Thinking about it then given we're 12 players remaining and there would be 2 to 4 baddies remaining if one pack, depending on whether they got a curse or not, and if there's 2 packs then we're looking at 4 or 5 remaining baddies whether they hit a curse or not.
As such we're very close to parity and given there seems to not be a JL, then I think it might be worth it to publicly claim scans you know of.
I know of one. IG seerish scanned me and told me I came back as villager.
I used a priestly scan on Jacksonian night 2.
vote Aedan
Aedan has essentially only cast throwaway votes for the entire game, except for Day 2.
Day 1: Switched off of Capage (who a frontrunner early on Day 1) and voted for Caillean (only person to vote for her that day)
Day 2: Voted EURO.
Day 3: Voted Capage (again), only person to vote for them that day.
Day 4: Voted for me
I'm also voting Aedan on vibe, as something has felt off about him this game. After reading some of his posts again, while I don't think he explicitly defended Yakman on Day 1, he does say despite not liking Yakman's "shenanigans," you shouldn't vote for someone you think is a villager.
Then on Day 2, the gist of his argument against EURO is that EURO often gets away with his chaotic play style and tried to argue that EURO was trying to save Yakman.
While these two cases are not quite the same (and I am sure Aedan will say so in a counterargument), something just feels off about it.
I didn't make throwaways day 3 and 4, I made cases on candidates I was suspicious of fairly early in the day, I just didn't get many to follow my cases. Day 3 I might have changed if I was on remotely close to deadline, but I wasn't.
As for the Yakman thing, again, there's a big difference between me saying that Wagonlitz 1.0 was making a weird point to say he was voting for someone who he thought was a villager, and Euro coming out close to deadline to say that he wasn't fine with Yakman getting lynched and trying to start a switch to Wagonlitz. Also again, I wasn't the only one who questioned Wagonlitz's reasoning there, so did Happycats, who we know was the seer.
The entire argument there is totally obfuscated by Yakman being a wolf and people letting that cloud their reading. I didn't defend Yakman, I made no response to anyone else voting him, my vote as you point out was not helping him. I was purely pressing Wagon on the reason for his vote. Frankly if Yakman hadn't been lynched day 1 (and Wagon not hunted the same night), I think a very reasonable case could have been made against Wagonlitz for trying to lynch someone he thought was probably a villager. Certainly if today I voted someone and called them a likely villager I'd be strung up in a complete bandwagon, and deservedly so.
But because Yakman was a wolf, people keep twisting what I said into a defense of a wolf for some reason.
Anyways, I'm still suspicious of you, but you lynched the only person who agreed with me yesterday (who was a villager of course), so I need to find someone else that might actually be lynched today.
Sleepyhead's voting Caillean, and she has a pretty bad voting record, voting a confirmed villager every day except day 3, where she voted Witch Agatha, who is probably a villager for being in the switch to Historydude. I've not really felt like Caillean's contributed much in terms of analysis, mainly lain low and gone with the flow too.
HDK's also got a vote. He's gotten some credit for making the tie day 1 even though he was on the sorc, not Yakman. But on the other hand during day 1 he did at one point break a three way by pushing up Yakman. On the other other hand he didn't stay on Yakman, and votes that don't stick are worth much less than ones that do. He's also felt a little suspicious in his posting,, but I find that very common when I play with him, and after I was wrong on Euro I don't particularly want to go back to that tree quite yet.
Still more suspicious of Dedonus, but couldn't get him lynched yesterday and no one else seems suspicious of him, so Caillean's a decent second choice.
Vote Caillean
