I guess I just had one of those moments myself because for some reason I though that the UVR had the OTL
Balkan Region (I swear it was not intentional).
Don't give me any ideas.
The more I think about it I can see Turkistan being similar to Spain and it having a Spanish Civil War type of conflict in were expeditionary forces from Iran, the Raj, and UVR all fighting for control with the Fascist side wining. Then take some inspiration from Austria and have Turkistan reorganize into a Federal State of Turkistan (similar to what Austria was like from
1934–1938 of OTL) then have TTL's Engelbert Dollfuss/Franco character is assassinated an replaced with a pro-Raj leader who allows Turkistan to be annexed by the Raj like Austria was to Germany during the Anschluss?
I'm pretty sure "Austria" was Paksthana in old lore, while Afghanistan and Turkestan were Czechoslovakia and Poland respectively, but I feel like the post WW1 Central Asia situation will be reworked, like China forcing the entire region together in a Yugoslavia like situation, which might fit better than that parallel being applied to the Bulbancha government/CSA and the UPRH.
Turkestan was more of the Poland in that it was the first to be attacked in World War II, while the "Paksthana" (most likely will be deleted as explained below) was the "1938 Austria." I thinkI'll change it so that initially Turkestan has Afghanistan and the "Paksthana" parts, but it soon enters a civil war between Turks, Afghans, Indians, and equalists which draws in all of its neighbors. But then that would mean I have to get the Reich involved in the war some other way. Maybe I'll just have the Angeloi rebel first, then the rest of the Axis come to support the Angeloi.
On that note, I wonder how the
HOI3 tags and national cabinets would be reworked? I assume both the
Angeloi and Loyalist cabinets memebers would get renamed.
Yes, they'll be entirely ditched, but I'll keep the names of some of the Indian ministers. Angeloi and Loyalist ministers will be renamed to original characters. "Franco" in particular will be more thoroughly Norse.
As for the Polish-Soviet war parallel you could combine it and the Soviet–Japanese border conflicts of which Khalkhin Gol being the most famous into one event?
No, wouldn't really make sense to combine the two.
Makes me wonder about the insurgency in southern Rusia and if it will still play a part. Also would something like the
Guerrilla war in the Baltic states still happen?
It should still be there.
One idea for the ground that the Temple of Uppsala could be that the UVR could plan on building something like OTL's
Palace of the Soviets (or some other Soviet construction project that was never built) but in TTL planning on it is halted by WWII and the stand in for Trotsky is similar to Stalin in that they losses interest in the project after the war?
Yeah, they could do that, since they did the same thing to Brandenburg Palace. On a side note, "Sanssouci Palace" (rename pending) would probably be built in Brandenburg an der Havel (on the site of an older castle that was destroyed by the Mexica), while Hohenzollern Castle in Hechingen would be the residence of the Zollerns (presumably raised to imperial immediacy too by the main branch).
So since the Committee used Wilhelmina to legitimize some of their policies then can't our modern Wilhelmina use this law to claim the throne in the current part of the story?
Jerusalem used the illegitimacy argument to discredit the entire modern line of Hohenzollerns after they no longer had a use for Wilhelm Karl and his son, allowing them to deny Wilhelmina a claim and keep the throne empty so the committee can rule as permanent regents for an empty throne. At that point, the rule of law and the Augustinian Code have been thoroughly trampled, so any attempts to apply and enforce the law will fall on deaf ears. The only thing that could have put Wilhelmina on the throne was military force, which she didn't have. She can't do it now that the committee is gone, because people have a problem not with her but with the idea of monarchy in general.
Speaking of buildings. I know that in the past we talked about how the Chinese Tulou and Haudenosaunee Long House could be the bases of pre-industrial skyscrapers and apartment buildings respectively. Another idea that for some pre-Industrial Cities could come from
Shibam in Yemen in how despite most of the buildings made out of mud it has gained the nicknames of "Manhattan of the Desert" and "Chicago of the Desert"?
Good ideas. I can see skyscraper-like architecture emerging in Fusang, especially in Hongzhou because of all of the mountains nearby and the abundance of really sturdy wood.
I see, so I take it Ida would have some parallels to Matilda to Flanders as well as
Matilda of Tuscany, especially since both Matilda's had
rumors of infidelity.
Yep. Maybe also Sikelgaita too if I have her commanding troops in battle, though she would be staying behind in Germany most of the time to watch over Friedrich's domains when he's off campaigning. The relationship between William/Matilda of Flanders and Friedrich/Ida would also have parallels, since both men would be fully devoted to their wives (William in OTL took no mistresses and had no illegitimate children, which was unusual for medieval kings), who in turn were powerful figures in their own right. Matilda of Tuscany would still have allegations of infidelity but from the papal side now, since I'm having her eventually align with the imperial faction because her legal husband remained a major papal ally.
I also wonder if Fredrich would have parallels to the life of his other Norman rival in Robert Guiscard? If nothing else, I could see echoes of Robert's nephew
Roger II appearing in the reign of Fredrich the Great and his successors through his tolerance and cosmopolitanism.
No, I don't think so. Robert was a conqueror, not an administrator like Roger. From what Anna Komnena says of him, his record during sieges, and the words on his epigraph, he seemed like quite a ruthless and intimidating leader. While William had the same background as Friedirch, Robert would have the same military capabilities, but neither of them had Friedrich's tolerance and kindness.
While looking this up, I realized there could possibly be a time where Robert, his brother William Iron Arm, and Harald Hardrada
yet again could conceivably be fighting together under George Maniakes during his campaign in Sicily.
Alternatively, you could put the coat of arms in the middle of this flag. I wonder if this could work? My other idea is putting the eagle over a flag using the colors of both the OTL
German empire and
modern Germany with purple added somewhere, taking inspiration from Fusang's flag. Maybe you're idea could be used for the replacement of the
Cold War era war flag.
I suppose that works for the modern flag, putting the Zollern coat of arms in the middle over the chi-ro. For the medieval era, when it would be a coat of arms on a banner, it would be the eagle set over the Zollern coat of arms, to symbolize the imperial status of the Hohenzollerns and their reunification of the two empires. I don't think using the colors of the German Empire make sense, since those were based on Prussian and Hanseatic colors, while the modern German flag colors seem to have their roots in the liberal revolutions of the 1840s. Though I can see certain political movements adopting a tricolor (or 4-5 color flag) without the eagle and the Hohenzollern black and white.