-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
They should implement a coat style based on geometric patterns and/or calligraphy.
.png){kind=avatar}
10 new prowinces?
You actually managed to find all 10 I added, and counted them correctly?
I am genuinely impressed by that. Good job.
At the risk of being a Cyprus fanboy, it could use another province.
I get that the super rich part of Cyprus' history might have been later in the period. But the just two provinces really doesn't simulate it.
I get that the super rich part of Cyprus' history might have been later in the period. But the just two provinces really doesn't simulate it.
I have a feeling the Caliphate of Cordoba is just a titular title given to the Umayyads to simulate their historical title, and it's not the actual Sunni Caliph title which is held by the Abbassids still.
Damnit! Seeing governors being called "Sultans" still grinds my gears! But everything else looks promising, so that's good!
Shouldn't the Abbasids in 867 and 936 start with high decadence, like the Fatimids do in 1066?
Shouldn't the Abbasids in 867 and 936 start with high decadence, like the Fatimids do in 1066?
Unfortunately, this does guarantee that this patch will not be save-compatible with 3.1.1, no?
Saves I have opened in 3.2 have opened and worked, but ... There's always a certain amount of oddities with map reworks. If anyone is in the process of playing through a large game, I would definitely recommend waiting with an update until they've finished.
It's not the dejure things that empires get, it's that it allows vassal kings.
And the historical back and forth doesnt seem to happen now, let alone with an even more powerful Umayyablob
Ali of Buyids had his heir, Panah Khosrow become a brilliant military leader and he took over Iraq, al jazira, and Daylam. Any chance be could be written in as a child of destiny with those claims?
Lastly, any chance the cultural retinue of the Persians be changed to cataphracts? The Byzantines copied the Sassanians afterall
Lastly, any chance the cultural retinue of the Persians be changed to cataphracts? The Byzantines copied the Sassanians afterall
Disagree. Umayyads in 769 and 867 can get destroyed by a well-used Reconquista early on, while in 935 they should be at the height of their power.
I'm not talking about the player.
And while they should be powerful they shouldn't be taking over most of France and moving into the HRE
@Snow Crystal I have a slight concern when looking at the AAR. In the decision to split Germany into all the separate 'tribes' you see Swabia, Thuringia, Franconia, Bavaria, and Saxony all gain independence. Why not Frisia? If you're going with splitting the kingdom into the separate tribal identities, then surely Frisia would still have their identity, as they were conquered shortly before the Saxons.
Also, what's with the duchies of East and West Frisia, are they dejure, titular, or just cultural names of old duchies?
Also, what's with the duchies of East and West Frisia, are they dejure, titular, or just cultural names of old duchies?
The Kaaba was still in Mecca. The Qarmatians had the Black Stone (which is something contained within the Kaaba). I believe they wanted to redirect/end Hajj, but the Hajj continued unabated to Mecca. Maybe it would make sense for the rest of Islam to have a small Moral Authority malus to signify the stone being held by the Qarmatians?
Now, if there were options to redirect/end Hajj if if the Moral Authority of Sunni/Shia is low and the Qarmatian Moral Authority was high... That could be an interesting idea.