First of all, apologies for the images. If I try and take a screenshot I get a blank image so I've had to take pictures on my phone and upload them.
Having moved on from the tutorial I've had a go with Pontus (the tag that starts as Pontus rather than reforming from Kios, I didn't know about the Mithridatic Kingdom until I consulted the Wiki). Whilst things are going ok - I've been able to carve out my own kingdom in northwest Asia Minor (Anatolia image) - there are still a few things I'm not sure about, and which I'm not sure I've understood from the Wiki.
I've had "suboptimal research generation" the entire time (the middle icon of the three in the notifications image), and I've no idea how to get rid of it! I can guess that it's because I've not promoted any pops to citizens or nobles, and having reformed into a Monarchy from a tribe I'm mostly a kingdom of freemen and slaves. I've put a couple of "promotion" edicts on, but generally I've found that most of my territories want to revolt, so I've been trying to negate this with Harsh Treatment where possible.
Similar to a recent post, I had a potential decision to convert to Cybelene at the start of the game, but as most of my rulers were Zoroastrian I've spent the first 50 or so years converting my pops instead - coupled with reforming from a tribe to a monarchy, I've had a lot of revolts (although this is part of what makes the game challenging and enjoyable). The first time I reached 200 PI I was offered the chance to convert to Cybelene, but by then I'd spent so much time converting that the majority of my pops were now Zoroastrian and therefore it seemed like a waste of time to convert my rulers to Cybelene. I've got no gripe with this, it's more of a "lesson for another time", but on the whole, is converting actually worth it? I've carried on converting as it seems like I've started so I might as well continue to do it, but I'm still not sure what I've actually gained from it.
One last question, as you can see from the "bigger picture" image, in 80 years while I've been having a go in Asia Minor, the Romans have conquered a lot (to put it mildly). I'm allied to the Seleucids, so I'm pretty sure I'll be fighting either Rome or Egypt at some point. I've got a few forts dotted around, but can afford a few more. Is it worth having more low-level forts or fewer high-level ones? Whoever I end up fighting I'm going to be outnumbered (and probably by better troops given the lack of research progress) so I guess I have to try and wear them down somehow?
Once again, thanks for the help. I'm really enjoying the game, I just know there are things I'm being hampered by and it'd be nice to know what to do about it!
Having moved on from the tutorial I've had a go with Pontus (the tag that starts as Pontus rather than reforming from Kios, I didn't know about the Mithridatic Kingdom until I consulted the Wiki). Whilst things are going ok - I've been able to carve out my own kingdom in northwest Asia Minor (Anatolia image) - there are still a few things I'm not sure about, and which I'm not sure I've understood from the Wiki.
I've had "suboptimal research generation" the entire time (the middle icon of the three in the notifications image), and I've no idea how to get rid of it! I can guess that it's because I've not promoted any pops to citizens or nobles, and having reformed into a Monarchy from a tribe I'm mostly a kingdom of freemen and slaves. I've put a couple of "promotion" edicts on, but generally I've found that most of my territories want to revolt, so I've been trying to negate this with Harsh Treatment where possible.
Similar to a recent post, I had a potential decision to convert to Cybelene at the start of the game, but as most of my rulers were Zoroastrian I've spent the first 50 or so years converting my pops instead - coupled with reforming from a tribe to a monarchy, I've had a lot of revolts (although this is part of what makes the game challenging and enjoyable). The first time I reached 200 PI I was offered the chance to convert to Cybelene, but by then I'd spent so much time converting that the majority of my pops were now Zoroastrian and therefore it seemed like a waste of time to convert my rulers to Cybelene. I've got no gripe with this, it's more of a "lesson for another time", but on the whole, is converting actually worth it? I've carried on converting as it seems like I've started so I might as well continue to do it, but I'm still not sure what I've actually gained from it.
One last question, as you can see from the "bigger picture" image, in 80 years while I've been having a go in Asia Minor, the Romans have conquered a lot (to put it mildly). I'm allied to the Seleucids, so I'm pretty sure I'll be fighting either Rome or Egypt at some point. I've got a few forts dotted around, but can afford a few more. Is it worth having more low-level forts or fewer high-level ones? Whoever I end up fighting I'm going to be outnumbered (and probably by better troops given the lack of research progress) so I guess I have to try and wear them down somehow?
Once again, thanks for the help. I'm really enjoying the game, I just know there are things I'm being hampered by and it'd be nice to know what to do about it!