• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Very impressive world building so far. Looking forward to seeing how the Vicky 2 part of this story shapes up.

The fact that Assyrians actually make up a minority in the Republic is interesting, certainly explains that string of non Assyrian leaders the Republic had for a while. Hopefully this also means that the Republic can’t really afford to keep extractive and exclusive institutions like ghettoization and slavery for long if it doesn’t want interethnic tensions in the long term.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Let us hope that the religious and cultural diversity does not lead to civil wars and instability...

I found the update helpful, and I wonder if certain parts are foreshadowing...
 
  • 1
Reactions:
Dammit, missed the transition to victoria

Been following the series since the early eu4 days and im excited to see more of this world!

Can we get a world political and cultural map?
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Assyria and Her Possessions in 1817
Assyria and Her Possessions in 1817

1679348680971.png

Beyond metropolitan Assyria in the Middle East, Nineveh also ruled a large colonial empire stretching across the Indian Ocean world including lands in Africa, India and the Indies. While the metropolitan Republic had a population of 15.4 million, a further 7,681,145 lived in the colonies. Of these, around a fifth were Nestorian Christians – making up a quarter of the total Nestorian population under Assyrian rule – while the absolute majority, 4.2 million in all, were Muslim. The entire empire was largely controlled by a small minority of a little under 600,000 settler creoles of Middle Eastern origin who lorded over the various indigenous peoples as masters.

This empire could be divided into four distinctive sections: Al-Opheeria and the East African Littoral, Malabar, Sumatra and the Indies.

There were distinctive forms of government in each of these colonies. Al-Opheeria and Sumatra, both home to powerful creole populations with distinctive political inclinations, had significant self government through elected assembles and wider autonomy on most domestic issues. Malabar had somewhat weaker control over its own affairs while the Indies were ruled directly as colonies by Nineveh.

Al-Opheeria

Ethnicity
%
Number
Al-Opheerian​
19.7​
166,055​
Bantu​
36.9​
311,037​
Swazi​
31.7​
267,205​
Khoisan​
11.4​
96,092​
Mzungu​
0.3​
2,529​
Total​
842,918​

Denomination
%
Number
Nestorian​
38.1​
321,152​
Pagan​
29.7​
250,347​
Sunni​
20.5​
172,798​
Catholic​
3.7​
31,188​
Greek Christian​
2.6​
21,916​
Other Christian​
2​
16,858​
Zikri​
1.2​
10,115​
Protestant​
1​
8,429​
Jewish​
0.9​
7,586​
Shia​
0.3​
2,529​
Total​
842,918​

Al-Opheerian 19.7% (166,055)

The Al-Opheerians were the descendants of the Middle Eastern settlers who had been migrating to Southern Africa since the end of the sixteenth century. Initially predominantly Nestorian with a substantial Muslim component – largely derived from Babylonia and Arabia – a variety of Christian and Jewish minorities had joined this multi-confessional and multi-ethnic creole population over the generations. Although religiously diffuse and with mixed backgrounds, the settlers had formed a cohesive common culture, identity and language based on a mixture of Syriac and Arabic known as Al-Opheerian.

They had been drawn to the country by the promise of land and riches, particularly gold that had been plentiful aroun the South African Cape in the two centuries after their arrival. As they later began to push inland, their true ethnogenesis as a nation occurred during the Swazi War when they fought in absence of serious support from the Assyrian army to defeat the Swazi Confederation that sought to push them from Africa and enslave their enemies. Since then, they had developed into an infamously reactionary bulwark within the Assyrian world – aligning closely with counter-revolutionaries during the Revolutionary Civil War and being the last holdout against the Federal Republic.

Within Al-Opheeria, the creoles were most concentrated around the Cape, where their oldest communities lay. There, they formed around a third of the population, but could be found throughout the colony as a ruling caste.

The Al-Opheerian population was also inclusive of the settlers of the East African Littoral islands of the Seychelles, Comoros, Mauritius and the Mascarene Islands. These islands had been settled at the end of the fifteenth century, a full century before the Cape, and had been uninhabited before the arrival of the Assyrians. All developed similar societies based on plantation agriculture and slavery, with Black slaves making up 30-40% of the population on each island. Unlike the mainland Cape, the settlers of these islands were far more homogeneous. During their initial colonisation, the right to settle had been limited to Nestorians and restrictions on migration from those outwith the religion remained in place for generations, leaving them largely empty of religious minorities.

Bantu 36.9% (311,037)

The Bantus were a large collection of ethnicities and nations living across Southern Africa who spoke related Bantu languages. Their greatest tribes included the Zulu, the Xhosa and the Sotho. These tribes were all distinguished in that they were free from slavery, and largely lived distinct from the areas of Al-Opheerian settlement. They were the clearly majority of the population across the colony outside of the area around the Cape itself, and a minority there.

Religiously, the Bantu tribes were split between those who adopted Christianity, particularly common in the south, the numerous Muslim communities in the north and along the coast who had come under Swahili influence over the centuries and Pagan tribes in the interior who held on to traditional African beliefs.

Their relationship with the settlers was traditionally tense and typified by occasional violence, varying levels of exploitation and friction with both local elites and the Assyrian state.

Swazi 31.7% (267,205)

The designation 'Swazi' originated in the aftermath of the Swazi War of the late seventeenth century when the AL-Opheerian creoles crushed the Swazi Confederation and enslaved their entire nation. Such were the numbers of the enslaved, that 'Swazi' came to be used as a byword for any black slave throughout Southern Africa. The nineteenth century Swazis included people drawn from dozens of different peoples across Africa, who had all been brought to the colony to live as the slaves of the creoles. Al-Opheeria possessed one of the largest slave populations of any part of the Assyrian empire, with the enslaved forming close to a majority in some parts of the country, especially in the south around the Cape were settler control was at its greatest. Indeed, while Al-Opheeria had a smaller population than Philistia, it contained a third of all the slaves in the Assyrian Empire. They formed the central component of the Al-Opheerian economy – working in the mines, fields, in workshops and as domestic servants.

Khoisan 11.4% (96,092)

The Khoisan were the indigenous people of the South African Cape, who had lived in the region prior to the migration of Bantu-speaking people into the area. They held a distinctive position within the racial hierarchy of Al-Opheeria. Lighter skinned than the Bantu, generally more placid and less warlike and less technologically advanced, the Khoisan maintained happier relations with the creoles than their fellow native Africans. Indeed, as the historic population around the Cape, many Khoisan tribes had negotiated treaties and privileges with the Middle Eastern settlers in the first decades after their arrival in Africa, rights that remained largely respected so long as they did not interfere with creole demands for access to the most valuable land and resources.

Mzungu 0.3% (2,529)

Mzungu was derived from a Swahili term for foreigner. In Al-Opheeria it was used to refer to communities of white Europeans, mostly Scots, Italians and Greeks, who had settled in the eponymous city of Al-Opheeria on the Cape. There they formed an influential and distinct community of trades, often looked upon suspiciously for their wealth and as a source of foreign influence.

Malabar

Culture
%
Number
Nasrani​
56.7​
757,581​
Hindu​
25.3​
338,038​
Moors​
17.6​
235,157​
Assyrians​
0.4​
5,344​
Total​
1,336,120​

Nasrani 56.7% (757,581)

The Nasrani, as the knew themselves, or the St Thomas Christians were the faced Nestorian Christians of India. With ancient roots reaching back Thomas the Apostle's travels to India, and connections to the Church of the East from the earliest years of its existence they had spent many centuries as a distant and exotic connection to the Syriac world. From the Middle Ages, they emerged as the subject of intense spiritual important among Nestorians – who saw in them a link to the Apostles and a defiantly Christian community on the edge of Pagan barbarism. This fascination was truly born under the legendary King Nahir the Bear who led the First Malabar Crusade at the beginning of the thirteenth century, establishing the Malabar Raj that would last until the end of the century before being reconquered by native Hindu Tamil powers. The area was later subjected to the unsuccessful Second Malabar Crusade in the sixteenth and the victorious Third Malabar Crusade in the Seventeenth century – which led to the territory's present borders.

The centuries of Assyrian involved in the region had allowed the Nasrani community to grow significantly since the High Middle Ages. While only a majority within the borders of Assyrian Malabar, there were significant numbers of Christians in northern Malabar – which remained under Tamil rule – and smaller communities scattered around India, especially in the south.

Unlike other parts of the colonial empire, the ruling class of Malabar was largely made up of native Nasrani – who were respected as an equals by pious Nestorians in particular. As a community, the Nasrani had historically been somewhat detached from the internal struggles of Assyrian political life, even as they enthusiastically supported their presence in India as the guarantor of their power and security. Religiously, they were noted for their conservatism within the Church of the East and had been staunch supporters of the Old Nestorian Patriarchate during its exile following the eighteenth century schism.

Hindus 25.3% (338,038)

The ancient faith of India that remained dominant across the subcontinent in the early nineteenth century. Although speaking a shared Tamil language, the Hindus saw their community as highly distinct from the Christians and Muslims of Malabar – being more truly Indian and Tamil. For centuries they had engaged in ethnic rivalries with the Christians, persecuting them with great regularity during the Medieval and Early Modern period prior to the Assyrian re-conquest of Malabar. After the restoration of Christian Malabar, the tables were turned and the Hindus came under significant suspicion for their real and imagined sympathies and connections to the Tamil empires beyond Assyria's borders. In 1817 they were an unhappy and restive people who dreemed of driving the Assyrians out and restoring Hindu rule to Malabar.

Moors 17.6% (235,157)

Islam had been present in southern India since the seventh century, brought to the region by Arab traders. Like the Hindus and Nasrani, the Malabar Moors were of largely indigenous Indian ethnic stock, speaking the same Tamil language as their neighbours. However there mix did include an Arab element that had merged into the wider Indian population over time. Within Malabar, the Moors had faced historic hostility from both Hindu and Christian regimes over the centuries, often caught between them in their struggles for power – at times aligning with the Hindus against the Christians and at others joining with the Nasrani against external Hindu Tamil empires.

Assyrians 0.4% (5,344)

A small population of ethnic Assyrians lived in Malabar. Many belonged to religious communities, with dozens of monastic communities and shrines doting the area while others served as economic and administrative elites seeking to secure wealth and the power of the Assyrian empire in its Indian foothold.

Sumatra
Ethnicity
%
Number
Alsharqian​
12.2​
373,115​
Malay​
61.3​
1,874,750​
Pribumi​
22.1​
675,889​
Asians​
2.5​
76,458​
Black​
1.9​
58,108​
Total​
3,058,320​

Denomination
%
Number
Sunni​
65.9​
2,015,433​
Hindu​
19.8​
605,547​
Nestorian​
9.9​
302,774​
Buddhist​
2.2​
67,283​
Other Christian​
1​
30,582​
Other Muslim​
0.9​
27,601​
Jewish​
0.3​
9,100​
Total​
3,058,320​

Alsharqian 12.2% (373,115)

Like the Al-Opheerians, the Alsharqians were a creole population consisting largely of a blend of Semitic settlers from the Middle East – Christian, Muslim and Jews. This community was as much as a century older, having emerged from the elites of the Malaccan Trading Company who had first established forts, plantations and mines on the island. Over time, more and more Middle Easterners made the island of Sumatra their permanent home, building a self confident and highly developed society.

The Alsharqians had a number of key differences with the Al-Opheerians. They were notably wealthier, with the immense riches of Sumatra and the Indies outweighing those of South Africa. They were also generally more urbanised, had never developed a similarly intensive slave holding tradition, had much healthier relations with the indigenous population and were a somewhat less pious society. The Sumatran creoles were also far more liberal. Indeed, the failed Sumatran Revolution in the late seventeenth century acting as something of a precursor to the later Assyrian Revolution, while in that great conflagration Sumatra firmly supported the Republicans, even freeing its own slaves.

Within the colony, the Alsharqians were most numerous in northern and western Sumatra, being much weaker in the south and east of the island and on the Assyrian enclave of peninsular Malaya.

Malay 61.3% (1,874,750)

The Malays were the majority population of Sumatra and Malaya and exerted significant cultural sway across Maritime South East Asia. Indeed, the Malay language operated as a lingua franca throughout the region, while ethnic Malay communities peppered the islands to the east, in particular Borneo. Having adopted Islam during the Middle Ages, the Malays spread their faith eastward to the islands of Borneo, Sulawesi and the Tagalog Peninsula, outcompeting the traditional dominance of Indic Hindu religion in the region, even as Hinduism retained its grip over the populous island of Java as well as the southern quarter of Sumatra itself.

Within Sumatra, the Malays were largely a peasant class with creoles and Asians serving the colony's upper and middle strata. Nonetheless, the Malays were regarded as more civilised than most of the other peoples of the region by the Assyrian elite and were more closely integrated into modern society.

Pribumi 22.1% (675,889)

The 'first to the soil', the Pribumi was a collective term for the constellation of indigenous peoples of the Indies regarded as less civilised by the Assyrian ruling class. On Sumatra these varied from tribal communities living primitive lives deep in the jungle and mountain of the interior to peasant communities from minority groups. With such a broad range of groups, there was no single experience among the Pribumi but they generally had a looser relationship with the state and the creole caste than the Malays, tending to live in less accessible and isolated parts of the colony. Religiously, they were disproportionately Hindu – having resisted the waves of proselytising that had swept the East Indies in the preceding centuries. However their numbers also included many Muslims and smaller groups of Christians.

Asians 2.5% (76,458)

The Middle Easterners were not the only settler community in the colony, but were joined by a number of Asian communities – principally Buddhist Koreans, but also Hindu Bengalis and Chinese. These groups had arrived during the rule of rival colonial powers, forced out of Sumatra by Assyrian arms but remained in place – acting as the upper caste in parts of eastern Sumatra and Assyrian Malaya.

Blacks 1.9% (58,108)

The Sumatran Blacks were among the first significant slave population to be freed in Assyria. With the plentiful nature of low cost indigenous labour, African slavery had played only a minor part in the history of Sumatra and the Indies. Unlike their fellows in metropolitan Assyria, the Sumatran Blacks had avoided the fate of ghettoisation but instead lived similar difficult lives tied to labour in mines and plantation by all-controlling employer masters.

The Indies

Ethnicity
%
Number
Pribumi​
93​
2,272,722​
Malay​
4.6​
112,414​
Alsharqian​
1.5​
36,657​
Asians​
0.5​
12,219​
Blacks​
0.4​
9,775​
Total​
2,443,787​

Denomination
%
Number
Sunni​
71.6​
1,749,751​
Pagan​
19.4​
474,095​
Nestorian​
7.7​
188,172​
Other​
0.8​
19,550​
Buddhist​
0.5​
12,219​
Total​
2,443,787​

Pribumi 93% (2,272,722)

The rest of the Indies had never been subjected to the same level of settlement as Sumatra – with efforts at doing so attracting scant success. Equally, there was no single dominant or even leader ethnic group like the Malays among a scattering of islands that was home to dozens of smaller indigenous ethnicities. All broadly of a shared Austronesian culture and heritage, these communities varied across island and region, including hunter gathers in the jungle interiors and peasant masses cultivated advance export-orientated spice economies. Religiously, Islam was the dominant force across the Indies, but there were sizeable numbers of Pagan believers in traditional religions.

Malays 4.6% (112,414)

Beyond their homeland in Sumatra and Malaya, there were Malay communities scattered across the Indies – particularly on the island of Brunei where they occupied many coastal regions. Throughout the region they tended to have stronger relations with the Assyrian state than other native populations – with the creoles often being more familiar with Malay speech and regarding them as being more civilised and therefore more willing to employ them commercial and administrative roles. As such they were a cornerstone of Assyrian rule in the Indies.

Alsharqian 1.5% (36,657)

There had been very little creole settlement in the Indies, and what there had been was focussed on the island of Sulawesi, which had spent the longest period under Assyrian rule and was the centre of the regional spice trade. The island had been the base of the Moluccan Company, the less successful rival to the Malaccan Company of Sumatra and had been the subject of largely unsuccessful attempts to stimulate a settler colony on the Sumatran model. Its creoles were culturally heavily influenced by the larger population to the west and shared.

Asians 0.5% (12,219)

As was the case in Sumatra, there were small communities of Asians operating largely as commercial and property owning classes throughout the Indies. These included groups of Chinese, Japanese and some Koreans.

Blacks 0.4% (9,775)

The Blacks played an even lesser role in the life of the Indies than they did on Sumatra. There was only a very small population living mostly on the island of Sulawesi close to the Alsharqian settler communities who had brought their ancestors to the region. Like their fellows in Sumatra, they were freed from slavery during the Revolution although had enjoyed little advanced in social status since.
 
Last edited:
  • 3Like
  • 3Love
Reactions:
And that's us finished our very in depth look at Assyria and her Empire at the dawn of the Victorian Age! One further transition update to look at the rest of the world and then the story begins.

In terms of the above data. The creoles are just Assyrian culture in game (which helps me with my POPs!). All the 3 religious groups in Malabar are Tamils with different religions. Bantu includes a variety of different ethnicities, which I grouped together - only leaving out the in game Khoisan. And the Pribumi are a variety of in game ethnicities grouped for the sake of this rundown.

Wow, that was detailed! Bravo!
Need it or not, I read it and enjoyed it. :p

I am glad you enjoyed it! I knew it would be long but maybe not quite that length :p.

I concur- whether or not it was wholly necessary, it was very interesting and will provide some quite important context to the struggles the 19th century no doubt has in store for us

Yes, while I do give little glimpses into the different communities during the main story updates (and had to go back through the AAR to spot what I'd previously said to avoid contradicting myself :p) there are many we have heard from rarely if at all and having the numbers quantifies will help make sense of this Assyrian world.

How that is managed will be interesting and crucial to Assyria’s survival and prosperity. It surely has the potential to burst asunder at at any time.

This is a notably more diverse country, with weaker dominant component than Poland was in my last AAR - and they certainly had a tough time in this era as readers of both stories will remember!

That was monumental, even magisterial.

High praise! I am glad you enjoyed reading :).

Very impressive world building so far. Looking forward to seeing how the Vicky 2 part of this story shapes up.

The fact that Assyrians actually make up a minority in the Republic is interesting, certainly explains that string of non Assyrian leaders the Republic had for a while. Hopefully this also means that the Republic can’t really afford to keep extractive and exclusive institutions like ghettoization and slavery for long if it doesn’t want interethnic tensions in the long term.

Thanks!

The Assyrian component of the Republic is not just a minority but a fairly small one. Even if we take on board the other accepted cultures (Armenians, Mashriqi Arabs and Jews), we are still talking a narrow minority of the population. It will be no easy thing welding the peoples of this state together.

Let us hope that the religious and cultural diversity does not lead to civil wars and instability...

I found the update helpful, and I wonder if certain parts are foreshadowing...

We must pray that Assyria's leaders in this new century find a way to build a Republic all can share together as we approach modernity - otherwise things could get ugly :eek:.

Dammit, missed the transition to victoria

Been following the series since the early eu4 days and im excited to see more of this world!

Can we get a world political and cultural map?

Welcome along, always good to see a new commenter starting up :). I don't have a world culture map (and given the game files are lost now, won't be able to get one). But the next update will have a world map and a rundown of the key players internationally.

Glad you are back! I remeber your Norse Egypt AAR:)

Welcome aboard! That might be my most fondly remember AAR. A full decade later and it's always the one people mention to me as having enjoyed the most :). Something about long boats and Pyramids! :D
 
  • 3Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Assyria seems rife for ethnic strife and religious upheaval if mismanaged, but can also be an excellent guiding light of tolerance and multi ethnic and multi faith democracy, which would surely boost it's scientific and industrial output, closing the gap with Europe.

But that would require the abolition of slavery, end to ghettoisation and for the Nestorian Church to abandon it's remaining influence in the government. Let's see if the new powers that be are willing to make these changes...
 
  • 3
Reactions:
I'm worried about India... what empires does Malabar border?

Also, has anyone else colonized the East Indies? What's up with Australia, for that matter?
 
  • 2
  • 1Like
Reactions:
A reminder of how truly grim things are in (especially) Al-Opheeria. The future cannot come soon enough, as far as dismantling those institutions goes
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Wonderful break-down. A delightful mixture of gameplay and real-world history. Necessary maybe not. Wonderful read definitely. Thank you for the hours spent developing this wonderful alt-world that you are sharing with us.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
Given how big of a role slavery plays in the economies of both metropolitan Assyria and its colonies, it might take a long time before slavery can be abolished in the republic, assuming it is abolished peacefully and there isn't a civil war over the issue of slavery in either the mainland or in the colonies. I could definitely see colonies like Al-Opheeria seceding if the mainland tries to abolish slavery anytime soon.
 
Last edited:
  • 3
Reactions:
The World in 1817
The World in 1817

1679512189139.png

Western Europe

The great narrative of the Early Modern period was the gradual ascent of the West. For much of history, the Eastern Mediterranean and Asia had been the heart of the world economy, civilisation, culture and wealth. Between the fifteenth and seventeenth centuries, there was a rebalancing of this patter as Europe enjoyed the fruits of cultural renewal that was sparked by the importation of elements of the Assyrian Renaissance and eventually saw Western Europe grow into a global centre of intellectual life and the birthplace of the Enlightenment. Europe also spread its influence West, to conquer the new world, and south into Africa. In the eighteenth century the continent would reach new heights with the advent of the industrial revolution that, by the early nineteenth century would see the West overtake the East as the motor of the world economy.

At the heart of Western Europe were a series of powerful nation states, notably different to the sprawling, diverse, multi ethnic, empires common in the East. The largest and richest was the Thuringian Republic of Germany – the last bastion of the Revolutionary wave unleashed by Assyria in the mid-eighteenth century. It was the largest western European state with no overseas empire of its own, but nonetheless was home to a large and highly educated population, a flourishing economy – the first in the world to begin the process of industrialisation, and the continent's most democratic state with a broader franchise even that Assyria.

The next truly great power was Scotland, who controlled the majority of the British Isles, a small enclave across the Channel and the largest oversees colonial empire the world had ever seen. Second only to Germany as a centre of industry, benefiting like their Republican counterpart from an educated populace and massive reserves of easily accessible coal, and the dominant maritime power in the Atlantic world with increasing influence in the Indian and Pacific Oceans as well. Scotland was a constitutional monarchy with an elected parliament but was very hostile to republicanism and revolution, and was noted for the presence of an influential abolitionist movement that had already banned the Transatlantic slave trade.

Western Europe's third key player was Italy. A constitutional monarchy with a growing industrial base of its own, focussed around its rich northern cities, Italy had significant interests throughout the Mediterranean. To the west, France held firm to old fashioned absolutism and, while experiencing some industrial development, lagged somewhat behind the Germans, Scots and Italians.

In south west Europe, there were two states relatively minor states with international reach. The first of these was the Kingdom of Aquitaine, which controlled a narrow stretch of territory from Bordeaux to Marseilles that divided the French from the Mediterranean, alongside parts of Iberia. The second was Navarre, the predominant indigenous Spanish Kingdom, concentrated on the Atlantic seaboard of Iberia. Both realms retained traditional feudal monarchies.

Finally, in the north, Scandinavia was divided between a powerful Swedish and modestly sized Danish Kingdoms, the former stretching across the sea to the Baltic and Finland. Both had seen the beginnings of industrial development spill over from Germany and allowed for the modest development of parliamentary systems.

Eastern Europe

Eastern Europe had not experienced the same ascent as the West. These lands remained largely backward and fallen behind the West in recent centuries.

The Byzantine Empire had been heavily diminished over the past century. Through its thousands of years of history, the different incarnations of the Roman state had gone through countless moments of existential peril – from the Fall of the Western Empire to the Islamic Conquest and the Paulician Orthodox Schism – but always survived. During the Early Modern it had experiences a golden period, experting power across Anatolia, the Balkans and Italy and spreading influence oversees. However from the turn of the seventeenth to the eighteenth centuries war and revolution had seen a punishing territorial contraction – much of Italy, including Rome, was lost, the lands beyond the Danube fell, Albania and Bacau had emerged as pro-Assyrian independent Republics, it had been forced entirely from the Caucuses and Armenia. The Empire had also gone through terrible political instability. In 1751, after a long and fateful involvement in the Assyrian Revolutionary Wars, Republican revolutionaries overthrew the Empire and established the Second Roman Republic. A generation later, this state was swept away in the imperial restoration of 1779. The revived Byzantium was not merely absolutist but reactionary in ever sense – enacting draconian censorship and authoritarian rule to stamp out any hint of foreign, revolutionary or liberal ideas. The society that had developed was highly inward looking and suspicious of the outside world.

The other behemoth of Eastern Europe was Chernigov. The Russian state ruled all the lands from the Ukrainian Steppe, a wild land of mixed Slavic, Turkic and Mongolic peoples, through the Russian heartland to the Arctic. An archaic realm in many ways, it was neither Christian nor Muslim but Pagan in its religion of state. By 1817 its rapidly rising population made it among the most populous countries in Europe, with a patchwork of ethnicities and religions within its borders.

To the west, the great power of the Danubian region was Croatia. Having had a Republican regime imposed upon it by the Germans during the Revolutionary years of the mid-eighteenth century. Croatia, itself a multi-ethnic state stretched across dozens of people groups, had been highly unstable, prone to persistent rebellion and conflict over its institutions. At the turn of the century, like Byzantium, its Republican regime had failed, with an austere monarchy capable of keeping its constituent parts in check installed. Poland was the last major state of the wider region, nestled to between the Germans, Swedes, Russians and Croats. Despite its fearsome neighbours, Poland had emerged as a stable constitutional monarchy with the freest people of Eastern Europe and close fraternal ties to Germany.

The Middle East & India

To the south of the Assyrian Federal Republic, the Arabian peninsula was home to a collection of relatively small Muslim theocracies. In the Hedjaz, the Emire of Jeddah controlled the holy city of Mecca, to the east, the Sulaymans Sunni Caliphs clung to a largely empty stretched desert while in the Yemen the Shia Fatimid Caliphs held their own corner of Arabia. Throughout the area, traditional clerical elites held sway.

Ever since the rise of Timur in the fourteenth century, the Timurids had been one of the great powers of the world. Indeed, at their peak in the seventeenth century they were undoubtedly the single most powerful state on earth – controlling not only an endless empire in their own right but also dominating Assyria, Russia, Arabia and much of the Indies. However, they had never recovered from their defeat in the Great Persian War in the mid-eighteenth century, which had seen their international reach retreat, infected the empire with chronic political instability, devastated much of the imperial core in Persia and cost the military the pride of its leadership. Technological change and poor governance in the half century since had only seen the Timurids sink further. By the early nineteenth century the empire had started to come under Scottish influence, with Edinburgh offering aid in modernising the creaking state.

To the north of the Timurids lay the Mongol Khanate. This was a polity formed around the turn of the century by Mongol tribal leaders in the Urals and Caspian Steppe who had rebelled against Persian influence to establish their own state – a throwback to the age when horselords ruled the Eurasian Steppe.

India was split fairly evenly between three large empires, each with tens of millions of inhabitants. In the east the Bengalis, in the south the Tamils and in the west the Rajputs led culturally distinct empires united by a shared Hindu civilisation and their hostility to the influence of Muslim Persia and Christian Assyria on the subcontinent.

The Far East and South East Asia

Beyond the barrier of a collection of small Burmese states lay the powerful law the powerful empires of the far east. The largest of these was the largest and most populous nation on earth – Ming Dynasty China. From the Tarim Basin in the west to the wilds of Siberia in the north, and its holdings in North America, China ruled far beyond the ethnic Han heartland. Nonetheless, China had grown ever more isolationist over the past two centuries, and largely shunned commerce with outsiders aside from a few trusted Asian neighbours – particularly Korea. Across the East China Sea, the Japanese Shogunate mirrored Chinese isolationism and took it even further, with even less interest in external trade or geopolitics.

The great outlier in the Far East was Korea – a power highly engaged in international trade and politics, with a sprawling colonial empire of its own in Malaya, Taiwan, Amur, Sakhalin and on the richest lands on the west coast of North America, home to a Korean settler society of hundreds of thousands. Historically, the Korean empire had been even larger, with its territories in Sumatra having only been recently lost to Assyria. Korean traders acted a bridge between the outside world and the vast close economies of China and Japan.

To the south, mainland South East Asia was controlled by the Thais – who had had strong relations with Assyria for several generations, at times cooperating with them in war. Meanwhile, the East Indies or Maritime South East Asia had been the focus of several centuries of Asiatic colonialism. Powers from both the Middle East and Far East had preyed on the region, with the Assyrians taking the lion's share. However, there were a spate of other players in the region. The Timurids had lands on western Borneo and New Guinea and claimed huge stretches of North Western Australia, although their actual control didn't extend beyond a few small coastal forts. The Arab Sulaymans held the south east of New Guinea and the Solomon islands while the Thais and Rajputs also had territories on the island. Brunei on the northern portion of Borneo stood out as one of the few independent states in the region. The region as a whole was predominantly Muslim, with the major exception being the island of Java with remained strongly Hindu and was divided between two powerful Kingdoms.

Africa

Africa, the poorest of all continents was split between east and west. The west was largely within the orbit of the Europeans. From North Africa under the Italians, who had taken over the remnants of the Crusader Kingdom of Egypt after its relocation to Tunis, the Aquitainians and Navarrese in the western Maghreb, the French in Guinea, Byzantines in Ghana and Navarre around the Niger Delta. A spate of European empires held de jure claims deep into the African interior, while their actual control beyond the coasts was far more fleeting and incomplete.

The most penetrating European power was Scotland – who's lands around the Congo Basin offered an entry point for power that stretched right into the Dark Heart of the continent. Part of the reason for such deep conquest had been missionary-led efforts by anti-slavery Scots to root out the slave trade by establishing control over one of Africa's key slaver hunting grounds. The Congolese interior was a paradise for slavers, with incessant tribal warfare, large populations and pagan people whom the Muslim Swahili in particular saw as justifiable victims for their trade. With the growing influence of the Scots in the region, this trade was facing an unprecedented threat.

While West Africa was in Europe's orbit, and had been for some centuries, the East had traditionally been under Middle Eastern influence. From Assyrian Egypt in the north, Ethiopia and Nubia were the heartlands of the Fatimid Caliphate, Somalia and the Swahili Coast were solidly Sunni while the southern Cape was under Assyrian rule. Throughout the area, Middle Eastern powers had vied for influence, territory and economic control for hundreds of years. However, by the early nineteenth century the Europeans, and Scotland in particular, were beginning to stretch their tentacles into the region.

The Americas

The discovery and colonisation of the Americas had brought wealth and glory to Europe, expanded the World and turned Scotland from a backwater to a global power.

The Scots were unquestioned masters of this New World. In the North, they had built an advanced settler society, as developed as the homeland, in New Scotland on the eastern seaboard of North America. They controlled the entirety of the Caribbean, whose plantations had been the source of incredible riches. Attached to these Caribbean territories administratively were large holdings in the north of South America and Central America, Darien. To the west, much of Mexico and territories west of the Mississippi were also under Scottish colonial rule. These were surrounded by a patchwork of indigenous states, particularly in Mexico where the Aztec Empire had never been fully extinguished despite being forced from its core territory at Tenochtitlan. Finally, in the south there was Brazil, a rich land of fertile soil and great resources.

All these colonies possessed large slave populations which the local elites held on to fiercely, despite the abolition of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade and growing abolitionist sentiment in the British Isles.

A number of other European powers had more modest holdings in the Americas. Aquitaine, although a minor force in Europe controlled the icy lands around the Hudson Bay in the far north and a more valuable band around from coast to coast in South America – stretching from the Pacific, through the Andies to the rich lands around the Riviere D'Argent, Argentina, filled with Francophone colonists. Immediately to the south lay Navarrese Patagonia, a comparatively barren and lightly populated territory of desert and mountain. At the other end of the continent, lay Swedish Vinland, one of the oldest settler societies in the Americas with the first permanent Nordic towns along the Saint Lawrence dating to the first decades of European colonialism in the New World. The last of the European colonial powers of the Americas was the odd one out, the Byzantines. Poorer, more backward and far more distant from the Americas than the other European colonisers, the Byzantines had made use of their Early Modern era heft to secure holdings on the Mississippi in North America and in Guyana and Peru in South America.

The Europeans were not the only ones in the Americas, Oriental powers claimed around half of North America and had established prosperous colonies along its western shoreline. The Chinese held lands in the north, concentrated around the Nootka Sound. Korean interests much larger and richer in California with a population close to a million, large and developed society, second only to the Scottish colonies in the Americas.
 
  • 4Like
  • 4Love
Reactions:
Assyria seems rife for ethnic strife and religious upheaval if mismanaged, but can also be an excellent guiding light of tolerance and multi ethnic and multi faith democracy, which would surely boost it's scientific and industrial output, closing the gap with Europe.

But that would require the abolition of slavery, end to ghettoisation and for the Nestorian Church to abandon it's remaining influence in the government. Let's see if the new powers that be are willing to make these changes...

Its an incredible diverse and divided society both in metropolitan Assyria and in the colonies. It will be a huge challenge to modernise this society, retain its Republican institutions and hold back the centrifugal forces that are bound to pull it apart.

I'm worried about India... what empires does Malabar border?

Also, has anyone else colonized the East Indies? What's up with Australia, for that matter?

Malabar does look a little vulnerable, completely surrounded on all sides by the Tamils.

Australia is split between the Timruids and uncolonised land (free real estate for whoever can get there!). Fortunately for would be colonisers, the Timurid area is basically made up of worthless territory with the really valuable parts of Australia unoccupied. And in the East Indies, just about everyone in Asia has had a bite at some point. By this stage the number of players is more limited, with Assyria having muscled into a strong position.

A reminder of how truly grim things are in (especially) Al-Opheeria. The future cannot come soon enough, as far as dismantling those institutions goes

Yes, Al-Opheeria is the worst of slave-based secular colonialism stretched across a large area of great strategic importance to the world. The creoles there have a strong hand even if the metropolitan Republic were to turn against them.

Wonderful break-down. A delightful mixture of gameplay and real-world history. Necessary maybe not. Wonderful read definitely. Thank you for the hours spent developing this wonderful alt-world that you are sharing with us.

I'm glad you enjoyed reading both sections! The domestic one in particular was a labour of love, but one that went on a long time :p.

Given how big of a role slavery plays in the economies of both metropolitan Assyria and its colonies, it might take a long time before slavery can be abolished in the republic, assuming it is abolished peacefully and there isn't a civil war over the issue of slavery in either the mainland or in the colonies. I could definitely see colonies like Al-Opheeria seceding if the mainland tries to abolish slavery anytime soon.

Al-Opheeria in particular is much further away from abolition that the mainland, with slavery being such a huge part of its society and economy. While only a few parts of metropolitan Assyria have slavery playing an economically significant role.

Was Assyrian slavery purely African or were there slaves from other areas?

Assyrian slavery was purely Africa, we never developed a strong Cricassian, Slavic or Mediterranean trade in the manner the OTL Ottoman Empire (and obviously, there is no attraction to hunting for 'non-Muslim' slaves to the north and west for Christian Assyria) did and the connection to the Swahili coast always made it an easy path for recruitment.
 
  • 3
Reactions:
I wonder how Scottish Americas will develop, will it splinter or will Scotland avoid her RL counterpart’s mistakes? Perhaps it will eventually federate into dominions?
 
  • 1Like
  • 1
Reactions:
A world both strange and familiar, as megacampaigns will tend to produce. Assyria's colonial possessions are relatively cohesive compared to most of the other colonial powers. No doubt the 19th century will see that particular story evolve, though I hope Al-Opheeria does not become the model for expansion into Africa. Perhaps it is too late to nip that in the bud, but with care, the rest may be somewhat less atrocious.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
It will be interesting to see Assyria catch up with Europe and industialize, there’s a lot of room for expansion in places like Africa. It would also be interesting to see Asian great powers like the Koreans keep up with the Europeans as well. I also hope Scotland’s abolitionist movement is successful, through the presence of slavery in its American colonies might hold it back.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Let's hope that Assyria can catch up with Europe!

It's nice to see the rest of the world. Why is Scotland still called Scotland and not Britain, though?
 
  • 3Like
  • 1
Reactions:
1817-1826 A New Wind Blows
1817-1826 A New Wind Blows

1679773986370.png

Majlis Election Results, 1817

At the preceding elections in 1814, the Ishtarians had come closer to power than they had been since the Revolution. 1817 would see a modest retreat from this high, with the Liberals losing several dozen seats. Both the Moderates and Conservatives benefited. The Conservatives saw their vote strengthen, but were poorly placed to make substantial seat gains. Meanwhile, the governing Moderates achieved sizeable parliamentary gains as a result of the swing to them from the Liberals. After a close result in 1814, a comfortable Moderate majority in the Majlis had been restored.

1679774026037.png

One of Vizier Idan Seta's key policies, since coming to office in 1814 was to attempt to open Assyria up to the world while maintaining its established social order. As such, the Republic would see an influx of foreign goods, ideas, technologies and influence throughout Seta's time in office that would greatly change the country. Among these was the establishment of the German military mission in 1817. Assyria and Germany had maintained tight and friendly relations since the time of the Revolution, and the Germans were only too happy to deploy an attaché of military advisers to Nineveh at the Vizier's request. Over the next several years these advisers would implement a series of significant reforms to the Assyrian army, improving its professionalism, drilling it in the latest tactics and importing the modern arms from their homeland.

1679774044952.png

Another power with growing influence in Assyria was Italy. As a major player in North Africa and the Mediterranean, the Italians had long had interests in Assyria. But by the early nineteenth century their involvement in the Republic was growing rapidly as a result of one commodity – cotton. While Italy lacked a competitive edge over Britain and Germany in heavy industries, with its lack of locally available coal, its industrial growth was largely based around textiles. These factories were hungry for cotton, and in Assyria a rich supply was awaiting exploitation. Cotton had been grown commercially in Egypt from the seventeenth century and earned a reputation for its high quality and affordable price. From the 1810s, Italian industrialists would look to invest to boost this production and securing it for their own interests – making use of the connections between Egypt's Latin aristocracy and Rome. In order to secure these investments, Italy pursued closer relations with Nineveh, leading to the Treaty of Farafra in 1819, which officially delineated the borders in North Africa – extended Assyrian sovereignty over a stretched of desert and recognising the independence of the Libyan tribes to the south east of Tripoli.

1679774063152.png

While the Germans and Italians competed from influence in Assyria by friendly means, Scotland would intrude on Nineveh's world in a far more abrupt and immediate fashion. Between 1817 and 1822 the Scots conquered the entirety of the Swahili Coast. Travelling overland and they were driven by a mixture of missionary powered hostility to the barbarism of the Swahili slave trade, aggressive expansionist impulse and the geo-strategic and economic imperative of spreading Scottish influence onto the East African coast and into the Indian Ocean. They accomplished this feet by cooperating with the tribes of Congo and Great Lakes who feared and hated the Muslims of the coast and their cruel slave raiding expeditions and through the superiority of their own military technologies and tactics.

This conquest, for the first time pushing a European power into the forefront of the Indian Ocean world, would have tremendous consequences, many of which would take years to be fully felt. Immediately, the Scots disestablished the millennia old East African slave trade, banning the export of slaves or forced enslavement of any persons within their territories. East Africa had been one of the most important sources of slaves in the world, and the primary market from where Assyrian importers drew theirs. With increasing restrictions on the Atlantic trade through Scottish pressure, there were very few alternate sources for slaves left. The Muslims of Ethiopia and Somalia, while both being slave holding powers themselves, forbade the enslavement of fellow believers, while Al-Opheeria itself had long been an importer rather than exporter of slaves. Indeed, only Madagascar remained a viable major source for Assyrian markets, although with the Swahili middlemen now removed from the equation, the Assyrians themselves would henceforth take on the burden of launching slave raids onto the island.

The conquest had impacts beyond the question of slavery as well. Indeed, East Africa was a valuable part of the wider Indian Ocean economy that Assyria had long been central to. Yet the area's trade would soon begin to reorientate towards its new colonial master. Indeed, Assyrian ships came under additional scrutiny, with Scottish officials forcing inspections to ensure that they were not attempted to illicitly smuggle slaves from the region's ports.

1679774132417.png

Fifth Vizieral Election Results, 1820

1679774107592.png

Majlis Election Results, 1820

The Vizieral election of 1820 was largely a re-run of 1814, with Idan Seta once again lining up against the same Liberal candidate, Bagour Al-Arbela, who had put up the strongest Ishtarian challenge to date in that year. However, this time Seta secured victory by an even wider margin, achieving a majority of the popular vote and pushing Al-Arbela below a third of the vote. In the Majlis, the Liberals similarly suffered modest parliamentary losses. However, although the Moderates picked up parliamentary gains, the Conservatives emerged from the election in the strongest shape as they pushed they pushed above a fifth of the vote and notably strengthened their parliamentary cohort on the backs of a backlash against foreign interference in Assyrian affairs.

1679774173033.png

For much of its history Assyria and the Middle East more generally had been an economic juggernaut with prosperous domestic agriculture, tremendous commercial wealth from trade and a significant domestic manufacturing base of traditional artisanal workshops. All of this was in flux. With Seta, at the behest of the Germans and Italians, offering few restrictions on foreign trade, Assyria had shifted from being a net exporting nation to a major importer, with a flood of cheap products made by industrial means arriving on the Assyrian market. These goods could out compete locally manufactured equivalents. Having already been in decline earlier in the 1810s, artisanal output slumped dramatically after 1817. Textile production feel to two thirds of its 1817 level between 1817 and 1821, recovering by the middle of the decade to around four fifths of its 1817 rate. Home goods, including furniture and ceramics, would collapse to a nadir of just 40% of its 1817 level in 1825 before recovering to around three quarters of its previous level. The drinks industry would similarly reach deep lows at the beginning of the new decade before recovering to modestly above its 1817 level by mid-decade. These changes had a direct impact of impoverishing thousands of workers in the traditional guilds, leaving many previously relatively secure professions insecure and shrinking.

Not only were producers hit but commercial elites too, with the Scots muscling into the Indian Ocean trade, Assyria's traditional role as the middle man between Asian goods and European markets was being challenged and many merchants struggled to keep up with this more competitive world. The dramatic contraction of the availability of slaves also had impacts of its own, leading to massive declines in levels of importation in the 1820s and shrinking profits for the slave-based agriculturalists. While many areas struggled, there were clear success stories – with some commodities such as Egyptian cotton and Lebanese cedar meeting skyrocketing European demand.

1679774209628.png

As Assyrian society changes, political division and reaction loomed. A backlash that was hostile to foreign influence, defensive of slavery and angrily demanded restrictions on trade to protect domestic production was growing steadily stronger. This feeling found its expression among the Conservatives, for whom these concerns aligned with a wider fear of moral decay, but also among sizeable parts of the Moderate governing class. Indeed, the Moderates were growing increasingly divided along a variety of axes. While the Vizier sought to balance conservative principles on the Assyrian social order with his continued commitment to opening up to the West and modernising, others within his own faction pulled towards protectionism. Equally, alongside the rightist agitation, the question of slavery was once again growing in prominence, in particular since the Scottish conquests in East Africa. Many Moderates were increasingly beginning to question Assyrian commitment to the institution on pragmatic grounds, deeming it disruptive to the economy through its role in antagonising trade with the Scots and at risk of developing into an unprofitable economic anachronism that would hold Assyrian society back.

1679774275219.png

Majlis Election Result, 1823

While these changes were afoot, the 1823 midterms appeared to show almost complete stasis, with near identical results to three years previously, the Ishtarians enduring minor slippage and the Conservatives continuing to consolidate their revival while the Moderates defended their two third Majlis majority. However, there were notable changes under the surface. In Egypt, the Conservatives were beginning to lose ground in a traditional heartland that was benefiting from international trade while gaining ground to the east. Meanwhile, the Moderates were continuing to polarise over the issue of trade, with candidates in different parts of the Republic drifting in different directions.

1679774242173.png

The experience of the Timurids in the first two decades had a number of parallels to Assyria. Under the reign of Khan Jahangir the empire had opened itself to the West in the hopes of arresting its relative decline. This had led to all manner of economic pain and social anxiety among elites and commoners alike. The modernising programme faced its ultimate test in the Multan War of 1819-1821 when the Timurids went to war against the Rajputs of north western India. The Persians faced a heavy military loss that saw a large part of the Punjab, one of the empire's most populous and valuable provinces, surrendered. In the aftermath of the defeat, there was significant unrest in Central Asia aimed against efforts to encourage the settlement of nomadic tribes – a reform suggested to the Great Khan by his Scottish advisers. However, with defeat to the Rajputs, Jahangir's mission was badly discredited and in 1822 his brother Husayn murdered him and seized power for himself. Husayn unleashed the fury of anti-modernist reaction on his empire, expelling the Europeans, ripping up their reforms, even destroying machinery including a small basic railway constructed in Isfahan that had been brought to Persian and turning to the Chinese model of cutting the Timurid Empire out from the global economy – almost completely restricting foreign exports into the empire and allowing only a limited number of foreign merchants to enter designated ports to purchase Persian goods.

1679774410704.png

In this instability, Assyria sensed weakness. In 1824, after skirmishes broke out in the mountains of the Caucuses over grazing rights among Georgian border villages, Assyria chose its moment to strike and declared war on the Timurids. While the previously conflict between these two powers had been an era defining war of epic proportions, the 1824 Persian War was a far more straight forward affair. With their modern European guns and German drilling, the Assyrian army drove through the Timurids with relative ease, further strengthening their position by cooperating with dissatisfied communities within the western border regions. With their armies in disarray, the Timurids could do little to prevent the Assyrians from swarming across the Persian heartland, capturing Isfahan, Tehran and Tabriz. The power of European technology was painfully clear for all the see.

1679774304590.png

Badly beaten, the Timurids surrendered in the February 1826 Treaty of Tehran. The truce saw Assyria annex the remnants of Timuirid Georgia and cede independence to two strategically placed Republics – Alania, on the western shore of the Caspian, and East Kurdistan in the Zagros. On top of these territorial changes, Isfahan made economic concessions – ending the closing of its economy to the outside world and giving special rights for the exploitation of coal and mineral resources in north western Persia to a joint German-Assyrian corporation. This was especially crucial as Assyria itself had vanishingly little access to coal within its own borders, while there were large deposits across the border in Persia.

Not long after the triumphant end to the Persian War, Assyria approached its next set of Vizieral elections. With Seta having served two terms, he was not forced to step aside for a successor – the first Vizier to reach the post-Petuel term limit. While the glow of military victory might have been expected to have boosted a continuity candidate to an easy victory, Assyria entered one of its the most hotly contested elections of its history. The country was afflicted by a series of interlocking issues: abolitionism, free trade and foreign interference. The election would be defined by two key forces – Conservative backlash to all three of these forces and division within the Moderates in their response.

The retiring Vizier granted his endorsement to Berge Nubar, an octogenarian Armenian parliamentarian who offered a compromise position of defending slavery while the modernising approach of his predecessor while introducing some limited tariffs to protect domestic producers. The unity of the Moderates could not be maintained as the charismatic governor of Syria, Nasib Naimy gathered the left wing of the ruling party around a platform of free trade, even deeper involvement with the west and legislation against the slave trade, partly to restore economic links to East Africa and partly for moral reasons. Reacting to this division, Conservatives channelled reactionary backlash and fears that the Moderates would betray them to the Liberals. Equally, the Ishtarians put forward a strong campaign demanding immediate action over slavery and unfettered free trade.

1679774436860.png

Sixth Vizieral Election Results, 1826

1679774448675.png

Majlis Election Results, 1826

The results of the election were remarkable and tantalisingly close. The establishment candidate Berge Nubar was elected on by far the least support of any previous candidate, with barely more than a third of the vote. The three challengers all put in impressive showings, each winning near identical vote shares at just over a fifth of the vote. It was striking that the left-leaning Syrian Moderate Naimy not only dominated voting in his home state but reached a broad electoral, including many who had voted for Ishtarian candidates for the Majlis on the same day. The Conservatives, meanwhile, for the first time since the introduction of directly elected Viziers, saw limited slippage between their parliamentary and Vizieral support – Nubar failing to win the trust of right wing voters in the way in which Petuel and Seta had.

That Majlis election was equally dramatic. Although the two rival Moderate candidates secured well over half the Vizieral vote, they endured a steep decline in the parliamentary contest. Indeed, the Moderates shed over a hundred seats and lost their Majlis majority for the first time since 1802. The Ishtarians made significant gains, while the Conservatives further strengthened their 1820s revival with their highest of the popular vote and Majlis seats in a quarter century. The new Vizier had stumbled through towards his own election, and was now hamstrung by a divided Majlis – needing not only to hold his own divided alliance together but reach out beyond it.

1679774349292.png

Nubar would not have a happy start to his time in office as by the end of the year terrible reports of rebellion and massacres in Al-Opheeria were reaching the metropolitan Republic.
 
  • 8Like
  • 2Love
Reactions:
And we are off, with our first story update of Victoria 2! Its a promising start for Assyria, managing to swipe aside the Timurids for so long a big beast of the neighbourhood with remarkable ease and beginning some modernising reforms - most importantly to our military.


I wonder how Scottish Americas will develop, will it splinter or will Scotland avoid her RL counterpart’s mistakes? Perhaps it will eventually federate into dominions?

This is a question that will play a fairly large role in this section of the AAR - so no spoilers just yet! ;)

A world both strange and familiar, as megacampaigns will tend to produce. Assyria's colonial possessions are relatively cohesive compared to most of the other colonial powers. No doubt the 19th century will see that particular story evolve, though I hope Al-Opheeria does not become the model for expansion into Africa. Perhaps it is too late to nip that in the bud, but with care, the rest may be somewhat less atrocious.

This megacampaign is interesting in that during these I often have to do a fair amount of trimming and clipping of borders to shape things up and avoid ridiculously strong hegemons arising. This campaign has needed very little of that to date, with the world developing being fairly satisfying in its balance and realism - which I have enjoyed seeing.

Our colonies are concentrated in a few main clusters, all around the Indian Ocean. A big coming theme will be how Assyria handles the insertion of European interests into its traditional spheres and whether it can adapt and grow in this new world

As hinted at in this last update, dramatic events are at foot in Al-Opheeria, so we will have some closer attention paid there in the next update.

It will be interesting to see Assyria catch up with Europe and industialize, there’s a lot of room for expansion in places like Africa. It would also be interesting to see Asian great powers like the Koreans keep up with the Europeans as well. I also hope Scotland’s abolitionist movement is successful, through the presence of slavery in its American colonies might hold it back.

The Scots have instantly drastically reduced the room for that African expansion! Which is a shame as at game start I had my eye naturally on East Africa for opportunities. In game, the reason for the early colonisation was simple - these provinces have a relatively high in game life rating, leaving them open to early colonisation. The Scots were adjacent through their Congo territories, while ourselves and the other powers in the neighbourhood were still uncivs.

The Scots have been riding a strange horse of being anti slave trade while continuing to tolerate existing slave societies under their rule in the Americas. That has already had consequences in Assyria, but is surely a contradiction that won't be able to last forever.

Let's hope that Assyria can catch up with Europe!

It's nice to see the rest of the world. Why is Scotland still called Scotland and not Britain, though?

In game, they never formed Great Britain. There is still a small Welsh state clinging to life, so I'm not sure if they EU4 requirements needed them to have destroyed that before they could have formed Britain. Part of me likes a world spanning Scottish Empire with massive American interests as a shoutout to another one of my previous AARs, and of course its always nice to see as a Scot myself :D.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions: