-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
It might help if you, instead of sulk, once again make your case against AOK in one coherent post.
That doesn't involve what Thistletooth might or might not have done.
Oh, no. The last time I agreed with Jonti the village lost in a terribly humiliating way. Let's hope this time is different.
So it is no longer ok to see that AoK did a noob mistake and look at other, similar cases, where the same thing happened?
You *think* he made a noob mistake. The question would be whether AOK would be stupid enough to do it. The answer is clearly no.
The only way this "evidence" would be remotely useful would be as extra circumstantial evidence to back up some stronger stuff. As a main plank for a case, it is as much use as a chocolate fireguard.
And so it was said in the TT case too. Still, he proved out to be a wolf. It is also interesting that AoK did refuse to answer Skarion's questions.
I think you have come to a conclusion and are looking for evidence to support that thought process, instead of the other way around. It is very easy to do, especially when talking about AOK. The way he plays and acts it is very hard to see him as an innocent villager.
I do not want to see AOK lynched while the Seer is still alive; once the Seer is dead I may be the first to make the case against him, but not now.
EDIT-Outside of some ridiculously obvious case against him, that hasn't happened yet.
I don't agree there is a case but I don't think it's a strong one.
If the seer haven't scanned him yet he's a a moron or b inactive.
So we can only guess but who knows maybe he's in the JL already maybe not.
I find it weird that people somehow vote on tulp today while nobody even listened to me yesterday remarkable.
from Heíms post:
Me thinks the chance that all wolfs are part of the tie are low.
EURO was voting on teep.
We know lala and HC ware villagers so that leaves us jonti, MrG and HJ.
I don't know about jonti, but MrG did react weird when people pointed out he was inactive and Tulp, well tulp did nearly save EURO in the end
vote Tulp
Things change every day, actually even more often than that sometimes. No one denied that Tulp was a decent target, just not he best yesterday. That very well may have changed today.
Things change every day, actually even more often than that sometimes. No one denied that Tulp was a decent target, just not he best yesterday. That very well may have changed today.
Yes still I find it remarkable.
edit:
when the village starts to listen to me it means I'm either being set up or played by the wolfs
Do you really think that I would try to safe a packmate on the first day? I would only have done so if it was SURE I could safe a packmate. If I was wolf I'd just have voted Euro in the end.I don't agree there is a case but I don't think it's a strong one.
If the seer haven't scanned him yet he's a a moron or b inactive.
So we can only guess but who knows maybe he's in the JL already maybe not.
I find it weird that people somehow vote on tulp today while nobody even listened to me yesterday remarkable.
from Heíms post:
Me thinks the chance that all wolfs are part of the tie are low.
EURO was voting on teep.
We know lala and HC ware villagers so that leaves us jonti, MrG and HJ.
I don't know about jonti, but MrG did react weird when people pointed out he was inactive and Tulp, well tulp did nearly save EURO in the end
vote Tulp
Without the Skarion re-snipe you would have. You also have AOK's "orders" to fall back on. You weren't saving a packmate you were doing what AOK said, right?
This feels like a bad comedy routine.
Specifically what questions about the PM matter did AOK not answer?