I'm no fan of Yak's shenanigans, though I don't think it's a great move to say day 1 you're aiming to lynch someone you think is a likely villager.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
If we're talking about RP, you don't really have to look further than me literally RP'ing as a secessionist for an RP reason to vote me
I kind of messed up there, so the votes on me are fair. Still, while day 1 RP votes are okay I am not a wolf and I would like to be given the chance to help the village for once
Technically everyone is a likely villager. On day 1 of most games we really don't have a reason to think anyone is a wolf. But we have to lynch someone anyway (that was kind of the only point of my earlier RP post btw, I find it a bit funny when WW games start with no deaths on night 0 because then there is no RP reason to start lynching anyone. I was just trying to poke fun at that). I don't think that saying you want to lynch a less useful villager is controversial
I really would like to know what exactly Yak is claiming Aedan sent him though
I think he's probably a villager as wolf Yak doesn't really do these things.
The problem is that we have new players/people who don't have the externsive experience with him we have, and they tend to fall for his idiocy. Wasn't it last game that it ended up costing two villagers, before Yak himself then was hung? Hence it's basically minimising the damage. When Yak does this thing it usually leads to the death of a villager or two before he's strung up himself, so I'm suggesting we skip the innocent villagers dying step.
Midnight your time.
Vote Wagonlitz
I just don't like newbie votes and since I haven't played any games with Capage yet, for me he is a newbie.
I just don't like newbie votes and since I haven't played any games with Capage yet, for me he is a newbie.
I'm not thrilled with this reasoning. Yes, it's likely we kill a villager day 1 unless we get lucky or someone is dumb, but saying screw it let's kill someone we think is a villager because they aren't helpful is a fairly unhelpful strategy. Particularly because it's an easy strategy to take regardless of faction. If we're just going to kill the same people early regardless of faction each game that accomplishes nothing and hamstrings analysis. The way you deal with these things is explaining it to new players. Yeah, some will go along and they'll have to learn, but just killing certain players because they can be detrimental isn't how we get meaningful information.
Well, no one is around and seems. I guess I'll move my vote though if someone wants to do something else.
Unvote the_hdk
Vote Wagonlitz
Unvote the_hdk
Vote Wagonlitz
Unofficial Vote Count
Yakman-6
Liefwarrior (104)
Sleepyhead (106)
Randy (109)
Alxeu (112)
hdk (98->111->122->138)
Wagonlitz (102->121->139)
Panzer-4
Arkasas (87)
Historydude (96)
Mawofdoom (107)
Yakman (103->120)
Wagonlitz-3
Caillean (152)
Euro (115->154)
Happycats (129->155)
hdk-2
Capage (101)
Panzer (105)
Capage-1
Dedonus (95)
Alxeu-1
Wombat (89)
Caillean
Aedan (97->119)
Happycats
Grimlock (113)
Jackson-1
Ironhide (94)
Sleepyhead-1
Agatha (93)
Wombat-1
Jackson (86)
Not Voted
None
Unvote Alxeu
Vote thehdk
A couple players switched off the_hdk while he was in contention, and not really a fan of the logic behind the yakman/Wagon votes. Not really a fan of killing Panzer early either.
Vote thehdk
A couple players switched off the_hdk while he was in contention, and not really a fan of the logic behind the yakman/Wagon votes. Not really a fan of killing Panzer early either.
