or the 20 inch thick Conning Tower. Even the 410mm/16 inch belt armor would be resistant to any naval gun because its inclined/sloped/angled.That was cringeworthy.
Historically the side that started hitting first tended to win. In any case, I doubt Yamato had anywhere near the kind of immunity you ascribe to it, looking at penetration tables we seem to be at best talking about 10km immune zone, similar that Yamato was designed to have against her own guns.
There is no naval gun ever mounted on any ship that can penetrate the 26 inch thick turret armor or the 20 inch thick Conning Tower. Even the 410mm/16 inch belt armor would be resistant to any naval gun because its inclined/sloped/angled.
For one or two hits, maybe. Consult with Bismarck's crew what happens when a ship is hit countlessly.There is no naval gun ever mounted on any ship that can penetrate the 26 inch thick turret armor or the 20 inch thick Conning Tower. Even the 410mm/16 inch belt armor would be resistant to any naval gun because its inclined/sloped/angled.
Thats a fair point, but when there is 18 inch guns firing back at the Americans and their 16 inch guns, id imagine in a mid range slug fest the America ships will be critically damaged long before the Yamato would be.For one or two hits, maybe. Consult with Bismarck's crew what happens when a ship is hit countlessly.
Thats a fair point, but when there is 18 inch guns firing back at the Americans and their 16 inch guns, id imagine in a mid range slug fest the America ships will be critically damaged long before the Yamato would be.
How absurd. While the US ships did have world class radars...the Yamato had world class optics. In mid range it is more than capable of hitting its target.The US has vastly superior fire control. Those 18 inch guns are worthless if you arent going to hit anything.
Not to mention the 410mm belt of the Yamato was inclined, i.e. sloped. At that angle the effective armor has to be 500mm+.
How absurd. While the US ships did have world class radars...the Yamato had world class optics. In mid range it is more than capable of hitting its target.
...and distance.Optics.
Smoke.
That's why it wouldn't develop into a midrange slugfest. The Iowa class ship would maintain range as best it could, using radar and superior fire control to score hits beyond the effective range of Yamato's own targeting systems. Unless Yamato scored a couple of lucky hits in return at those ranges, it would likely end up effectively disabled and badly torn up from bow to stern, although nowhere near to sinking, by the time the Iowa ran low on ammunition and withdrew.Thats a fair point, but when there is 18 inch guns firing back at the Americans and their 16 inch guns, id imagine in a mid range slug fest the America ships will be critically damaged long before the Yamato would be.
I said the Japanese radar wasn't as good, not non existent. I doubt staying out of sight range was a viable tactic at the time, since It was almost never done by Battleships of the time period. When the HMS prince of wales caught up to the Bismark they eneded up getting to Point blank range for example....and distance.
USS Iowa was faster than Yamato. She was able to keep distance out of sight range, while shelling back on the basis of radar coupled fire control system.