• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Hi everyone!

My name is Ivan Grozev and I've been working as a game designer at Haemimont Games for more than six years now. I've been fan of Paradox Interactive's games for decades. I've enjoyed thousands of hours of Europa Universalis and Crusaders Kings, always striving to achieve the next world conquest, and I've always loved large scale, long-term games. There's a saying in the design team that we've made a game especially for me. Frankly, I've loved working on Surviving Mars since the start and I'm excited with my current position as the Lead Game Designer for this project.

1.png


Today, I have the honor to briefly introduce to you the second expansion of Surviving Mars, Green Planet.

So, how did it all start? The inevitable truth that surviving Mars' barren deserts would eventually lead to humanity changing the Red Planet has stuck with us since we started working on Surviving Mars over 2 years ago. Back then, we didn't know what the future of Mars would look like, but we did envision that one day we would add terraforming. The growing desire for more late game content among our fans made this vision more and more appealing, as terraforming an entire planet would be a gradual and painstaking process. Believe me, we strived to make it challenging but worthwhile!

In Green Planet, you'll be able to fully transform the Martian surface. Starting with endless, barren deserts and leading to frozen ice caps and fields of lichen, and finally ending with a planet covered with lush green forests and oceans. You'll be able to plant different types of vegetation all across your colony, dig artificial lakes and fill them with water that freezes or evaporates according to the average global temperature, decrease the severity of dust storms as atmosphere improves and watch Moisture Vaporators produce more because of oceans evaporating water into the atmosphere.

In order to do so, you need to achieve progress on four major terraforming parameters: Atmosphere, Temperature, Water, and Vegetation.

2.png


The Atmosphere parameter symbolizes the density and the content of the Martian atmosphere. At 100% Atmosphere terraforming progress, Mars has an Earth-like atmosphere and deep blue skies, capable of sustaining human breathing without artificial aid. There are several ways to improve this parameter, varying from mass production of greenhouse gases to melting the polar ice caps. Initially, it's easy to improve the atmosphere; however, its raising density means that more and more gases are lost due to Mars’ lack of a strong magnetic field. To continue the process, the need for magnetic shields in orbit and massive magnetic generators arises.

The Temperature parameter symbolizes the average planetary temperature. It's necessary for liquid water to exist on the surface of Mars and for more advanced plant life to survive the extreme Martian conditions. The increasing temperature creates conditions for the polar ice caps to melt and changes the existing ice fields into blue lakes, seas, and oceans. Higher average temperature also means that cold waves are shorter and less likely to occur.

The Water parameter symbolizes the amount of water accumulated in the atmosphere and in water bodies on the surface of the planet. Water is a major ingredient in the making of acidic and pure-water rains. It directly affects the output of Moisture Vaporators and is required for more advanced plant life to grow and spread.

The Vegetation parameter symbolizes the sustainability of plant life on the planet. Initially, plant life consists of adapted cyanobacteria and lichen but it will eventually form huge, continent-wide forests. This parameter directly affects the spreading of plants around your colony. On one side, it increases the likelihood that locally seeded plants will spread on their own. On the other side, it guarantees that, over time, seeds carried by the wind will grow in various locations on the map.

3.png


You're probably asking yourselves "How could I achieve all that?". You'll notice that Green Planet has added a new technology field, Terraforming, in your Research UI. The 20 new techs there are harder to research but will allow you to start terraforming whenever you feel ready for the challenge. To begin, just unlock the first building in the tech tree. You achieve terraforming progress by constructing and maintaining terraforming-related buildings, or by completing dedicated terraforming projects such as sending rockets to capture ice asteroids. We're going to talk more about these in the following dev diaries.

Speaking of which, next week on Thursday we’ll have another dev diary all about the new buildings and wonders coming in Green Planet.

Ivan Grozev
Lead Designer of Green Planet
Haemimont Games

4.png
 
There's one that I saw in the video:

Designed Forestation
Newly grown forests have a chance to spawn Vistas and Research Sites.

sm breakthrough designed forestation.png
 
Given the fact I'm the only person to downvote this, this is likely an unpopular opinion; which is fine. But this sickens me.

They (Russia) knew she would die; the satellite they’d built wasn’t equipped for a safe reentry. After spending a few terrifying days alone above the Earth, Laika would be euthanized with poison in her dog food anyway, even if she didn't die in 7 hours.

Sputnik 2 was little bigger than a washing machine. Inside, Laika wouldn’t even have enough space to turn around, and, to make sure she didn’t, she would be chained in a single spot. She would have the freedom to sit and to lie down and to do nothing else.

Laika wasn’t even launched that day. For the next three days, she was grounded inside the spacecraft in a space no bigger than a washing machine, waiting on Earth. There had been a malfunction that had to be repaired, and so Laika was kept in freezing cold temperatures, unable to move. The scientists did their best to take care of her (except, you know.. save her.)

Laika died in excruciating pain.

There is nothing nice in this. There is nothing honourable in this. Laika was killed for the sake human curiosity; for pure human arrogance. It's disgusting.
But sure, let's name a DLC pack after an act of animal cruelty.
GG guys, GG.
 
So we shouldn't keep her memory alive? Better to hide our "mistakes"?
Not at all, nor did I suggest that.

Laika went from the streets, to spending months locked in increasingly smaller cages.
Then right at the end, one scientist took her home to his family where they gave her a few days of love; gave her the experience of a life in a warm home, soft bed and good food, with a loving family and children to play with.. only to take her away from that, stuff her into a washing machine, and have her spend three days in the freezing cold, after which she is blasted into space where she would die several hours later, terrified, alone and in pain.

We, humans, did that to her. We don't get to act like she made some ultimate sacrifice; or that it's somehow noble that she died so we could go to space.

There are other ways to commemorate her, and I don't believe a DLC that shoots animals to Mars is the way to do it. That pisses all over her memory, and the cruelty she went through, IMHO.

EDIT: Edited post to try to come across less angry/ranty.
 
Last edited:
Not at all, nor did I suggest that.

Laika went from the streets, to spending months locked in increasingly smaller cages.
Then right at the end, one scientist took her home to his family where they gave her a few days of love; gave her the experience of a life in a warm home, soft bed and good food, with a loving family and children to play with.. only to take her away from that, stuff her into a washing machine, and have her spend three days in the freezing cold, after which she is blasted into space where she would die several hours later, terrified, alone and in pain.

We, humans, did that to her. We don't get to act like she made some ultimate sacrifice; or that it's somehow noble that she died so we could go to space.

There are other ways to commemorate her, and I don't believe a DLC that shoots animals to Mars is the way to do it. That pisses all over her memory, and the cruelty she went through, IMHO.

EDIT: Edited post to try to come across less angry/ranty.

Yes, we do get to act like she died nobly. Humans were not going to be the first animals in space. Either her life matters enough that we can assign nobility to her death, or it matters so little that it doesn’t matter what happened to her.
 
Yes, we do get to act like she died nobly. Humans were not going to be the first animals in space. Either her life matters enough that we can assign nobility to her death, or it matters so little that it doesn’t matter what happened to her.
Yes, forcing an animal that cannot comprehend it's situation into situations of pain and extreme stress is oh so noble. Whatever you tell yourself to justify animal cruelty dude.
 
Yes, forcing an animal that cannot comprehend it's situation into situations of pain and extreme stress is oh so noble. Whatever you tell yourself to justify animal cruelty dude.

Its level of comprehension is, by definition, too low to comprehend what is going on. You can’t teach a lab animal that it is going to be experimented upon to determine safety measures for humans. Its not a matter of cruelty. Cruelty would be sending a human up without testing spaceflight on an animal.
 
Yes, forcing an animal that cannot comprehend it's situation into situations of pain and extreme stress is oh so noble. Whatever you tell yourself to justify animal cruelty dude.
Sure, a human going up and sacrificing himself (this was back in the sixties) would be noble, but I'd 100% and happily send 100 fidos to their deaths instead of one human.
 
We appreciate the discussion @Zhon Daeli and it is something that we discussed internally. I also personally read a lot of public comments on our social media when the community suggested Laika (it was independently proposed on EVERY social media account we have) - in order to understand the sentiment of why they wanted to name the pack after Laika

I'd like to share a few points:
  1. I'd be interested in your sources, as when I did my own research I found a LOT of discrepancies in reports about Laika. Some mentioned animal cruelty, some specifically stated that she was well taken care of. In an era where there was a lot of propaganda against Russia, it's hard to tell fact from fiction

  2. It is true that Laika was sent to her death, but it wasn't out of human curiosity - rather, space flight and the associated leaps in technology that came from it were "a giant leap for mankind" and that is the reason why Laika's death was necessary, and is honored to this day

  3. We do NOT advocate nor honor animal cruelty in any form. However, we can't change the past, only advocate for better treatment of animals in the future. In that sense, we think naming a pet/animal pack after Laika is fitting. In a way, it brings awareness to Laika and can be a tool in promoting better treatment of animals
I hope that our reasoning is understandable to you, and even if we disagree that you feel respected in your opinion. We really do appreciate you sharing them!
 
I'd like to share a few points:
  1. I'd be interested in your sources, as when I did my own research I found a LOT of discrepancies in reports about Laika. Some mentioned animal cruelty, some specifically stated that she was well taken care of. In an era where there was a lot of propaganda against Russia, it's hard to tell fact from fiction
Perhaps an acknowledgement that the Soviets were notorious for secrecy and propaganda, themselves, would be appropriate. To imply, through only mentioning anti-communist propaganda, that that particular type makes discerning the truth difficult, is not the most accurate way to present the situation.

Ain't PR fun?
 
We appreciate the discussion @Zhon Daeli and it is something that we discussed internally.
I'm glad you had the discussion, though not so much the outcome. :)

I also personally read a lot of public comments on our social media when the community suggested Laika (it was independently proposed on EVERY social media account we have) - in order to understand the sentiment of why they wanted to name the pack after Laika
I understand why people suggested it, I just disagree with it.
I know I'm a minority voice here, but I strongly dissaprove the use of animals as test subjects.

I'd like to share a few points:
I'd be interested in your sources, as when I did my own research I found a LOT of discrepancies in reports about Laika. Some mentioned animal cruelty, some specifically stated that she was well taken care of. In an era where there was a lot of propaganda against Russia, it's hard to tell fact from fiction
I agree and I don't have any special source. Like many people I'd heard of Laika and what she went through; though I did try to verify what I'd heard. Some of it was true, some of it not. I believe what information I could gather from sites like Wikipedia (following sources therein), historycollection.co and so on. What I have found, I believe to be true. Quotes, photo's and so on.
I agree, there is a lot of propaganda. It makes it difficult to sift through. Regardless of what may be true, or not - they shouldn't have done it at all. They had no right. I am consoled somewhat that animal rights groups around the world objected to the Russians actions during that time.

It is true that Laika was sent to her death, but it wasn't out of human curiosity - rather, space flight and the associated leaps in technology that came from it were "a giant leap for mankind" and that is the reason why Laika's death was necessary, and is honored to this day
To me, that falls within the purview of human curiousity. We didn't know if humans could survive launch, or space - so, naturally in our hubris, we sent "lesser" beings in our stead to see what would happen. This then, yes, spured us on to greater heights; but, in my view, Laika should never have been sent. I know it'll sound cold, or misanthropic, but if you want to find something out; do it yourself. Want to see what space does to humans? Send up a human volunteer. That dogs life was just as important as any humans (another minority opinion, lol) and she was treated as a tool that could be thrown away (not by the scientists, but by others who ordered the scientists).

And despite that, we're still doing it today. We inject animals with HIV to test our anti-HIV treatments on them. Sorry, but if you want to do that.. inject it into a human.

Animal's aren't our tools, they don't belong to us. Despite what human arrogance makes us think.

We do NOT advocate nor honor animal cruelty in any form. However, we can't change the past, only advocate for better treatment of animals in the future. In that sense, we think naming a pet/animal pack after Laika is fitting.
I'm glad to hear that, and I understand your reasoning, even if I don't agree with it. :)
By using Laika as the pack name, to me at least, it sent the wrong message. Instead of advocating for better treatment, the message I got was one more of .. dismissal. Like "yes, Laika died and that sucks.. but look at all the cool space stuff that came out of it." The message I interpreted was that what happened to Laika was okay because something good came from it. I feel it needs to be said though, I know that wasn't your intent.

In a way, it brings awareness to Laika and can be a tool in promoting better treatment of animals
I hope it can be.

I hope that our reasoning is understandable to you, and even if we disagree that you feel respected in your opinion. We really do appreciate you sharing them!
It is, and I do and I appreciate that.

I will continue to support Surviving Mars, despite this. I know you guys had no ill-intent behind it, and neither did the people suggesting it.

I would just like to point out the reasoning for my rather angry outburst. I do feel strongly about the mistreatment of animals; yesterday just really wasn't a good day for me to be reading about an animal pack named after a dog that was sent into space and died terrified, alone and in pain.

Work with animals is a source of suffering to all of us. We treat them like babies who cannot speak. The more time passes, the more I’m sorry about it. We shouldn’t have done it. We did not learn enough from the mission to justify the death of the dog.
- Oleg Gazenko (one of the scientists who trained Laika), 1998
 
Sure, a human going up and sacrificing himself (this was back in the sixties) would be noble, but I'd 100% and happily send 100 fidos to their deaths instead of one human.
Yeah well..

“Humility is the greatest quality that a man can have, and arrogance is undoubtedly the worst.” - Maulana W. Khan
 
Yeah well..

“Humility is the greatest quality that a man can have, and arrogance is undoubtedly the worst.” - Maulana W. Khan

And what does arrogance have to do with valuing human life most of all?
 
I assumed "the arrogance of valuing humans over all other creatures"?

Thats hardly arrogance by any reasonable definition of the word.

If I had to choose between saving the lives a billion cute puppies and the life of one crotchety old man that personally disliked me and I personally disliked, and who wouldn’t even appreciate me saving him, I’d pick the old man. I hope.
 
Will you be able to flatten the entire map using those bulldozer rovers, or will there be limits to what they can do? I would love to be able to flatten the map, and sculpt it to my heart's content ;)