Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

1.56 BUG LIST-Please Help Make The AGCEEP Better

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
unmerged(40707)

unmerged(40707)

Just call me Yoda in private!
Mar 1, 2005
20.187
5
Report all bugs/typos/broken events etc here. Do not make general suggestions, that should be done in the appropriate thread on the topic. Technical support issues should not be posted here, but go into that thread.

We do not help out with issues connected to MyMap or other mods based on AGCEEP, please use their threads.
 
PLEASE HELP OUT WITH THINGS HERE:

..or tell us if something is obsolete and should be removed from the list.

Remove from the list in RED.
Solved problem in GREEN, with link.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Bugs to Fix List:

Incoherencies in 1.56 events

Empty monarchs files:
monarchs.anh
monarchs.arm
monarchs.naf

Events with commands for non existing leaders:
328056 in AGCEEP_Specific_Vijayanagar.eue awakes 133001 - commented out

Dormant and never awakened monarchs:
'Mehmed Bey Bushati *' (Id = 03015) in monarchs.alb
'Kara Mahmud *' (Id = 03016) in monarchs.alb
'Ibrahim Pasha *' (Id = 03017) in monarchs.alb
'Mustafa *' (Id = 03018) in monarchs.alb
'Davit X.' (Id = 018003) in monarchs.bae
'Charles, Dauphin de France' (Id = 027016) in monarchs.bur
'Ismail Adil Shah' (Id = 041502) in monarchs.dam
'Paullu' (Id = 063015) in monarchs.inc
'Sayri-Tupac' (Id = 063016) in monarchs.inc
'Titu Cusi' (Id = 063017) in monarchs.inc
'Tupac-Amaru' (Id = 063018) in monarchs.inc
'Qara Iskandar' (Id = 0114002) in monarchs.qar
'Abu Sa'id' (Id = 0114003) in monarchs.qar
'Karl Knutsson Bonde' (Id = 0131508) in monarchs.swe

Dormant and never awakened leaders:
'Hou Xian' (Id = 032303) in leaders.chi
'Yongle' (Id = 032304) in leaders.chi
'Xuan Zong' (Id = 032305) in leaders.chi
'Henri de Guise' (Id = 049821) in leaders.fra
'Sri Vijay Singh' (Id = 065306) in leaders.jai
'Miklos Zrinyi II' (Id = 0124308) in leaders.sie
'Ferenc Nadasdy' (Id = 0124309) in leaders.sie
'Andras Hadik' (Id = 0124310) in leaders.sie


Don't know what to do (bugs 1.51):
bug #142 - http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showpost.php?p=6456184&postcount=142
bug #149 - http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showpost.php?p=6466061&postcount=149


Bugs in 1.42:
http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showpost.php?p=6775610&postcount=68


Some remaining questions here:
http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showpost.php?p=5444552&postcount=75


Bugs that are in the process of getting fixed:
-Setup and events for Butung are all messed up.


Dormant and never awakened monarchs/leaders (future use):
'T. de Luna y Arellano' (Id = 010826) in leaders.arg
'Gabriel Bosque' (Id = 010827) in leaders.arg
'Cristóbal de Olid' (Id = 010828) in leaders.arg
'Miguel Díaz de Aux' (Id = 010829) in leaders.arg
'Alfons Moreno Díaz' (Id = 010830) in leaders.arg
'Zhi Chen Hao' (Id = 032040) in monarchs.chi
'Zhi Zhi Pan' (Id = 032041) in monarchs.chi
'Sigurd III Jonsson *' (Id = 098519) in monarchs.nor
'Hans I *' (Id = 098520) in monarchs.nor
'Li Jin' (Id = 0146002) in monarchs.u11
'Zhang Ke Wang' (Id = 0146501) in monarchs.u12
'Zhang Zheng Qi' (Id = 0146502) in monarchs.u12
'Zhang Zheng Chun' (Id = 0146503) in monarchs.u12
'Zhang Zheng Hao' (Id = 0146504) in monarchs.u12
'Zhang Ding Guo' (Id = 0146505) in monarchs.u12
'Zhang Si Xing' (Id = 0146506) in monarchs.u12
'Zhang Si Xing descendants' (Id = 0146508) in monarchs.u12
'Wu Ying Xiong' (Id = 0147001) in monarchs.u13
'Wu Shi Lin' (Id = 0147002) in monarchs.u13
'Nuno Tristão' (Id = 0110827) in leaders.por
'A. Gonçalves Baldaia' (Id = 0110833) in leaders.por
'Antão Gonçalves' (Id = 0110837) in leaders.por
'Gonçalo Velho' (Id = 0110845) in leaders.por
'R. Lourenço Ravasco' (Id = 0110829) in leaders.por
'John Plantagenet (Henry VI)' (Id = 046036) in monarchs.eng
'Humphrey Plantagenet (Henry VI)' (Id = 046037) in monarchs.eng
'Henry Beaufort (Henry VI)' (Id = 046007) in monarchs.eng
 
Last edited:
According to maps with ids for oceans here (posts 8 to 10):

Continent for sea zones 1031, 1032, 1079, 1212 and 1219 should be Oceania
Continent for sea zone 1321 should be Asia
Continent for sea zone 1360 should be Africa
Continent for sea zones 1367 and 1375 to 1378 should be America
 
Not really a bug but name of GEL country in text.csv is Gelderland but specific events file is AGCEEP_Specific_Geldre.eue.

Should'nt events file be renamed according to text.csv?
 
YodaMaster said:
According to maps with ids for oceans here (posts 8 to 10):

Continent for sea zones 1031, 1032, 1079, 1212 and 1219 should be Oceania
Continent for sea zone 1321 should be Asia
Continent for sea zone 1360 should be Africa
Continent for sea zones 1367 and 1375 to 1378 should be America
Click to expand...

Can I ask why we would do that? Wouldn't it make more sense to move those seazones to the appropriate seas? Also, Seas can be in multiple continents, so why should 1031,1032, etc. move to continents that are further away?
 
Check highlighted sea zones on the maps (or missing coloured dot in first one) in the link and province.csv. You will see current sea (region) is right for all mentioned provinces but continent and only continent is wrong.

For example, sea zone 1031 is in EPacificSea region but continent is... Europe.


Current region and continent for sea zones:
Pacific Countercurrent (1031): EPacificSea - Europe
Irrawady delta (1079): NEIndianSea - Asia
North West Cape (1212): SEIndianSea - Asia
Straits of Torres (1219): OceaniaSea - Asia
Ocean (1321): NWPacificSea - Oceania
Coast of Transkei (1360): SWIndianSea - Oceania
Southern Atlantic Ocean (1367): SWAtlanticSea - Africa

etc...
 
Last edited:
YodaMaster said:
Check the maps in the link and province.csv. You will see current sea (region) is right for all mentioned provinces but continent and only continent is wrong.

For example, seazone 1031 is in EPacificSea region but continent is... Europe.
Click to expand...

Ah, I see what you're saying. Makes sense.

Oh that reminds, which I need to bring up, but Spain isn't actually told to explore any of the seas on the way to the Philippines.
 
Garbon said:
Oh that reminds, which I need to bring up, but Spain isn't actually told to explore any of the seas on the way to the Philippines.
Click to expand...
Intended. This is why we modified region of all sea zones around Philippines (1151, 1152, 1153 and 1352) and moved them to West Pacific Sea... and it works. Spain always colonize Philippines now, but not always in time.
 
Last edited:
Garbon said:
Also, is there a reason that Spain is never directed to explore SWAtlantic or SEPacific, even its later AI files?
Click to expand...
No idea.

Garbon said:
It's worked in none of mine. :D
Click to expand...
It makes 50% then, if we made the same amount of tests but "none of mine" is not a plural... ;)
 
YodaMaster said:
No idea.
Click to expand...

Interesting.

YodaMaster said:
It makes 50% then, if we made the same amount of tests
Click to expand...
:p

YodaMaster said:
but "none of mine" is not a plural... ;)
Click to expand...

In this case, the possessive pronoun mine stands in place of my tests. ;)
 
Garbon said:
In this case, the possessive pronoun mine stands in place of my tests. ;)
Click to expand...
Ok, I wasn't sure... :eek:o

But I am still surprised it doesn't work at all in your tests.

About "missing" regions for Spain, they have no influence on colonization right? But they could be added to late 1700 file. 1586 one could/should be useful for Philippines... re-:eek:o
 
YodaMaster said:
About "missing" regions for Spain, they have no influence on colonization right? But they could be added to late 1700 file. 1586 one could/should be useful for Philippines... re-:eek:o
Click to expand...

Well when I added them earlier, to provide an alternate route to the Philippines (didn't work by the way), it led to more colonization of southern South America. That seems about right for 18th century and forwards.
 
My current test, date is 1627:

philippineser5.png


Not really a failure, isn't it?

But Luzon with grain is not really appealing for greedy Spain...
 
In my 5 previous tests:
1660-1680
1700-1720
1620-1640
1580-1600
1580-1600

But islands are always discovered before. Only problem is Spain is too busy colonising elsewhere or involved in wars (and thus not sending troops to Philippines in order to "secure" provinces).
 
How bizarre (with regards to me always missing out on seeing them colonized). At any rate, anything attempts past 1660 should be counted as failures...considering that Spain should historically be making inroads around 1560.

It's sort of the same on the Dutch bit that I'm trying to work on. The Netherlands should be in Indonesia at the start of the 17th century. The end of the century is much too late.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back