Hello,
I will try and replicate the problem in a few days. The issue is that when a trade is under-funded then the resource is still lost by the country that can afford the trade (when both are controlled by the AI, but it might be the same for humans too), but the recipient who does not have the money to pay for it neither loses the money nor recieves the resource. (I.e. Germany trades 90 energy for $6 with Italy daily - even if Italy cannot afford that $6, Germany would still lose that 90 energy, but Italy would not gain it and it would not lose $6).
I will try and replicate the problem in a few days. The issue is that when a trade is under-funded then the resource is still lost by the country that can afford the trade (when both are controlled by the AI, but it might be the same for humans too), but the recipient who does not have the money to pay for it neither loses the money nor recieves the resource. (I.e. Germany trades 90 energy for $6 with Italy daily - even if Italy cannot afford that $6, Germany would still lose that 90 energy, but Italy would not gain it and it would not lose $6).
Upvote
0