• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Tinto Maps #14 - 9th of August 2024 - Western Africa

Hello, and welcome one more week to Tinto Maps, the day of the week for map nerds lovers! This week we will be taking a look at Western Africa! These lands were named historically in different ways, although probably the most widespread naming was Guinea, which also names the Gulf that makes for the southern limit of the region, with the Atlantic Ocean being to the west, the Sahara desert to the north, and the lands around Lake Chad making for the approximate eastern border.

With these regions, we’re also leaving the ‘Easy Mode Map-Making’ of Project Caesar, as getting comprehensive sources of information for 1337 for most of Sub-Saharan Africa is challenging, as the traditional historical record was oral, in contrast with the written records usual in Eurasia. In any case, we did our best to depict the rich history and geography of the region and its diversity, which is stunning. Let’s start, then!

Countries:
Countries.png

The most important country, and one of the world's great powers, is the Empire of Mali, which in 1337 is at its zenit, still ruled by the infamous Mansa Mūsā. It controls not only the core lands of the Mandé-speaking peoples, but also holds the overlordship over Jolof, most of the fertile Niger river basin, and some of the most important Saharan outposts. To its south-east, the Mossi are organized in several polities (Ougadagou, Gwiriko, Yatenga, Boussouma, Tenkodogo, and Liptako). South into the coast, Kong, Dagbon, Bonoman, and Mankessim are polities ruled by the Dyula, the Dagbani, and the Akan (the last two). To the east, Fada N’gourma, Borgu, and Mamprugu connect with the lands of the Hausa, which rule from several city-states: Kebbi, Gobir, Zafara, Katsina, Daura, Kano, Rano, and Zazzau. Further to the east, the Empire of Kanem rules the lands around Lake Chad from its capital in Njimi, and over some of the Saharan corridors, making it the region's second wealthiest country. And finally, further to the south, there are the lands of the Nupe, the Yoruba (Oyo, Ife, Ijebu, Owo), the Edo (Benin), and the Igbo (Nri).

Dynasties:
Dynasties.png

The dynasties of the region are a mix of well-known ones, such as the Keita of Mali, the Ndiaye of Jolof, or the Sayfawa of Kanem, and randomly generated ones for the rest of the polities, as we don’t have good enough sources on who was ruling over most of them in 1337.

Locations:
Locations.png

Locations 2.png

Locations 3.png

Locations 4.png
The locations of Western Africa. We’ve tried our best to find suitable locations, correct naming, etc., although I’m sure there might be plenty of feedback to apply.

Provinces:
Provinces.png


Areas:
Areas.png


Terrain:
Climate.png

Topography.png

Vegetation.png

This week we have proper Terrain mapmodes at the release of the Tinto Maps… Not much to say about them, though, as the climate and vegetation are pretty straightforward, being divided into Arid and Tropical; while the vegetation goes from desert and sparse beside the Sahara, to increasingly more forested terrain, until reaching the tropical jungles by the coast. The topography is not very fragmented, with the Guinean Highlands and the Adamawa Plateau being the most important landmarks.

Natural Harbors:
Harbors.png

A new map mode this week, coming from the latest Tinto Talks! There are some decent natural harbors in the region, with Banana Islands (where Freetown would be founded), Elmina, and Calabar being the best ones.

Cultures:
Cultures.png

A beautiful map this week… I may repeat that we tried our best to approach the region, taking into account that this was the first African region we completed, around 3 years ago. When we review it, we may add some more diversity, as we have now some more tools than the ones we had back in time, but we think that it’s way best to read your feedback first, to make sure we are on the same page.

Religions:
Religion.png

Take this map as very WIP. The Sunni-Animism division is kind of accurate, with the expected division for 1337 (Islam would later on advance more to the South, but we think this is the best for this date). What we have yet to do is to divide the ‘Animism’ population into some of the regional variants; we already have plenty of data, but we also want to read your feedback on this first.

Raw Materials:
Raw Materials.png

The goods of the region are quite diverse and very dependent on the geography. In the Saharan lands, there are plenty of locations with resources such as Salt, Copper, or Alum (regarding this resource, the lands to the north of Lake Chad make for the densest Alum hub in the world for 1337, something the historical sources talk about). Livestock is king in the Sahelian lands, while there are plenty of agricultural goods in the Niger river basin. The region is also full of luxury goods, of which Gold is the most relevant, as being the biggest supply of this metal to the Mediterranean and Europe in the Late Middle Ages, while also having others such as Ivory, Gems, or Spices (which in this region are portraying some goods such as kola nuts, or malagueta pepper). Finally, the coasts of the Gulf of Guinea have plenty of Fish. Maybe the only type of good that is not very abundant in the region is metals, as having some Iron, Tin, etc., but not much in comparison with other regions.

Markets:
Markets.png

Markets of the region, have an interesting distribution. The most important ones in 1337 are Niani, Kano, and Njimi, which are also connected to the Northern African markets, making it possible to get plenty of wealth by exporting well-demanded goods throughout the Sahara (for instance, exporting Gold or Alum for good money is a very viable strategy ATM). Later on, after the Age of Discovery, the coastal markets may get connected to other markets, making them more relevant, and maybe switching the power balance of the region from the North to the South, as historically happened (but take it as a ‘maybe’, not for granted, OFC!).

Population:
Population .png

Population 2.png

Population 3.png

Population 4.png

Population 5.png
Population of the region. We’ve improved a bit our tracking of the population data, to avoid further problems like the one we had with Germany. I can tell you that the total population of Western Africa is around 5.6M people, which is divided into 2.2M for the Sahel, and 3.3M for the coast of Guinea. You may very well notice that the hegemonic power here may be Mali, with around 700k people, but also that there are many more people not living under the rule of a polity, than living under it, which will make for interesting gameplay on how to deal with it (more about this in a later Tinto Talks, soon…).

And, speaking of that, I have the sad news that next Friday there is a bank holiday here in Spain, so there won’t be a Tinto Maps. The next one will be on Friday 23rd, and we will be taking a look at Eastern Africa! Until then, you may still stay tuned, as we will be replying to feedback, as usual, and we may have some informal maps incoming. Cheers!
 
  • 142Like
  • 69Love
  • 6
  • 4
  • 4
Reactions:
I saw a french documentary about Mansa Musa once and they said he wanted everyone to think he was rich because Mali just had infinite gold but actually most of his wealth came from trading slaves. Does anyone know anything about this?

Edit:
PS: Is there slavery at all in Project Caesar? It wasn't mentioned yet, was it?
He spent the first years of his reign preparing for the pilgrimage which involved raiding peripheral towns for slaves. His entourage consisted of 60,000 people, 12,000 of which were slaves, but no that was not at all where Mali's riches came from
 
He spent the first years of his reign preparing for the pilgrimage which involved raiding peripheral towns for slaves. His entourage consisted of 60,000 people, 12,000 of which were slaves, but no that was not at all where Mali's riches came from

Here, I found the doc. And actually what they're saying is that Malis might and wealth comes from controlling the trade of slaves and gold to the middle east and europe.
They're saying they get the slaves and gold from all of western Africa and then sell it.
It sounds less like Mali is just full of gold mines and more like they are really abusing their geographical position and big size.
 
To be honest I expexted you will treat most of Africa (maybe not Mali and Benin and Kongo and Easter Coast (Zanzibar)) the same as you treated them in Victoria 3. The idea of countries of "lower" level which can actually be colonized (lets say like hordes in EU3) is great. Making (like in EU4) some Mossi jungle tribe eqal to Mali or better, some euro-asia developed country is ridiculous.
 
  • 14
  • 1
Reactions:
"Songhai" culture could probably be divided into a bunch of different cultures in a single culture group. If it isn't, then imo it should be renamed to "Ayneha", since that's the collective autonym for the Nilo-Saharan speakers of the Niger basin.

I don't think they purposefully want to portray the technical 'rainforest' denomination, but want to reflect the vegetation density of tropical rainforests.

Due to never having winters, the undergrowth can continue to grow year-round, which really increases the level of difficulty to maneuver and reclaim these forests.

In e.g. temperate rainforests, winter is a limiting factor for the undergrowth, which is why I think 'forest' remains an apt classification for them, with jungle truely representing the most intense vegetation densities of the tropics.
I think subtropical rainforests, like the ones in the Pontic and Caspian coasts, at the very least could be included under "jungle" perhaps, but I'm fine with the current arrangement, it was a genuine question.

Distribution of rainforests around the world: Tropical rainforests shown in dark green; Subtropical and temperate rainforests shown in lighter green.
 
  • 7Like
  • 1
Reactions:
Probably because of setup reasons, each location has to have a culture and religion. It's the same in EU4, there are uncolonized provinces with 0 natives that still have a defined culture and religion.
I understand this in EU4 where culture and religion are province-based, but in this new game it's not the location that has culture and religion, but pops and map shows majority culture/religion, so imo no pop no culture shown.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Feedback regarding the Mossi:

1723289331727.png


1. Why is Mossi culture so widespread? Is it supposed to encompass all the Oti-Volta languages, or what?

For reference:

1723289397145.png

1723290069210.gif

Moore-speaking area inhabited by the Mossi people.

1723289420654.png


All areas inhabited by speakers of Gur languages, with 2 being Oti-Volta languages including Moore.

As far as I am aware, the culture didn't shrink over time, so while these maps are modern it gives a rough idea of what area they should inhabit.

2. Should Ougadougou (Wagadugu) really be so large? For example, they seem to own a lot of Gurunsi lands, but according to english wikipedia:

1723290756219.png

Daboya for example should not be owned by them either:
1723290910947.png

Paga probably didn't exist yet, but there might not be a better location name. In either case, that location was definitely not controlled by Wagadugu:
1723291026145.png


Gambaga should be owned by Mamprusi/Mamprugu Kingdom:
1723481330017.png

1723291139147.png


Wa is more unclear, but it should probably also not be owned by Wagadugu:
"Political, economic, and social developments between 1500 and 1900 led to the rise of Wa and the creation of the Waala Kingdom. Trans-Saharan trade routes passing through Wa exposed Wa to all participants in the trade and attracted some to settle in Wa."

On your map this place is inhabited by Gurunsi, and the Wala people are absent.

Tiebele and Pô are both slightly anachronistic, but there aren't really better names. The Gurunsi Kassena people settled the area in the 15th century, and I can't find who lived there before that. These towns originate from this settlement period. I suppose giving them to Wagadugu is a fine placeholder. Trying to find info on Léo just ends up giving results on Leo Africanus, so I don't know about that... it being Gurunsi is fine though.

Something I found funny though:
1723292224404.png


These locations are all neatly about the same size. However in real life:

1723292263217.png


3 of these settlements are right next to each other, while Léo is WAY further away. Not saying anything needs to be changed, as I think the settlements are still within the borders of their respective locations (hard to say without an overlay map with the same projection), but it's just amusing.

Why is Bankuy a location? As far as I can tell it's a small village with no historical or modern significance.

Anyways, finding info on other locations is difficult, so I cannot say if Wagadugu should own them or not. So at the very least, they shouldn't extend to far south. Their western border is up to debate, but keep in mind this area wasn't inhabited by Mossi people, but by various other cultures. However, I don't know how granular you want to be, so I'll leave the culture and ownership of these western locations up to you to decide.

Unrelated to Mossi, like others have said there are many anachronistic states in this area too, Gwiriko, Kong, Dagbon etc. which should not exist in 1337.
 

Attachments

  • 1723291482186.png
    1723291482186.png
    54,3 KB · Views: 0
  • 1723291093488.png
    1723291093488.png
    41,8 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
  • 6Like
  • 5
  • 1
Reactions:
Destroying the Animist menace
You said you want to do this, but it needs to be known *how* you're going to do it. If you want to be fully detailed, then every "pagan" culture should have its own religion, which could result in dozens of religions added. If you want less detail, you could create several larger groupings with shared features. Many west african native religions for example feature a monotheistic Creator God, who can have numerous names depending on culture.

If you're going with a unique religion for each culture, then the issue of ethnic religions appears again, like in many other places on the world map. Would you be able to spread a non-organized native religion to others besides your nation's primary culture? Even converting muslims to it? Does conversion result in culture change?

With cultural religions at least, naming would be easier in some cases, rather than having to come up with weird group names like "Fetishism" in eu4. For example, the Akan people have Akom as their religion, which even has its own symbol that could be used for the icon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akan_religion . Same is true for the Yoruba native faith: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoruba_religion

But these are exceptions. Many smaller cultures have no fancy modern name or symbol for their native religion. Like take the Mossi religion for example. What on earth would you call that? Like many other african religions, they have a creator god called Wende, various spirits, ancestor worship and religious masks. Is it distinct enough to be its own religion? Realistically yes, but gameplaywise? I dunno. Would you call it "Mossi faith", "Wendeism", or what? And these are the same questions you'd have to ask for *every single* ethnic group with its own ethnic native religion.

So yeah, I don't have an answer of how to do it. Just some food for thought.
 
Last edited:
  • 3Like
  • 2
Reactions:
@Pavía The General History of Africa Vol. 4 is from 1984, that's a very old secondary source. Newer publications should usually be considered as more reliable because they reflect the more recent state of the art which means that they also reflect the discussions on specific issues such as population figures. In demographic research, within the last four decades, we had the rise of computer science for modeling populations (which was only to some degree viable in the 1980s), combined with general trends of doing interdisciplinary research to conduct, e.g., historical linguistics and ethnographic approaches together with paleoenvironmental approaches and archeology. These are approaches that are relevant for discussions on the Anthropocene, which is again an entirely new concept that was popularized in the 1990s / early 2000s due to debates on climate change and environmental issues.

To get back to population figures, there is more than one generation of scholars that worked on population numbers after the General History of Africa. In this time period, there have been entirely new approaches and paradigms, like global and transnational history, environmental history, queer and gender studies, postcolonial studies, cultural studies, etc. etc.

The general trend of recent scholarship that put the figures for sub-Saharan Africa much higher than previously (?) are also reflected in Green (2012, p. 243):
  • 1300: 60M.; 1400: 60M.; 1500: 78M.; 1600: 104M.; 1700: 97M.; 1800: 92M.; 1850: 90M.; 1900: 95M.
What we tend to forget, due to the projections we use, is that (sub-Saharan) Africa is huge. Let's take a look at the Mollweide projection below:
View attachment 1173809
The Qing Empire had roughly 14,7 million square kilometers, whereas sub-Saharan Africa has 24,3 million square kilometers. Europe, on the other hand, only has about 10 million square kilometers. That is, sub-Saharan Africa is about 66% larger than the Qing Empire. China currently has 1,4 billion people, whereas sub-Saharan Africa has 1,2 billion people. Population projections for the year 2100 estimate 3 billion people for sub-Saharan Africa.

The point is that it's not implausible at all that sub-Saharan Africa had somewhere between 30-50 million inhabitants in 1300, given its enormous size and enormous resources, and considering the current trajectories in population growth. Moreover, since we do have much more reliable sources for population figures in later centuries, we can at least infer (backcast) what the population figures might have looked like in 1300, considering that we would have to calibrate the growth rates to explain the numbers that we deem as more reliable. Exactly this is what population modeling has been doing in the last couple of decades.

Reference
Green, E. D. (2012). Demographic change and conflict in contemporary Africa. In J. A. Goldstone, E. P. Kaufmann, & M. D. Toft (Eds.), Political demography: How population changes are reshaping international security and national politics (pp. 238–263). Oxford University Press.

*edit* I double checked Green, and the figures of 50-60M. are rather old, too (1979). Currently checking for newer academic sources in journals instead of books, might take a day or two.
I don't have much skin in the game of population numbers in Africa. As you mention Sub-Saharan Africa is estimated to have ~60 million people circa 1300.

One source I found through a simple google search cites a 1700s estimate of ~140 million people. So I think 60 million for all of Sub-Saharan Africa is a fair total estimate in 1337, maybe a bit on the upper bound, thing is I'd argue its really hard to get any decent estimates for the congo jungle.

But Sub-Saharan Africa contains the following regions according to Eu4:

West Africa
East Africa
Horn of Africa
Congo
Central Africa
South Africa

If you were to divide these evenly you'd get get ~10 million per region.

Yet I'd think everyone would agree it'd be kind of absurd to evenly distribute these.

This Tinto Talks is about Western Africa so lets focus on that.

My source claims that in 1700s for a total population of 140 million West Africa held 50 million, so about 36%. Which surprisingly (to me at least) tracks pretty well with todays percentages.

The UN sub region defined as West Africa has a population estimate of 418mil, and Africa's pop estimate is around 1.216 billion. So today west africa makes up ~34% of total african population.

So lets just say 35% of african population should be in West Africa; 60 mil for west africa would mean a total population of 21 million.

Which honestly I DO NOT think is ABSURD. It kinda meets both people in the middle, the ones who claim Mali alone had ~50 million people (lmao) and those who say West Africa wasn't that populated.

IMO 21 million isn't that much for a land mass roughly 5 times the size of Zhongyuan (China's historical, political, economic, cultural and population center).

Two caveats I would add is that depending on the source you could have different definitions of west Africa at least compared with how Project Caesar defines it, thus getting bloated populations or significantly reduced numbers.

Second caveat would be that depeding on how they define East Africa in PC it might have not only a higher population but a higher % of the total sub-saharan population.

IN any case my final opinion would be that 21 mil is ok but still too high, maybe ~15 mil would be good.

the source i mentioned (idk if its any good):
 
  • 8
  • 3Like
  • 2
Reactions:
4. What sources did you use? Most I have seen list significantly higher numbers, why couldn't Mali have the population of France? France was a backwater nation in 1337, Mali was causing worldwide inflation through its wealth. I know we have had a couple of centuries of "Africa was just a bunch of tribes", but modern sources do not seem to corroborate this. Even sources when the Europeans first arrived describe large cities with large populations, not words lightly used by visitors from cities such as Venice, Genoa or Lisbon.
Farmland issue. There's a lot of really shallow soil, and not much loess across the whole of it. The areas of Hausaland and their downstream companions were fed by dust storms from Lake Chad, but most of the region didn't get the benefit. France was a strong regional player in a hard-to-place region in the 1300s. Missed a major agricultural innovation with early rototillers (for some reason), but otherwise has respectable agricultural output.
 
6 million does seem a bit on the low end considering that over 10 million were shipped to the Americas over a couple hundred years (unless there was big population growth between the start date and the 1600s)
Only 5.5M from West Africa, but the point stands.
View attachment 1173668
I mean... not like West Africa is that much smaller than the core area of China.
Direct point-for-point comparison there would lead to you having to treat the Inner Niger Delta as comparable with the Yellow or Yangtze river, which unfortunately has never been the case. Optimally-placed natural farmland will always support larger populations than savanna/sahel land, unless it enjoys some source for deposits.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
I don't have much skin in the game of population numbers in Africa. As you mention Sub-Saharan Africa is estimated to have ~60 million people circa 1300.

One source I found through a simple google search cites a 1700s estimate of ~140 million people. So I think 60 million for all of Sub-Saharan Africa is a fair total estimate in 1337, maybe a bit on the upper bound, thing is I'd argue its really hard to get any decent estimates for the congo jungle.
Here's multiple estimations for all of Africa, so that's including North Africa, none of which are anywhere near 140 mil for 1700.


1723295164947.png
 
  • 1
Reactions:
IMO 21 million isn't that much for a land mass roughly 5 times the size of Zhongyuan (China's historical, political, economic, cultural and population center).
West Africa south of the Sahar is about 4 million km2, which at 6 million people is 1.5people/km2 or 5people/km2 for 20 million people.

10-40people/km2 is the range seen in most of Europe, India and China.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Direct point-for-point comparison there would lead to you having to treat the Inner Niger Delta as comparable with the Yellow or Yangtze river, which unfortunately has never been the case. Optimally-placed natural farmland will always support larger populations than savanna/sahel land, unless it enjoys some source for deposits.
Today's population of West Africa and the Central Plains of China are roughly equal (at least with my rough calculations)

And West Africa is 5 times the size of the Central Plains, i don't think its absurd to say that in 1337 all of West Africa had a quarter of Chinas population
 
Today's population of West Africa and the Central Plains of China are roughly equal (at least with my rough calculations)

And West Africa is 5 times the size of the Central Plains, i don't think its absurd to say that in 1337 all of West Africa had a quarter of Chinas population
West Africa today is subject to rules and exceptional arrangements that don't translate neatly to 1337 West Africa. Nitrogen fertilizer wasn't readily available, Europe didn't try to maintain a political stranglehold through protectionist food exports, modern medicine hadn't made most of Africa safe for natives and foreigners alike, etc.
I used to hold your position and use the same arguments just a few years ago, but Mali's agricultural output back then wasn't such that it could sustain Niane's projected population.
 
  • 6Like
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions:
Here's multiple estimations for all of Africa, so that's including North Africa, none of which are anywhere near 140 mil for 1700.


View attachment 1173915
These sources from the 70s and 80s.

I tried looking for more recent sources (2000s).

I also think 140 is way too much. But even some of the sources you cite give a ~100 mil estimation, such a populatin in 1700 would support and argument for 40-50 mil in 1337 I think.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
I found this article specifically on African population estimates, from what I’ve skimmed it seems the overall estimates have gotten bigger rather than smaller over the years. (Though it is focused on a later period) I feel like the population should be revised upwards, as it stands it seems too slanted to the very low estimates. Also as it stands Mali seems to be quite underpopulated in comparison to the rest of West Africa, from what I’ve read it’s generally portrayed as the most urbanized and densely settled part of the region.

I remember a report from 1960s Berkeley concluding that Yorubaland was, far and away, one of the most densely populated societies, not only in West Africa, but on the planet.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
Good resource on the Yoruba and their oral history: https://dn790008.ca.archive.org/0/items/historyofyorubas00john/historyofyorubas00john.pdf
Much of what I write here comes from this book, except areas where I put other sources.

This is another source that challenges the Ketu and the Sabe having proper kingdoms prior to 1500s: https://books.openedition.org/ifra/389

I have listed some Yoruba kingdoms here.

  • Igbajo is a kingdom and city that exists since at least the 12th century according to oral history.
  • Efon-Alaye are a kingdom and city that exists since at least the 12th century according to oral history.
  • The Owu are attested as having migrated in the 19th century but oral history denotes that they had a kingdom before then. (Not to be confused with the Owo)
  • The Ketu have one of the oldest capital cities in the Yoruba region. The second source posits some questioning about their dynastic origins, arguing that they only were solidified politically after the 1550s. However, their city appears to predate that according to the The Story of Ketu: An ancient Yoruba kingdom, with it being populated from the 13th century.
  • The Sabe are recorded in oral history as already existing as a defined entity by this time. However, we do not have good confirmation on them until much later in the 16th century and the second source I posted raises the argument that there is reason to believe the Sabe did not exist prior to Oyo expansion, and arose likely c. 1500.
  • Orile Egba maybe could be represented as a tag. It is an Egba city-state and was formed by the Alake of Egbaland. It later would be destroyed in the 18th century and rebuilt as Abeokuta. It was formed by people fleeing the Oyo in the 12th-13th century but from my understanding, the Oyo would go on to conquer it- I do not know the date when it would be conquered.
  • Ijesas inhabit the area known as Ijesasland and formed a kingdom in 1300 around the city of Ilesa. They descend from the Ife-Ife. They would either be called Ilesa or Ijeshaland or Ijesha Kingdom.
  • Ekitis are a group of Yoruba people that may descend from an earlier pre-Yoruba ethnicity from my understanding. They were split into 16 kingdoms called:
    • Otun, Ijero, Adó, Ikole, Ara, Ahaye, Akure, Ogotun, Ido, Aiyede, Igbo Odo, Oye, Omuwo, Irè, Isé, Itaji
    • Among these, Òtun, Ijero, Adó and Ikole are supreme. Otun and Ijero are especially prominent and important. Wikipedia references that Otun became the main kingdom during the colonial period. I’d recommend representing at least Òtun and Ijero.
  • Ila (Ila Yara) is a kingdom formed around the 12th century, which had ties to the Ekitis but was not a part of their culture or political structure. It split in the 15th century between two different kingdoms. It should be represented as a tag. (Further reference: https://books.google.com.br/books?id=hDCdDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y)
  • Ondo was a kingdom formed around the 1200s. Supposedly by a retinue fleeing from the Oyo kingdom after the Oyo king had decided to murder one of the twins his wife had given birth. They should be represented as a tag by this time.
  • (Not from the book) Ọ̀bà civilisation was a Igbomina Yoruba kingdom that seems to have collapsed at some period and divided between various competing city kingdoms. I know little about them except that their collapse led to the birth of various other city-states claiming their heritage.
    • Isedo was a kingdom formed in 1250 by a prince from the Oba.
    • Other cities include Oke-Ila Orangun (Isedo-Oke), Ila Orangun (Isedo), Ora-Igbomina, Ipoti-Ekiti, Isanlu-Isin, Oke-Onigbin, Omu-Aran, Rore, Oyan, Inisha, Ipee, Oke-Ode, Babanla, Ajase-Ipo, Omupo, Esie, Oro, Ijomu-Oro, Iddo-Oro, Ahun, Idofin, Ado-Eku, Oreke, Sanmora and Pamo
  • Apa is supposedly a kingdom that existed from 1250 near Lagos. Whether they were independent at this time I do not know (https://www.apakingdom.com/the-history-of-badagry-apa).
Contemporary map of Yorubaland:

AD_4nXfXE2ScyPf7Czv5ltsUoAPSioixSNoZS9PC82BfRz4KUvzC7A2qKAz5HeGPpDs-GjXnbENnyZn5xSlrH6mfxr00g9B8yU4SxMYsVASqCnu8auMGrVQTxGPT6LC_yJ3DtzGoEsnXS3c3tV1LHxrLqHVJTPo


Arguably you could represent ALL Yoruba ethnicities as their own kingdoms, even those that I have not mentioned here given how urbanised the Yoruba were. Any that I have not mentioned here can be given the government of "tribe".

A source that I have not gotten full access to: https://www.cambridge.org/core/book...-and-society/CC682B3D24A7A9648C018BABC1E2EDEA

Also like another poster mentioned, please show the Ardra kingdom in contemporary south Benin.
 
  • 16Like
  • 7
Reactions: