• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Dev Diary #165 - Tributaries & Confederations

Hello there!

Welcome back to the first official dev diary for our Core Expansion this year, Khans of the Steppe. For those who did not see it, we first talked about the DLC back last month with Dev Diary #162 - Steppe by Steppe, so I recommend reading that first.

Today we will discuss Tributaries, Confederations, and Raid Intents. All three topics were mentioned in the previous Dev Diary, but we will discuss them at length in this one, so let’s settle in like a migrating nomad and get started.

Follow-up from Previous Dev Diary

The team has gone through an intense iteration period based on both feedback collected internally and the comments received from our previous Dev Diary. Many changes have been thus made, and we are sure we are not done with it yet. However, here's a small list of some of the most significant tweaks done based on your feedback:
  • A new, "base" Tributary type has been made available for non-Nomads.
  • Concerns about the Nomadic economy have been addressed by adding a monthly income for nomads based on their Herd size (symbolizing the trade of meat, hides, etc.)
  • A game rule has been added to include Nomadic governments in the Sahel, Arabia, the horn of Africa, Sami and Karelia regions
  • Tweaked the borders of the Steppe and characters who should be nomadic in all bookmarks (more than I can list here, screenshots will be shared in following Diaries)
  • We've added a Culture and Faith specific to your Nomadic Capital, different than your own
  • Adventurers can now become Nomads if they move into a Herder holding
  • We have expanded what we originally scoped for razing
  • We've extended and altered the effects of some Seasons
  • We have made it possible to grow your herd if you hold lands outside of the Steppe, giving those counties Fertility if held by a nomad

Tributaries

One of the new features we’re introducing with Khans of the Steppe, and the free update that goes along with it, are Tributaries. Vast nomadic realms like the Cumans, Khitans, and Khazars were not kept together by a tiered system of formal vassalage and pledges of fealty, nor were they delineated by culture or religion. Instead, the harsh realpolitik of the steppe applied - whoever could muster the greatest capacity for destruction on their neighbors proved themselves worthy of tribute, in exchange for the privilege of not being trampled underhoof. Modeling this type of subject relationship properly was the impetus for the Tributary feature.

Let's back up a bit and discuss some fundamentals first though, because tributaries aren't just a nomad thing. While Tributaries are similar to vassals in some respects, they represent a whole new type of unequal diplomatic relationship in the game. As a result, many game elements that formerly referred to "vassals" now refer to "subjects" instead. Subjects can be either vassals or tributaries, and these sub-types adhere to different rules. As with vassal contracts, there can be different types of tributary contracts with varying degrees of obligations. In most cases, these terms can be renegotiated.

Tributaries can be seen as a more independent subject type compared to vassals. While in most cases they share the map color and realm name with their suzerain, they can act and be interacted with independently, even when it comes to warfare. Most tributary types can also be created through peaceful means, by a sovereign ruler pledging tribute to a nomadic realm in exchange for a guarantee to not be attacked by them, or through a nomadic ruler demanding tribute from a neighboring realm. Agreements of tribute are (usually) perpetuated across generations, but may change in nature over time or be more easily broken when the contract changes hands.

image-01.png

[Marzoban Tokku and his weak backbone stands little chance against the persuasive might of the Cumanian horde]

image-02.png

[If some scary nomadic realm is on your border and you'd like to remain as independent as possible, you can proactively choose to pay them tribute to avoid outright conquest]

image-03.png

[Existing vassals can be released as tributaries, and in some cases you can even vassalize an existing tributary]

Nomadic Tributaries are what you will encounter most frequently in Khans of the Steppe. These consist of nomadic realms (or spineless herders) who have pledged tribute to a stronger nomadic ruler on their border. They will pay a part of their herd in tribute on a regular basis, and some of the prestige they gain will also be conferred upon their suzerain. In exchange for tribute, they enjoy a great deal of independence from their suzerain and will not be outright attacked or raided by them. They can even have tributaries of their own!

Settled Tributaries are non-nomadic realms (such as feudal princes, tribes, or clans) who have yielded to a bordering nomadic ruler. Like their nomadic tributary counterparts, they will pay tribute on a regular basis, but instead of herd they will provide gold and levies.

Both these types of tributary contracts are inherited across generations, but they also have quite a bit of leeway in simply ceasing payments (if they are ready to face the consequences of insulting their suzerain, that is). This is most likely to happen if a nomadic suzerain prove themselves weak in some way (and therefore unworthy of tribute, by the laws of the steppe), like losing a war or suffering a chaotic Kurultai succession. Once tributaries opt to stop sending gifts to their suzerain the suzerain can choose to attack them to recover control, or let them go try to make their own destiny without their protection. To try to keep this from happening, nomadic suzerains can either be lenient with their contract conditions, or leverage their Dread to demand Obedience of their tributaries.

image-04.png

[Your subject view will display if any of your tributaries are likely to stop paying you and why. Obedience plays a strong role in keeping your subjects in line, but even disobedient ones will be reluctant to stop paying off much stronger suzerains. More factors will be added before launch, such as losing a war or having chaotic Kurultai successions.]

A third type of subjugated tributary has also been added, which has no direct relation to nomads. This is a tributary type obliged to pay a lot of gold and a small amount of prestige to their suzerain in exchange for their suzerain's protection from outside invasion. If attacked, a subjugated tributary can call their suzerain in to defend them, and if they refuse their tributary obligations are annulled. Any non-nomadic realm can create this type of tributary through the Bring Under Tribute casus belli, enabling the extortion of neighboring protectorates through sheer military might.

This contract does not get inherited by the suzerain's heir upon their death, but also cannot be voluntarily broken. If the tributary wishes to break free of their obligations prior to their suzerain's death, they will have to fight them for independence.

image-05.png

[Even feudal realms can subjugate neighboring kingdoms to make them pay tribute, if their Crown Authority is high enough]

It's important to note that it's possible to modify the terms of a tributary contract, just like a vassal contract. For example, nomads can negotiate for protection by their suzerains in exchange for higher tribute payments. If you and your tributary are Blood Brothers, you can even negotiate a guarantee that they will follow you on all military adventures, offensive as well as defensive.

image-06.png

[Even the tributary can try to renegotiate the terms, but without a good relationship with (or a hook on) your suzerain this might be met with limited success]

Another aspect of tributaries of nomadic realms is that they can provide new Men-at-Arms types to their suzerain. In keeping with the flexible and heterogenous nature of steppe warfare, nomad rulers are able to recruit Men-at-Arms from both tributaries and vassals as if they were their own. Since the Men-at-Arms are recruited from other realms, rather than an additional cost of herd (to represent the development of more advanced mounted units) this costs a premium in gold to entice the foreigners to join up with the Khan's formidable horde.

image-07.png

[If you don’t have any subjects with access to some of the basic Men-at-Arms types, you get a little hint suggesting who might give you access to them…]

Visually, tributary realms will typically adopt the map color and name of their suzerain to clarify the relationship between them. Modders might be interested to know that this behavior can be changed in script depending on the subject contract: you can make tributary types that do not inherit the suzerain's color or name, or just one of them, as well!

image-08.png

[In 867, the Khazars dominate the Western Steppe while the Kirghiz control the Eastern parts. The Karluks and Ohguz are powerful nomadic realms in the central steppe region and have a lot of opportunity to compete for the smaller nomadic and tribal realms towards the northern parts.]

image-09.png

[In 1066 the western and central steppe regions are dominated by the Cumans in the south, with a considerable tributary network maintaining their control of the center and maintaining their power against the Karluks and Khitans. The Pechenegs have migrated west and act as a buffer zone between the steppe and the Byzantine Empire - will they manage to become their own nomadic powerhouse, or fall to either of their titanic neighbors?]

image-10.png

[In 1178, the Cumans remain the most powerful nomadic realm on the steppe, but for how long? The Khitans are migrating south into East Asia, leaving their old lands to the fractured Mongols to thrive.]

Since tributaries inherit all of the functionality of the vassal contract system, with a few extensions, they are very flexible and capable of modeling a great deal of unequal relationships between realms and rulers. There's a fair chance you will see more tributary types and dynamics added to the game in the future, and the system is fully available to modders to play with as well!

But how would you deal with these massive, aggressive nomadic realms as a smaller nomad who just wants to live a laid-back, peaceful nomadic lifestyle? One avenue to that is what we'll discuss next.


Confederations

Brothers and sisters, do you ever tire of lusting after power? When you jump into a game as a meek little Count, do you wish friends and neighbors would stand together with you against the masters of the world? Do you want something new to do as a tribal? Say no more, my brothers and sisters - but the sacred words, the oath of confederation!

In short, Confederations are a new way for nomads and tribals to feel safe while initially building their power, playing tall, etc. It’s also a bit of an extra challenge for those looking to easily gobble up areas of the map that lack a mighty King or Emperor.

image-12.png

[12th c. Estonia mightn’t have looked quite like this, but hopefully this captures some of its spirit]

The inspiration for Confederations came from a visit to beautiful Tallinn, Estonia (which I very highly recommend), a fascinating conversation with a very learned scholar in medieval Baltic history, and a visit to the Great Guild Hall Museum. Therein, an exhibit asked the question — “Why did Estonia not become a Kingdom?”

It’s an interesting question, with at least a few answers. In a sense, the Estonian tribes did actually have kings, but these were temporary war-leaders or spiritual figures, and they did not serve to unite all the tribes together into one lasting polity. They are mentioned, as stubborn figures of resistance, in the Christian chronicles of conquest. This kind of defensive decentralization seemed new for CK3; I immediately wanted to represent it in our game. And, of course, there are the steppe confederations of history — the Khamag Mongol, the Kimek-Kipchaks, the Mogyërs, and so on — to consider and draw from as well. I’m also a Canadian btw, and Confederation has been a force of history around the Great Lakes for quite a while.

Let’s go through the confederating process, and discuss.

image-13.png

[The Decision that lays the path to Confederation]

The first step is a Decision that enables you to offer Confederation to other rulers. Its warnings are to be taken seriously — you will likely have to leave your Confederation if you want to increase your station in the world (through means like title creation, migration, Dominance) or enrich yourself by raiding/attacking your fellow weaklings.

image-14.png

[The requirements for starting a Confederation; you have to be something of a small fish]

Who can make a Confederation? Well, you have to be standing on your own, and you can’t be standing very tall. These same restrictions apply to all prospective Confederates.

image-15.png

[Additional Confederation triggers. Most of the time, you’ll need a big, scary common foe]

Confederations in Crusader Kings III will be fleeting, ephemeral things, and focused largely on deterring the depredations of powerful neighbors. Thus, they will almost always be created in response to major powers being at their borders. It’s been really cool to watch Conquerors and great kings arise and, as they do, Confederations spring up all along their underbellies like nests of rats or colonies of fire ants. There is now a third, sometimes-viable alternative to “submit or die.”

The possible faith hostility trigger also works really nicely along the borderlands between pagan tribals and reformed faiths: it means the former can often be seen making the Confederation defensive arrangement to resist the brutal tide of history.

image-16.png

[You’re ready for Confederation… you just need a buddy to join you]

Given Confederations are available across the map, to both nomads and tribals, related content is laced with conditional loc and effects to keep things from feeling too inappropriate. That said, this isn’t a content-heavy feature; development on Confederations instead focused on making it an effective new mechanic.

image-17.png

[The interaction used to create a Confederation, and also to add new members]

The character interaction Offer Confederation (unlocked by the Call for Confederation decision or by Confederation membership) is how this brothers-in-arms, last stand-style shit comes to pass. Notice that, because migration removes members from the Confederation, there are incentives to stay put for a bit longer (a positive County Fertility modifier and an immediate County Fertility boost). AI should also be more reluctant to migrate than usual, at least for a few years.

image-18.png

[Weights are pretty comprehensive and pretty make-or-break]

Your level of investment in your confederation can make a big difference in its strength: herd, prestige and hooks can be sacrificed to make valid members more willing to join.

image-19.png

[Well isn’t that nice - he accepts!]

image-20.png

[Note the Confederation icon and breakdown]

Confederations aren’t a title. Their closest equivalent is an alliance or truce, thus they live in the Diplomacy space of the Character view. Here, you can see all members of the Confederation.

The Kimek Confederation is a culture-based name, which happens when both the first members are of the same culture. When they aren’t, the Confederation will be named after the founder’s de jure duchy (ex. the Semey Confederation, the Kargassia Confederation).

image-21.png

[A handful of Kimeks have joined the Confederation (squint, it’s on the left)]

On the map, Confederations will look similar to the new Tributaries: their individual realm names are replaced by the overall Confederation and their map colors are blended towards the main Confederation color (which is based on the founder’s capital).

You may notice that the members remain rather unevenly-sized. That’s because only independent top rulers are members of the Confederation, and their vassals (if they have any) are not.

image-22.png

[The Confederation is attacked!]

When a Confederation member is attacked is when the organization really comes into its own. All members are automatically added as Defenders. This can result in a pretty potent nest of bees that the aggressor has just poked. Accordingly, the combined strength of a Confederation is shown when opening the Declare War screen on one of its members, and AI should be appropriately hesitant to attack strong Confederations.

Note that this applies only to members’ defensive wars. They cannot call on the Confederation when they themselves declare offensive wars.

image-23.png

[The Decision for when a Confederate decides it’s time to go…]

While AI will usually give the Confederation at least a few years of their time, players are quite free to strike off on their own whenever. Albeit… for a higher Prestige cost during the first couple years.

The AI weighting for this Decision is heavily dependent on circumstances. Chief among these is the presence of big nearby threats that necessitate confederation. The result is that, where confederations are needed, they should prove much more lasting and resilient. And when they are no longer needed, they should often quickly disband.

image-24.png

[BROTRAYAL]

And there it is, Confederations! I hope this run-through has cleared up the feature. And remember — the CK player who stands alone, dies alone. Call up a friend right now and ask if they’d FUCKING DIE for you. Post results in the comments.

Raid Intents

We discussed raid intents in the previous dev diary, with a small WIP screenshot. It’s time to expand on what we said then.

First of all, we should talk about loot. As you all know, we’ve had loot in the game for quite a while. Gold you can take from a settlement as you raid them as a tribal ruler or a pagan, which you then bring back home to turn into gold and prestige. We haven’t changed the core mechanic of loot, but we have disconnected it slightly from purely being gold, now that you have more ways of using it. With Raid Intents, we now have ways of turning that loot into other things, to symbolize your aims as you are raiding foreign lands.

image-25.png


Here is the new raid intent screen (for nomads), after a small art pass and after we added some proper names. Now, let’s look at the default raid intent for nomadic rulers, Pillage.

image-26.png

[Note that none of the numbers are final, so they might change before the release]

It’s a fairly straightforward calculation. If you bring home 100 loot, you will get 100 gold and 150 herd out of it when you return to your borders.

Most of the other raid intents have some kind of separate side effects in addition to their base calculation, so let’s look at some of them.

image-27.png


Nomads were known for raiding far and wide, with the Hungarian raiders, for example, bringing home loot from all across Europe. With the Adventure raid intent, it will take a bit longer to raid each settlement, but you can carry a significantly larger amount of loot with you, and you will take no hostile county attrition.

It should be noted that within the steppe, nomad raiders will not take any hostile county attrition, regardless of raid intent, but they will regularly take attrition outside of it.

image-28.png


Plunder symbolizes that you aren’t necessarily just taking anything but trying to find the most valuable things to take. It will take significantly longer to raid every single settlement. Still, the loot conversion as you get home is considerably better, and you have a chance to learn innovations of a culture as you raid a settlement if they know about something you do not (though the chances are quite low).

image-29.png


For those less interested in the loot itself but rather other side effects, you might want to take the capture raid intent to significantly increase the chance of capturing someone as you raid a settlement. It’s great if you are looking to ransom someone.

image-30.png


And last but not least, you have the opportunity to destroy. It’s an opportunity for nomads to increase their prestige (as they don’t get any prestige from other raid intents) and their dread (which is more important for nomads). It also destroys buildings and development in settlements they raid.

Now, one thing to mention is that we don’t only have raid intents for nomads but for other raiders as well. Regular raiders also have access to the Terrorize raid intent, so feel free to bring destruction to your enemies no matter which flavor of uncivilized you are. They also have access to Pillage, but in a slightly different form:

image-31.png


Like current functionality, you simply change your loot to gold and prestige. And for Vikings, they have access to a slightly modified version of the Adventure intent.

image-32.png


If you want to raid your way down to Constantinople and then home again, feel free to take this to bring all that loot back home.

Now for the other side, you can destroy the raiders as they enter your lands, but we have also made one small adjustment so you can protect yourself a bit against any incoming threat.

image-33.png


We have increased the hostile raid time reduction in the building, so you have more time to respond to incoming threats. It now also reduces the chances of special raid intents. In other words, it reduces the improvements from the Capture raid intent, minimizes the chance of Terrorize ruining your lands, and for Plunder to find any innovation.

Upgrading the building will improve the effect and block raid intent special effects from happening outright. In other words, something to keep in mind if you experience a lot of raids in your lands.

Next Week

That’s it for this week. Next week, we plan to revisit migrations and the nomadic government, so we hope to see you again then. Go forth and conquer, my blood brothers.
 
  • 142Like
  • 75Love
  • 7
  • 5
  • 3
  • 2Haha
Reactions:
A couple questions/concerns:

It seems that making the color and name of a tributary may make it difficult to discern both how much of your territory is tributaries relative to actual vassals and difficult to for other players to discern what parts of your realm are potentially more vulnerable to falling away since they are mere tributaries. Is this information not important to the player due to the way tributaries function? Would it perhaps make more sense to stripe the territory color or something so that it becomes clearer?

If I understand correctly, Vikings have not received the capture raid intent. If so, this is very disappointing. Much of the gold gain from raiding is probably made from ransoming prisoners and I am often targeting specific territories in the hopes of capturing the women with good congenital traits who live there to serve as concubines. Not to mention the drive for women and slaves that historians seem to believe fueled the Viking raids.
It`s not a warcrime if warcrimes have not been invented yet XD
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
It'd be nice if feudal realms could also form confederations under certain conditions, like the historic Swiss Confederation in 1241. Maybe lock it behind some innovation? It might make sense to tie that with some tradition granting pike men-at-arms (Pike Square), which the Swiss also currently can't get, even though they famously had them historically.
 
  • 4
  • 1Like
Reactions:
It's a bit of a game balance thing: we don't want small or only loosely held together realms to start dominating their neighbors for tribute. Crown / Tribal Authority seemed like a pretty good approximation for the thing you'd need in order to qualify as a suzerain and it plays well. But the system is quite flexible, if you have some other suggestions for what the qualifications could be that feels more fitting and immersive, let us know!

As I see it, the fact that tributaries of non-nomadic realms automatically expire on ruler death should be enough to keep things from getting out of hand, but, if you think there needs to be further limitations, then perhaps, rather than low crown authority outright forbidding tributaries, it could instead allow the tributaries to voluntarily end the relationship whenever they feel it to be no longer beneficial.
 
It'd be nice if feudal realms could also form confederations under certain conditions, like the historic Swiss Confederation in 1241. Maybe lock it behind some innovation? It might make sense to tie that with some tradition granting pike men-at-arms (Pike Square), which the Swiss also currently can't get, even though they famously had them historically.
Wouldn't the Swiss Confederation members be considered republics rather than feudal? I bet there will be a league mechanic for republics whenever the eventual dlc comes out that makes them playable.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions:
Considering that there is now some fertility outside of the steep, a settled ruler should be able to give land to a nomad or allow them to graze in their territory and in exchange they become either allies or a subject, making them join wars on the side of their "liege", like the cummans with hungry.
 
  • 2Love
Reactions:
Wouldn't the Swiss Confederation members be considered republics rather than feudal? I bet there will be a league mechanic for republics whenever the eventual dlc comes out that makes them playable.
It was both, IIRC, and even abbeys and the like. Hence the idea of tying it to a (cultural? regional?) innovation.
 
Last edited:
Regarding the Plunder raid intent, do we get to capture all innovations? Like Cultural and Regional ones such as Longboats and Wootz Steel? Can we also get advanced innovations beyond our culture's era since tribals (and I assume Nomads would as well) are barred from advancing era
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
Here's some historical confederations:
Pecheneg-Bashkir confederation in 867
1742401558574.png

I think a cool mechanic would be a raid casus belli that depletes the fertility of the target area. Another cool mechanic to follow up this is spawning adventurers who take a part of the herd to wander elsewhere in search of new land without spawning in herders. This way the Pecheneg migration to the west could be simulated like thus:

The Khazars and Oghuz Yabgu begin a war against the Pechenegs around 892. If they win, the Pecheneg fertility will plummet, and two migratory bands will spawn. One of them will attack the Magyars, and the other will go settle among the Khazars.
If the Magyars lose the war against the Pecheneg migratory band, they will attack the Bulgarians for Pannonia. The Pechenegs will take over Yedisan. If the Magyars win, there will be no migration to the west.

The Khazar Pechenegs request land on the Dnieper, and will become Khazar tributaries in doing so. The Khazar vassal there will be angered by this, and the area will flip to Pecheneg. If the Khazars refuse, the Pechenegs will declare a war on them. This is the territory the Pechenegs will demand.
1742402047593.png


Here's the areas of the Kimek confederation in 867. This simply shows the cultures, the areas should be split up a lot, those being Kipchak, Kimek and Laktan. I think some sort of cascading effect happening around the 1030s where Kipchaks migrate en masse into the Pontic Steppe would be appreciated, and I hope it happens dynamically anyways.
1742402585415.png


Here's the Cuman-Kipchaks in 1066.
1742403071681.png

The Kimeks should remain in the Irtysh region as it has only been about 30 years since they lost the primacy in the confederation. Cumans can form as a hybrid between Kipchaks and Oghuz. Perhaps there should be a Qangli culture on the Syr darya too to represent a more urbanized Kipchak population there. The Qangli would become very important in the next century after all.

Here's 1178
1742403428597.png

The Kimeks were apparently absorbed (or maybe were the ancestors of) the Qangli as Qangli are mention to neighbor the Naimans on the Irtysh. There doesn't seem to be that many references to the Kimeks from the 12th century anyways that aren't obviously discussing an earlier time period. The areas outlined in green are under the Khwarezmians and the county outlined by magenta is under the Kara Khitai. Perhaps more counties should be added to accommodate the Qangli here, but alas.

All of these confederations make me wish for some laws that enable leaders and offensive war declaration too. It would be neat to not only have confederations as a defensive pact but also and offensive one. I think migratory bands should remain part of the confederation if they settle close enough to the old one, or they should rejoin that confederation if possible with high acceptance.
 
  • 9
  • 1
Reactions:
Change the county setup to allow for the forest-steppe variant of Saltovo-Mayaki culture. The people here were Alans who survived up until the Mongol era around Kharkiv.

The active formation of a common culture for all variants is in no way a reason to deny the fact that the northernmost of them, the forest-steppe variant, is noticeably different from the others. Perhaps I. I. Lyapushkin is right, explaining this primarily by anthropological differences: most people who lived in forest-steppe settlements and buried their dead in the burial grounds located next to them were dolichocranic. Their anthropological, and therefore ethnic, proximity to the Alans of the Ciscaucasia determined the similarity of the culture of this variant with the Alan culture. The Alans who came to the Don basin from the foothills settled on lands that were close to them in physical and geographical features: the high chalk spurs of the right bank of the rivers served them for the construction of fortified settlements, spacious and flat, often with a slightly sloping surface, dry areas were used for the placement of settlements and burial grounds. The Alans brought with them an economic way of life (sedentary, agricultural), certain skills in house-building, weapons, ceramics and many other things, and most importantly, the ability to make them, i.e. handicraft production: ceramics, blacksmithing, jewelry.

There are several hypotheses about the reasons for the penetration of the Alans into the Don basin.

The first is that the Alans retreated to the Don forest-steppe under pressure from the Khazars in the 7th century (Lyapushkin, 1958), the second is that they left the Ciscaucasia regions devastated by Arab troops in the middle of the 8th century (Pletneva, 1967, p. 91), and the third is that the Alans were forcibly resettled in the second half of the 8th century by the Khazar government to the northern outskirts of the Khaganate, since at that time they were in vassal dependence on the rulers of Khazaria (Gadlo, 1979, p. 193; Mikheev, 1985, p. 97).

The Alans occupied vast lands of the Don forest-steppe (see Fig. 4). In this territory, at the end of the 1960s, 75 monuments were known: hillforts, settlements, burial grounds (Pletneva, 1967, pp. 191-194, Fig. 5). At present, their number has doubled (Afanasyev, 1987, pp. 168-184). The list published by G.E. Afanasyev in 1987 indicates 277 numbers, which means that the number of monuments has increased not twofold, but more than threefold. But it should be taken into account that the author slightly changed the numbering system. Afanasyev gave separate numbers to all the objects that, according to Pletneva, constituted single "nests" and therefore received one common number. Thus, the 1967 list grew by 28 monuments. In addition, newly discovered monuments, which were included in both previously allocated and new "nests", also received their numbers. Such an accounting of monuments, adopted by the compilers of the Codes, is certainly more legitimate. It should be noted that on Oskol, where the teacher of the Volokonovskaya school A.G. Nikolaenko conducted extremely energetic explorations for many seasons, the number of monuments has actually tripled compared to 1967.
1742406444289.png

 
Last edited:
  • 2
Reactions:
1742406802241.png

The Khazar capital Itil should be located here. It would later become Saqsin, a trade hub consisting of various small emirates. Saqsin was predominantly Muslim Oghuz.
 
Do I understand correctly that the nomads will not have cities?
If so, then this is a bit silly, the nomads always had cities, these cities served as control centers and trading points, the khans mostly sat in cities, the only thing is that the nomad cities were more often destroyed by other nomads.
You can add cities, at least historical one, or allow them to be founded, as feudal lords can.
 
  • 1Love
Reactions:
I imagine in the 867 startdate, Ivor the Boneless is going to push a lot of Irish tribes into a confederation anyway.

But there should be confederations and tributary relationships there already. Airgialla should be in a tributary relationship with Aed Findliath as its suzerain. One could change Aed from Duke of Meath to Duke of Ulster(more accurately 'The North' or 'In Tuaiscert' or 'In Fochla') in confederation with Flann Sinna as Petty King of Meath.

Similarly the Eoghanacht provinces of Munster should also be in a confederation, with Ormond as the leading member. A Dal gCais dynasty member should read be in Ennis and remain aloof from this arrangement.
Yes! But feudal Ireland should retain confederations too I think. And that's where I think a special high kingship mechanic could come into play.