• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Tinto Maps #6 - 14th of June 2024 - Great Britain & Ireland

Hello everyone. @Pavía and the rest of the Content Design team are busy working on the feedback for the previous Tinto Maps, so I'm standing in for this week.

I'm @SaintDaveUK, some of you might have seen me here and there on the forums, but the long story short is that I work on a very secret game whose name I am contractually obligated to redact. That's right, it's ███████ ██████!

This week you get a double-whammy, mostly because it’s really hard to show Britain on its own on a screenshot. Partly to side-step the “British Isles” naming controversy, but mainly because the gameplay of them both is so different, this part of Europa is divided into 2 distinct regions: Great Britain and Ireland.

Climate​

The mild Oceanic climate (Köppen Cfb) dominates the isles. Where it cools towards the inland Pennines and the Scottish Highlands (Köppen Cfc), we represent it with the wintry and dreich Continental climate.

climate.jpg




Topography​

The isles are dominated by green and pleasant flatlands and low rolling hills, the peripheries punctuated by rocky mountains and craggy highlands.

We would like to add some more impassable locations in northern England and the Scottish borders to make manoeuvres a little more interesting and strategic, but would like suggestions from people more familiar with the Pennines.

[Edit: 16 June added the missing map]

topography.JPG


Vegetation​

The great moors, bogs, and fens are represented by Sparse vegetation, meanwhile much of the land is still wooded.

vegetation.jpg




Raw Materials​

The raw goods situation aims to reflect the economic reality of medieval Britain. Shepherding was common on every corner of the islands, a lot of the wool produced was sold to the industrial hub of the Low Countries to be manufactured into cloth, which was in turn sold back to British markets.

The further north-west we go, the less fertile the terrain, and as such the greater reliance on pastoral farming such as livestock over wheat. The western hills and valleys also expose a greater number of mineral delights, including the historic stannary mines of Devon and Cornwall.

raw_materials.jpg




Markets​

As you can see the two starting markets are London and Dublin. Aside from London we could have chosen almost any town, from Aberdeen to Bristol. We chose Dublin as it was the main trade centre in Ireland, and also because it handsomely splits the isles to the East and West of the Pennines, demonstrating the impact that terrain can have on dynamic Market attraction.

They are both shades of red because they are coloured after the market centre’s top overlord country – market control is a viable playstyle and we like to think of it as a form of map painting for countries not focused on traditional conquest routes.

market.jpg




Culture​

We have decided to go with a monolithic English culture. We could have forced the introduction of a second Northumbrian or even third Mercian culture, but typically they were not really considered separate peoples. The English, though diverse in origin and with a variety of dialects, had already begun to coalesce in the face of the Viking invasions hundreds of years before.

Scotland, conversely, is a real porridge of cultures. The Lowland Scots (who speak a dialect of Northumbrian English that later develops into the Scots language) dominate their kingdom from their wealthy burghs, and are gradually encroaching onto the pastoral lands of the Gaelic Highlanders. The Norse-Gaelic clansmen watch from the Western Isles, with some old settlements remaining around Galloway. The far north, ironically called Sutherland, retains some Norse presence.

Wales, conquered for around a century by this point, plays host to English burghers looking to make a few quid, as well as the descendants of Norman adventurer knights in the marcher lordships, but is still majority Welsh-speaking from Anglesey to Cardiff.

The Anglo-Irish (representing the spectrum from Cambro-Norman knights to the so-called ‘Old English’ settlers) live in great numbers in the south-eastern trading towns from Dublin to Cork, as well as in smaller numbers in frontier outposts.

The cosmopolitan towns across the isles are also home to people from elsewhere in Europe, most notably Flemish weavers from the Low Countries, though their numbers are too small to impact the mapmode.

The Norman ███████ dominates as the ██████████████ for both of the kingdoms and their subjects. The conquest of 1066 is no longer fresh, but the continuing bonds between the aristocratic classes of England, Scotland, and France have kept the French language alive and strong.

culture.jpg






Religion​

I decided that it's not even worth taking a screenshot of the Religion map mode. There are tiny minorities of Jewish people in some Scottish and Irish towns (they had been expelled from England), but they are so small in number they don't even register on the map mode

Other than that, it's all Catholic. But not for long.

> John Wycliffe has entered the chat.


Areas​

Based on the 4 provinces of Ireland (sorry Meath) and splitting England roughly into the larger Anglo-Saxon earldoms which have some similarity with the modern Regions (sorry Yorkshire).

areas.jpg





Provinces​

We have fixed the colours of the Provinces mapmode so you can see the individual provinces a bit more clearly. These are largely based on the historic counties, which have remained fairly constant throughout history, while merging some of those that are too small.

We’ve almost certainly offended someone.

The ancient Scottish shires are pretty messy and difficult to coalesce into neat provinces, so any suggestions for better arrangement there would be very welcome.

provinces.jpg




Locations​


You might notice that the locations in Ireland are varyingly written in both English and in Irish. This is because we have the new system up-and-running where we can name Locations by the primary culture of the country they are owned by.

This means that for example London might be called Londres if it was ruled by a Catalan country. It’s currently a WIP feature and we might add more elements, such as a game setting to base the name on dominant culture of the location instead, or to just use default (English) names.

locations.jpg




Government Types​

As with most of Europe, most of the countries are under some monarchy or another, but the Irish tuathas begin with the Tribe government type. This, among other mechanics such as [redacted] helps to give them a very unique playing style in Europe.

government.jpg


Countries​

England

England of course stands as the dominant kingdom in the isles. Despite having a lot of power resting on the barons, the country is fairly unitary even at this point, with very little practical separation between the crown’s power in somewhere like Kent versus Yorkshire. However there are notable exceptions.

The powerful Burgesses estate in the City of London enjoys ancient freedoms from royal power, while the king peers in from the Crown’s seat of power in neighbouring Westminster.

The County Palatine of Durham is not represented by a country, but buildings that give the Clergy Estate a huge amount of power in the locations it is present in. This also ties into political gameplay as a ██████████ ██████.

The newly created Duchy of Cornwall—the only duchy in England at the time—would also not be represented well by the Cornwall country, being a disparate set of manorial holdings that are ironically mostly in Devon. Cornwall of course exists as a releasable country though.

The Isle of Man is a little less certain. For now we have it as a subject of England. On paper it was a ‘kingdom’ awarded to William Montagu, the king’s favourite, however we aren’t sure if he actually wielded any real power on the isle. It changed hands between England and Scotland numerous times in this period, but in practice it appears to have been governed by a local council of barons. Any more details on exactly what was going on here in this period would be greatly appreciated.

These decisions have been made because as England heaves itself out of the feudal system, we thought it would be best if the small-fry inward-looking internal politicking is handled through the Estates and [redacted] systems, and then the diplomacy tracks are freed up for the English player to behave more outwardly against other major countries.

Wales

Though subjugated by conquest, Wales was not formally annexed into the Kingdom of England until the mid 1500s. As such the principality begins as a Dominion subject under England.

Those familiar with Welsh history will note that historically the Principality of Wales didn’t extend much beyond the old kingdom of Gywnedd. Much of the country to the southeast was in fact ruled by marcher lords, which we represent with a powerful Nobility estate in the valleys and beyond.

There is an alternative vision of Wales that I would like to gauge opinion on, and that is expanding it to include the Earldom of Chester and the marches on the English side of the modern border. If you are an Englishman familiar with modern borders this might look alarming, but these lands were also constitutionally ambiguous parts of the “Welsh Marches” until the 1500s. This will hand over to the Wales player the full responsibility of dealing with the marcher lords, allowing England to focus on bigger picture issues like beating France.

Ireland

Ireland is going through a moment of change. English royal power is centred on the Lordship of the Pale, the king’s Dominion ruling out of Dublin Castle. However, it struggles to keep a grasp on the rebellious Hiberno-Norman earls scattered around the island - some of whom remain as vassals, some of whom have managed to slip free of royal control.

The Tanistry system of succession endemic to the Gaelic Irish has its advantages, but it can also lead to chaotic feuds between rival branches. The so-called Burke Civil War has fractured the powerful Earldom of Ulster into rival Burke cousins who jealously feud over their shrinking lordships in Connaught. Native Irish princes of the north have reconquered most of their own lands from the de Burghs, but there are also two rival O’Neill cousins who style themselves King of Tyrone either side of the River Bann.

The feuding Irish lack a unifying figure, but anyone powerful enough could theoretically claim the title of High King. The former provincial kingdoms, such as Meath and Connacht, enjoy the elevated rank of Duchy, giving them a slight edge in the High Kingship selection.

Scotland

The chancer Edward Balliol continues his attempt for the Scottish throne, with England’s tacit permission. It’s hard to determine the exact lands held by Balliol in 1337, but we know his disinherited loyalists hold the castle of Perth while his English allies had seized large tracts of the lowlands from Bruce. Balliol has also bought the loyalty of the MacDonald and the other Hebridean galley lords by granting them remote land on the west coast of the mainland.

Meanwhile, Scotland’s canny regent Sir Andrew de Moray launches his decisive counterattack as his true king, David II de Bruce, waits in exile in France.

political.jpg


Dynasties​

We know about Plantagenet, Balliol, and Bruce, so I've zoomed in on Ireland to show the ruling dynasties of the various chieftains and earls.

dynasty.jpg


Population​

Excuse the seams and the greyscale mapmode. We have something better in the pipeline...

population_country.jpg
population_location.jpg




Well, thats it for now!

As always the team is eagerly awaiting your feedback and looking forward to the discussions. We’ll try to keep on top of the thread, but we have a teambuilding activity this afternoon so it might be a little more sporadic than usual!

Next week: Anatolia!
 
Last edited:
  • 218Like
  • 99Love
  • 7
  • 7
  • 1
Reactions:
Just wondering why Cheltenham is the name of the province when it is really a Georgian Spa town rather than anything from earlier times, along with the decision of Gloucester or Cheltenham provinces not producing wool as, the Cotswold region as a whole was famous for its production at the time and was the a large export of the region.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
To quote John of Travisa in the 14th century:

"All the language of the Northumbrians, and specially at York, is so sharp, piercing, rasping, and unshapely that we Southern men can hardly understand that language. I suppose this is because they are nigh to foreign men [i.e., Scots ] and aliens who speak strangely, and also because the kings of England dwell always far from that country."
Give us a Northumbrian culture Dave ;)
 
  • 14Like
  • 3
Reactions:
Issue with that is that the Yorkshire dialect spoken at the time was also a Northumbrian dialect rather than southern English.

I think the best option is to just include a separate Northumbrian culture north of the Humber.
Does different pronunciation == different culture?

I think this is much more important:
The English, though diverse in origin and with a variety of dialects, had already begun to coalesce in the face of the Viking invasions hundreds of years before.
 
  • 3Like
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions:
Does different pronunciation == different culture?

I think this is much more important:
The English, though diverse in origin and with a variety of dialects, had already begun to coalesce in the face of the Viking invasions hundreds of years before.
If pronunciation was so different that communication was incredibly difficult, then yes I'd say so.

The point of a Northumbrian culture would almost certainly be to fade away throughout the game, but whether different Northumbrian provinces fade into Scots or English would be dependent on where the Anglo-Scottish border would end up.
 
  • 4Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Location Rework in South Wales
I noticed your locations of Fishguard and Cardigan were in the wrong places and as seen in my population breakdown comment North Pembrokeshire is often separated from the South. So I added that and shifted the locations along to their correct geographic spots. In addition I added Newport which was a new and important rising town for English settlers at the start date and would grown in prominence as the game goes on. Otherwise all else is the same.

I am not an expert in the economies of these regions so Ill leave trade goods up to comments which ill edit in.


See - Welsh Population Comment
See - South West Location Rework
See - Overall Trade England/Population comment
See - Welsh Political Situation Comment

My first design 1.png
 
  • 14Like
Reactions:
Some thoughts on the north of England:

West Riding of Yorkshire
The West Riding really needs more locations - by the end of the game the West Riding would easily have a higher population than the other two ridings combined. Bradford, Sheffield, and Wakefield are all in the wrong place. Bradford should be in the northern part of Wakefield, whilst Sheffield should be in the south-western corner of the county. Replacing the majority of the Sheffield location I've added Pontefract - a key castle and centre of power for Thomas of Lancaster during the reign of Edward II. Where Bradford currently is the location should be renamed Skipton - another key castle and market town which controlled the Aire Gap between Yorkshire and Lancashire.

Lancashire
Lancashire also needs more locations, especially when Cumbria has five to Lancashire's three - Lancashire by far became a more populous and significant county. I'd keep the Manchester and Liverpool names - despite not being the names of the hundreds at this time they were important places. By the Tudor period John Leland described Manchester as the most significant town in the county, whilst Liverpool had been established as a borough and had a castle by the start of the game. The clearest omission is Preston, an important market town and crossing point of the River Ribble. Blackburn could also be added - one of the medieval hundreds and a town which became an important textile manufacturing centre - if this is too many locations that northern part of Manchester should be put in with Preston.

Cumbria
Cumbria looks good but I would rename Keswick to Penrith as this was a more important location with a castle as well as market.

The Pennines
For representing the Pennines I would add five impassable zones (red on the map):
  1. North Pennines - this would separate Keswick and Appleby from Hexham and Darlington.
  2. Yorkshire Dales between Skipton and Richmond
  3. Forest of Bowland between Skipton and Preston
  4. Boulsworth Hill between Bradford and Blackburn
  5. South Pennines between Manchester and Sheffield
This would leave several passes:
  1. Tyne Gap between Carlisle and Hexham
  2. Stainmore Gap between Appleby and Richmond
  3. Aire Gap from Skipton to Blackburn and Lancaster around both sides of Bowland
  4. Calder Valley between Bradford and Manchester


View attachment 1148401
I love your impassable regions, would just suggest Skipton to Kendal should be impassible due to the Howgill Fells and difficulty reaching Dentdale from the East or South, as well as the peak district blocking Sheffield to Buxton. Great Work though!
 
On culture: if I were doing this, there would be one extra culture over what is coded at the moment, and it would be Borderers.

The Borderers (and their fighting soldiery, the Reivers) were notoriously difficult to control, immensely valuable to the Percies in their armies throughout the Wars of the Roses, and the culture was ultimately forcibly suppressed by English and Scots after the Union of the Crowns, with significant immigration away from the UK in that period as people refused to assimilate - not least to the Appalachian mountains in the Thirteen Colonies, where they became known (profoundly inaccurately) as the Scotch-Irish.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1
Reactions:
thoughts on Wales;

1. it should be 2 areas roughly north and south similar to the map below, this would make a potential Glyndr rebellion more interesting.
1718379142593.png


the locations in Wales aren't great my suggested changes are to split Carnarvon roughly where I drew the line and name the eastern half Conway,

and rename the current Conway to Rhuddlan it was a very significant settlement at the time and more geographically accurate,

rename Montgomery to Machynlleth it is the location of Glyndwrs parliament and while not exactly precise geographically it is close and it's glaring that it's left out,

the location of Caerphilly on this map Is nowhere near the actual Caerphilly renamed to Brecon,

Wrexham should probably be renamed to either Denbigh or Ruthin as they where both more relevant at this time but I kinda love it being Wrexham so not a big deal.

I think Cardiff should be spit horizontally to be to the south Cardiff and to the north Rhondda as Cardiff including all of the valleys doesn't make sense but this is a less big deal than the others.
2.jpg


in terms of resources, Angelsey was historically nicknamed 'Môn Mam Cymru' meaning roughly the breadbasket of Wales so this area should produce wheat.

there should be a gold-producing area in Wales, Gold has been produced in various parts of Wales for thousands of years and it would likely greatly help with a Wales playthrough I suggest it be in either Carmarthen or Harlech.

if Carnarvon was split the new location for Conway should produce fish.

if Cardiff was split Rondda should produce Coal.

Those are all the thoughts I have on Wales rn id love people's opinions of them.
 
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions:
I've got a couple of ideas about the representation of Cheshire on the map, but for the most part it looks good.

The three locations look about right, but I'd add my voice to the people asking for Crewe to be renamed to Nantwich - Crewe was barely a hamlet before the railways arrived, while Nantwich was a market town next door.

The economy of Cheshire in the medieval era was very agricultural - mostly livestock (primarily cows, secondarily pigs), with some wheat growing and some lumber. Both Crewe and Macclesfield are good in that regard, but Chester produces wild game. I would guess this is because Chester incorporates the Wirral, which was a forest at this time, but the Wirral was fairly small and less populated compared to Chester and north Cheshire, which this location also contains. I think that the material that Chester should produce is livestock, because the Cheshire economy was (an still is) so dependent on it.

(A source about Chester's economy in this era)
https://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/ches/vol5/pt1/pp44-55
https://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/ches/vol5/pt1/pp64-80
 
thoughts on Wales;

1. it should be 2 areas roughly north and south similar to the map below, this would make a potential Glyndr rebellion more interesting.View attachment 1148406

the locations in Wales aren't great my suggested changes are to split Carnarvon roughly where I drew the line and name the eastern half Conway,

and rename the current Conway to Rhuddlan it was a very significant settlement at the time and more geographically accurate,

rename Montgomery to Machynlleth it is the location of Glyndwrs parliament and while not exactly precise geographically it is close and it's glaring that it's left out,

the location of Caerphilly on this map Is nowhere near the actual Caerphilly renamed to Brecon,

Wrexham should probably be renamed to either Denbigh or Ruthin as they where both more relevant at this time but I kinda love it being Wrexham so not a big deal.

I think Cardiff should be spit horizontally to be to the south Cardiff and to the north Rhondda as Cardiff including all of the valleys doesn't make sense but this is a less big deal than the others.
View attachment 1148412

in terms of resources, Angelsey was historically nicknamed 'Môn Mam Cymru' meaning roughly the breadbasket of Wales so this area should produce wheat.

there should be a gold-producing area in Wales, Gold has been produced in various parts of Wales for thousands of years and it would likely greatly help with a Wales playthrough I suggest it be in either Carmarthen or Harlech.

if Carnarvon was split the new location for Conway should produce fish.

if Cardiff was split Rondda should produce Coal.

Those are all the thoughts I have on Wales rn id love people's opinions of them.
Brecknock is another name for Brecon
 
South West Location Changes
I will state the Location - Trade Good

Cornwall
I feel it doesn't really represent the Cornish economy or make it realistic to have a 2 location province so I have added a 3rd location.
- Falmouth - TIn - lots of historic mining settlements at the foot of Cornwall
- Truro - Copper - becomes that is what St. Agnes mainly produced and a lot of the copper veins run through here.
- Launceston - Fish - so North Cornwall strangely did not have many mining settlements at this time period, so I think it is best to represent the Fisheries here as the fishing towns on the north coast were quite important.

Devon
There is a strong argument for 5 locations here as it is what fits the robust economy of the county during this period and its importance, plus its unique geographic conditions that separate the county into these natural areas. If you have not seen the comments between us Devonians there is plenty of academic sources on the economy here which we have based this off of, as fortunately there is a lot of surviving records which makes it a primary case study for medieval market towns.

- Barnstaple - Silver - Hills - Woods - Represents the Combe Martin/Brendon mines and North Devon is very isolated from the rest of Devon
- Okehampton - Hills - Sparse - Represents the Moors of Dartmoor and should be Tin to represent the mining and stannary towns of Dartmoor.
- Exeter - Flatlands - Grasslands - The largest town and regional capital shipped out huge percentages of the national Wool and Tin trade, I think having the province produce Wool would be best
- Totnes - Grasslands - Woods - should be Fish representing the fisheries of the south which were of huge importance. It could also be called Dartmouth, but eventually Totnes would become the 2nd most important settlement after Exeter
- Plymouth - Hills - Sparse - should be Silver representing the Berre Alston mine in the Tamar Valley and should be the 3rd most populace town.

Somerset
Splitting Bath and Bristol is essential imho, both were important settlements of their own right and is doesnt make sense to have Wells separate and them combined.

- Taunton - Maybe Wool would be a better fit economically at the time
- Wells - Stone
- Bristol - Wool (also likely the 3rd most populace town before the black death with upwards of 20k.
- Bath - Wool

Dorset

- Sherborne - I do not understand why Dorchester was the original name its right next to Weymouth near the coast. Sherborne is a much better fit - fruit is okay
- Weymouth - Sand
- Wareham - Marble - is a notable historic town and around this time is when it loses its importance to Poole, the isle of purbeck is included in my boundary which is where the marble quarries were.
- Poole - Salt - lots of evidence for medieval salt works in and around the town.

Gloucester
Issue over the location of Gloucester

- Berkely Cirencester (@Liam1234 for the better town) - Livestock, Grain, Fiber Crops can all make sense- added as the Gloucester location is strange, the city of Gloucester sits on the border with Dean.
- Gloucester - Livestock or Wool
- Dean - Iron - Named dean just because that is where the Iron was.
- Cheltenham, Wiltshire, etc. unchanged




View attachment 1148369
I like this set up a lot. Some nice additions to Devon and Cornwall especially.

I would add/change:
- not bothering to split Bristol but instead just renaming it Bath and renaming what you've put as Cirencester/Berkley as Bristol.
- Stone in Weymouth (Portland Stone)
- Fibre Crops in Gloucester if its spit from the Forest of Dean iron mines.
- Change Swindon to Marlborough as others have suggested.

Other than those I think that would be an accurate set up for the southwest, although still uncertain about topographical make up (waiting on that map).
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
- not bothering to split Bristol but instead just renaming it Bath and renaming what you've put as Cirencester/Berkley as Bristol.
Thanks for the comment, I agree with a lot of the other changes and will edit my comment to reflect that.

I disagree on the Bristol comment as I dont feel that represents the geographic location of Bristol, and Circencester imho is a key location for the rural aspects of Somerset. Bristol did and does not really have much to do with the Circencester location as the main market town was in Circencester and Castle Berkely oversaw the region. Also doesnt feel right having Bath as a coastal location
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
In regards to the areas: I believe that Béal Cú needs to be moved over to the Ulster area and Kilkenny to the Leinster area. Furthermore Longford should be moved over to the Connaught area as it was considered a part of Connaught up until about the 1800s.

I also think it'd be nice if the system by which locations are named based on the primary culture was extended to the naming of provinces and areas for Ireland.

Thank you for your time.
 
  • 1
Reactions:
On culture: if I were doing this, there would be one extra culture over what is coded at the moment, and it would be Borderers.

The Borderers (and their fighting soldiery, the Reivers) were notoriously difficult to control, immensely valuable to the Percies in their armies throughout the Wars of the Roses, and the culture was ultimately forcibly suppressed by English and Scots after the Union of the Crowns, with significant immigration away from the UK in that period as people refused to assimilate - not least to the Appalachian mountains in the Thirteen Colonies, where they became known (profoundly inaccurately) as the Scotch-Irish.
Scots irish were scots going from the colony of ulster to the colonies of the new world. The Border communities mightve assimilated into the Scots Irish communities, but there certainly was an accurately named group of Scots Irish
 
  • 4Like
Reactions:
London's modern borders seem to be shown here as the borders for the Middlesex province despite them being the borders of Greater London, drawn-up in 1960 I believe.
I think it would make more sense for Middlesex have it's historic borders.
Also, the London location doesn't have a single bit of London at the time (not sure fully though) so I'd suggest calling it maybe Ilford? I wouldn't know too much about East (modern-day) London at this time though.
Also this isn't a suggestion, but if you decide to split the eastern part of Southwark off for some reason, you could call it Greenwich.
Sorry for the long reply.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions:
I have to say, I don't love Surrey being partitioned and left as a wide Guildford under Sussex lol.
I do hope there are mechanics that allow for the uniting of London with Southwark and Westminster (hopefully this will be the case for Budapest and others too!), and if that requires them to be part of the same province, so be it - but I think Surrey deserves a province of its own.
Suggestions have already been made about additional locations, I think I'd atleast like to see Reigate, but Kingston, Woking and Farnham are good options too.
I'm also a little confused by the horses - I'm guessing this is for balance, but I think it'd be a shame for Surrey to not have some cloth production (another reason to give it some more locations!). I would also like if its ideal placement for the eventual gunpowder mills could be represented.
 
  • 3
Reactions: