Mats_SX said:
My guess is it shows up for the natives in provinces with TP, like Senegambian in west Africa for example.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
My guess is it shows up for the natives in provinces with TP, like Senegambian in west Africa for example.
Missing religion change for 1520 scenario:
Instruction to be removed for 1648 (1520 setup will apply in 1648 because of scenarios structure).
Code:
province = { id = 1590 religion = sunni } #BaleProblem is in "Kingdom of Germany" Option:beregic said:
Code:
#(1525-1540) The Fate of the Teutonic Order
#by Raudex-EEP - modified by SorelusImperion
event = {
id = 366814
trigger = {
NOT = { exists = PRU }
exists = POL
atwar = no
NOT = { event = 366807 } #POL: The peace of Königsberg
[COLOR=Yellow]NOT = {
event = 209012 #LAT: #The Fate of the Teutonic Order
}[/COLOR]
}
random = no
country = LAT
name = "EVENTNAME209012" #The Fate of the Teutonic Order
desc = "EVENTHIST209012"
#-#
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1525 }
offset = 60
deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1540 }
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAME209012A" #Become the Duchy of Prussia
command = { type = independence which = BRA } #Brandenburg
command = { type = independence which = MIN } #Masovia
command = { type = independence which = LIV } #Livonian Order
command = { type = religion which = protestant }
command = { type = secedeprovince which = POL value = 301 } #Danzig
command = { type = secedeprovince which = POL value = 303 } #Poznan
command = { type = secedeprovince which = POL value = 300 } #Wielkopolska
command = { type = secedeprovince which = POL value = 292 } #Podlasia
#In 1.08 changing religion doesn't break vassalage
command = { type = breakvassal which = DAN }
command = { type = breakvassal which = SWE }
command = { type = breakvassal which = LIT }
command = { type = breakvassal which = MIN }
command = { type = breakvassal which = LIV }
command = { type = breakvassal which = BRA }
command = { type = treasury value = 500 }
command = { type = stability value = 6 }
command = { type = flagname which = "" }
command = { type = country which = PRU }
[COLOR=Yellow]command = { type = sleepevent which = 338109 } #ProvinceSpec*290: The Lands of Teutonic Order
command = { type = sleepevent which = 258230 } #POL: The Lands of Teutonic Order
command = { type = sleepevent which = 381001 } #LIV: Secularization of Prussia -I-
command = { type = sleepevent which = 209012 } #LAT: The Fate of the Teutonic Order
command = { type = trigger which = 381003 } #LIV: Secularization of Prussia -II-
}
action_b = {
name = "ACTIONNAME209012B" #Continue as the Order
command = { type = stability value = -3 }
command = { type = treasury value = -100 }
command = { type = religion which = catholic }
command = { type = domestic which = ARISTOCRACY value = 1 }
command = { type = domestic which = INNOVATIVE value = -1 }
command = { type = domestic which = SERFDOM value = 1 }
command = { type = domestic which = LAND value = 2 }
command = { type = domestic which = QUALITY value = 2 } #To balance things a bit
command = { type = sleepevent which = 381001 } #LIV: Secularization of Prussia -I-
command = { type = sleepevent which = 209012 } #LAT: The Fate of the Teutonic Order
}[/COLOR]
}Spelling and grammar corrections for description of FRA_170088:
#-#After the assassination of Concini, Louis XIII gave the power to the one who helped him at the time, Charles of Albert, Duke of Luynes. Appointed constable by the King, he cumulated the powers and the honors despite the bad decisions he took in royal council, which displeased quickly the great lords of the Kingdom. The lords approached the Queen-mother, Marie de' Medici, confined in Blois. She was rescued from it by the Duke of Epernon on February 22, 1619. In 1620, Marie de' Medici led the revolt of the lords against the King, especially the dukes of Vendome (half-brothers of the King), the duke of Montmorency and the Duke of Rohan. The rebel forces met the royal armies led by Louis XIII himself at Ponts-de-Cé on August 7, 1620, where they were fully destroyed. With the advice of the bishop of Luçon (Richelieu) and from fear of seeing his mother continuing to plot, the King accepted his return to the court of France. Ten years later, Marie de' Médici will try once again to take the power back to Richelieu at the time of the Day of Dupes, but she will fail and be exiled.
#-#After the assassination of Concini, Louis XIII gave the power to the one who helped him at the time, Charles of Albert, Duke of Luynes. Appointed constable by the King, he cumulated the powers and the honors despite the bad decisions he took in royal council, which displeased quickly the great lords of the Kingdom. The lords approached the Queen-mother, Marie de' Medici, confined in Blois. She was rescued from it by the Duke of Epernon on February 22, 1619. In 1620, Marie de' Medici led the revolt of the lords against the King, especially the dukes of Vendome (half-brothers of the King), the duke of Montmorency and the Duke of Rohan. The rebel forces met the royal armies led by Louis XIII himself at Ponts-de-Cé on August 7, 1620, where they were fully destroyed. With the advice of the bishop of Luçon (Richelieu) and from fear of seeing his mother continuing to plot, the King accepted his return to the court of France. Ten years later, Marie de' Médici will try once again to take the power back to Richelieu at the time of the Day of Dupes, but she will fail and be exiled.
Spelling and grammar corrections for description of FRA_170089:
#-#The Prime Minister of Louis XIII, Richelieu, was a man hated by the nobility because he reduced the privileges of this nobility. He particularly forbid the duels, favored the local middle-class or the recently established nobility of the merchants, and destroyed several fortresses owned by the Greats. In 1626, Louis XIII wished that his brother, Gaston, then heir of the Kingdom, marries one of the most beautiful matches of France, Marie de Bourbon, princess of Montpensier. The purpose of this marriage was to control the order of succession as Louis didn't have a direct heir. This marriage had been thought of by Richelieu. Thus, various interests of the nobles and all the hatreds against Richelieu gathered around Gaston, so a party 'of the aversion to the marriage' was born. The duchess of Chevreuse, the Queen, Marie de' Médici and the half-brothers of the King, the princes de Vendôme, pressed Gaston to leave the court and rebel against the King. The lover of the duchess of Chevreuse, the count de Chalais was supposed to assassinate Richelieu by claiming a quarrel. Because of internal dissensions, the plot was quickly discovered. The King and Richelieu immediately reacted and arrested the conspirators. The princes de Vendôme were imprisoned, the duchess of Chevreuse exiled in Lorraine, and Gaston had to yield to the will of the King and marry Marie de Bourbon nevertheless, gaining the duchy of Orleans. Only the count de Chalais was executed by decapitation, because he was the only participant not to belong to the royal family or to its entourage. Although not very serious, this conspiracy showed the increasing opposition of the nobles to the policy of Richelieu.
#-#The Prime Minister of Louis XIII, Richelieu, was a man hated by the nobility because he reduced the privileges of this nobility. He particularly forbid the duels, favored the local middle-class or the recently established nobility of the merchants, and destroyed several fortresses owned by the Greats. In 1626, Louis XIII wished that his brother, Gaston, then heir of the Kingdom, marries one of the most beautiful matches of France, Marie de Bourbon, princess of Montpensier. The purpose of this marriage was to control the order of succession as Louis didn't have a direct heir. This marriage had been thought of by Richelieu. Thus, various interests of the nobles and all the hatreds against Richelieu gathered around Gaston, so a party 'of the aversion to the marriage' was born. The duchess of Chevreuse, the Queen, Marie de' Médici and the half-brothers of the King, the princes de Vendôme, pressed Gaston to leave the court and rebel against the King. The lover of the duchess of Chevreuse, the count de Chalais was supposed to assassinate Richelieu by claiming a quarrel. Because of internal dissensions, the plot was quickly discovered. The King and Richelieu immediately reacted and arrested the conspirators. The princes de Vendôme were imprisoned, the duchess of Chevreuse exiled in Lorraine, and Gaston had to yield to the will of the King and marry Marie de Bourbon nevertheless, gaining the duchy of Orleans. Only the count de Chalais was executed by decapitation, because he was the only participant not to belong to the royal family or to its entourage. Although not very serious, this conspiracy showed the increasing opposition of the nobles to the policy of Richelieu.
Spelling and grammar corrections for description of FRA_170091:
#-#Of all the revolts which regularly disturbed the ministry of the cardinal of Richelieu, that of the count de Soissons was probably the most dangerous because its failure was only due to the hazard of the war. This plot was supported by the duke of Bouillon, a great leader and prince of Sedan, by money and troops from the King of Spain and by Gaston of Orléans, the brother of the King. The duke of Bouillon and the count de Soissons raised troops and accepted the support of Spain, then invaded France. The plan of the conspirators envisaged to assassinate the cardinal and to incite the rebellion among the people of Paris. As soon as the Spanish army joined the forces of the conspirators, they engaged the troops of the King in battle near the Marfée. They gained a complete victory, crushing the royal army, but the death of the count of Soissons, killed in the battle by a shot in the head, made the victory useless to the ones who were dissatisfied. We don't truly know how the count of Soissons died, if he was killed by a sniper or if, more probably, he died of his own blunder, having the bad habits to raise his visor with the barrel of his gun. The duke of Bouillon submitted himself soon after to the King and kept the town of Sedan. He took part, a few months later, to another conspiracy and lost, definitively this time, the town of Sedan.
#-#Of all the revolts which regularly disturbed the ministry of the cardinal of Richelieu, that of the count de Soissons was probably the most dangerous because its failure was only due to the hazard of the war. This plot was supported by the duke of Bouillon, a great leader and prince of Sedan, by money and troops from the King of Spain and by Gaston of Orléans, the brother of the King. The duke of Bouillon and the count de Soissons raised troops and accepted the support of Spain, then invaded France. The plan of the conspirators envisaged to assassinate the cardinal and to incite the rebellion among the people of Paris. As soon as the Spanish army joined the forces of the conspirators, they engaged the troops of the King in battle near the Marfée. They gained a complete victory, crushing the royal army, but the death of the count of Soissons, killed in the battle by a shot in the head, made the victory useless to the ones who were dissatisfied. We don't truly know how the count of Soissons died, if he was killed by a sniper or if, more probably, he died of his own blunder, having the bad habits to raise his visor with the barrel of his gun. The duke of Bouillon submitted himself soon after to the King and kept the town of Sedan. He took part, a few months later, to another conspiracy and lost, definitively this time, the town of Sedan.
Spelling and grammar corrections for description of FRA_170092:
#-#The marquis of Cinq-Mars quickly became the King's favorite thanks to the support of Richelieu and, although from modest nobility, accepted the rank of great equerry for which he was called 'Monsieur le Grand'. His influence on the King was great, almost as much as Richelieu's. He hoped to reinforce his position at the court by marrying the richest heiress of the time, Marie of Gonzague, but her being adverse an opponent of Richelieu, the cardinal vetoed such an alliance. The marquis of Cinq-Mars was extremely heinous against Richelieu. He was then approached by several important nobles who couldn't bear any more Richelieu gradually depriving them of their rights and privileges. Thus a conspiracy was born with purpose of getting of Richelieu and joined together the duke of Orleans (the brother of the King), the Queen, Anne Austria, the marquis of Frontailles and the duke of Bouillon. They requested the help of Spain in war with France since 1635 and signed a treaty where Philippe IV provided the conspirators with 120.00 infantrymen, 6.000 cavalry and 400.000 ecus in exchange for a peace treaty where each one returned the conquered cities and where France gave its Swedish and German alliances up. The conspirators even envisaged to assassinate Richelieu. Nobody knows with certainty who betrayed the conspirators, but it was probably the Queen, Anne of Austria, who sought to protect her son, the future Louis XIV. On 12 June, informed of this plot, Richelieu warned the King who gave the order to arrest the traitors. Cinq-Mars was arrested as well as the brother of the King, the marquis of Frontailles fled abroad while the duke of Bouillon, trying to escape, was found in a barn full of hay. The duke of Bouilon and Gaston, the brother of the King, managed in clearing themselves but not Cinq-Mars who ended up on the scaffold on September 12, 1642. Richelieu had once again succeeded in overcoming his opponents but had alienated the remainder of the nobility even more.
#-#The marquis of Cinq-Mars quickly became the King's favorite thanks to the support of Richelieu and, although from modest nobility, accepted the rank of great equerry for which he was called 'Monsieur le Grand'. His influence on the King was great, almost as much as Richelieu's. He hoped to reinforce his position at the court by marrying the richest heiress of the time, Marie of Gonzague, but her being adverse an opponent of Richelieu, the cardinal vetoed such an alliance. The marquis of Cinq-Mars was extremely heinous against Richelieu. He was then approached by several important nobles who couldn't bear any more Richelieu gradually depriving them of their rights and privileges. Thus a conspiracy was born with purpose of getting of Richelieu and joined together the duke of Orleans (the brother of the King), the Queen, Anne Austria, the marquis of Frontailles and the duke of Bouillon. They requested the help of Spain in war with France since 1635 and signed a treaty where Philippe IV provided the conspirators with 120.00 infantrymen, 6.000 cavalry and 400.000 ecus in exchange for a peace treaty where each one returned the conquered cities and where France gave its Swedish and German alliances up. The conspirators even envisaged to assassinate Richelieu. Nobody knows with certainty who betrayed the conspirators, but it was probably the Queen, Anne of Austria, who sought to protect her son, the future Louis XIV. On 12 June, informed of this plot, Richelieu warned the King who gave the order to arrest the traitors. Cinq-Mars was arrested as well as the brother of the King, the marquis of Frontailles fled abroad while the duke of Bouillon, trying to escape, was found in a barn full of hay. The duke of Bouilon and Gaston, the brother of the King, managed in clearing themselves but not Cinq-Mars who ended up on the scaffold on September 12, 1642. Richelieu had once again succeeded in overcoming his opponents but had alienated the remainder of the nobility even more.
Spelling and grammar corrections for description of FRA_3114:
#-#Michel Le Tellier (1603-1685) was the son of a counselor at the Account Chamber. Pinpointed by Prime Minister Cardinal Mazarin, he was named Secretary of War in 1643. He started the needed reformation of the French army and war administration as minister till 1666 and Chancellor till 1677. His eldest son, Louvois, perfected his achievement and provided his master, Louis XIV, with the largest and best army of the second half of the 17th century.
#-#Michel Le Tellier (1603-1685) was the son of a counselor at the Account Chamber. Pinpointed by Prime Minister Cardinal Mazarin, he was named Secretary of War in 1643. He started the needed reformation of the French army and war administration as minister till 1666 and Chancellor till 1677. His eldest son, Louvois, perfected his achievement and provided his master, Louis XIV, with the largest and best army of the second half of the 17th century.
Spelling and grammar corrections for description of ETH_165013:
#-#In 1487 Joao II of Portugal ordered Bartolomeu Dias around Africa by sea, but he also ordered his trusted spymaster and diplomat, Pêro da Covilhã, to reach India and the Kingdom of Prester John by land. Pêro da Covilhã spoke fluent Arabic, and with a companion traveled to Mecca. From there he traveled alone to Goa and Calicut, learning about currents, winds and the origin of the different spices. He then returned to Cairo. From there he forwarded his information together with advice on the best sea-route to India to his King, before continuing to Aden, Ormuz, and Saylac, in the coast of Adal. He finally arrived at Ethiopia in 1490, being well received by Emperor Eskander. After four years of stay, he was preparing his departure, with a proposal of an alliance from the Emperor of Ethiopia to the King of Portugal, when Eskander died. He was succeeded by his brother Na'od, after the death of his son. Na'od informed Pêro da Covilhã that he would have to remain in Ethiopia for the rest of his life according to the custom of the Kingdom, but rewarded him lavishly and named him court advisor.
#-#In 1487 Joao II of Portugal ordered Bartolomeu Dias around Africa by sea, but he also ordered his trusted spymaster and diplomat, Pêro da Covilhã, to reach India and the Kingdom of Prester John by land. Pêro da Covilhã spoke fluent Arabic, and with a companion traveled to Mecca. From there he traveled alone to Goa and Calicut, learning about currents, winds and the origin of the different spices. He then returned to Cairo. From there he forwarded his information together with advice on the best sea-route to India to his King, before continuing to Aden, Ormuz, and Saylac, in the coast of Adal. He finally arrived at Ethiopia in 1490, being well received by Emperor Eskander. After four years of stay, he was preparing his departure, with a proposal of an alliance from the Emperor of Ethiopia to the King of Portugal, when Eskander died. He was succeeded by his brother Na'od, after the death of his son. Na'od informed Pêro da Covilhã that he would have to remain in Ethiopia for the rest of his life according to the custom of the Kingdom, but rewarded him lavishly and named him court advisor.
Spelling and grammar corrections for description of ETH_165016:
#-#It was too bad that Lebna Dengel had dismissed the Portuguese ambassadors in 1526, because the next year and without warning Adal had started a war like no other in the history of Ethiopia. Lead by a mysterious warrior, that the Ethiopians called Grañ (Left-handed), and his men called Ahmad al-Fath (the Conqueror), the armies of Adal had been trained in Ottoman tactics, and were armed with flintlock firearms. The Ethiopians were great warriors. Raised in the highlands, they are one of the strongest populations on earth, and their armies were 5 to 10 times superior in numbers. Yet the only thing that they could do against the modern armies of Adal was to make them pay a hefty price for their victories. So they suffered a great defeat at the Awash river in the battle of Shimbra Kure in 1529. Lebna Dengel had 16,000 cavalry and 200,000 infantry against Ahmad 560 cavalry and 12,000 soldiers. Although the Ethiopians were able to kill 5,000 soldiers of Adal, their loses were much higher. Afterwards Ahmad penetrated deep into the highlands, attacking Dawaro and Shewa in 1531, then Amhara, Lasta, Bale, Hadya, Sidama and the Gurage. With half of former Ethiopia under his control, in 1535 Ahmad invaded Tigray in the North, sacking the sacred city of Aksum and destroying the Cathedral were the emperors had been crowned for centuries. But the worst part was the damage inflicted to the people of Ethiopia and Adal by Ahmad, that would change their demography forever. To finance his military campaign against his bigger neighbour, Ahmad used a scorched earth tactic, laying waste to the land and selling every Ethiopian he could capture, Muslim or Christian, as a slave. No Christian priest or nun was left alive by him. Lebna Dengel, outmaneuvered and out-musketed, fled from one province to another, trying to organize the resistance. There was no possibility of a peace agreement, as Ahmad was bent on the destruction of the Christian country. His elder son, Fiqtor, was killed in battle, and the youngest, Menas, was captured and sent as a slave to the Ottoman overlord of Yemen. In desperation, Lebna Dengel sent a plee for help to the King of Portugal. In doing that, he saved his country, but he would not see the result, as he died on the run, exhausted and miserable in 1540.
#-#It was too bad that Lebna Dengel had dismissed the Portuguese ambassadors in 1526, because the next year and without warning Adal had started a war like no other in the history of Ethiopia. Lead by a mysterious warrior, that the Ethiopians called Grañ (Left-handed), and his men called Ahmad al-Fath (the Conqueror), the armies of Adal had been trained in Ottoman tactics, and were armed with flintlock firearms. The Ethiopians were great warriors. Raised in the highlands, they are one of the strongest populations on earth, and their armies were 5 to 10 times superior in numbers. Yet the only thing that they could do against the modern armies of Adal was to make them pay a hefty price for their victories. So they suffered a great defeat at the Awash river in the battle of Shimbra Kure in 1529. Lebna Dengel had 16,000 cavalry and 200,000 infantry against Ahmad 560 cavalry and 12,000 soldiers. Although the Ethiopians were able to kill 5,000 soldiers of Adal, their loses were much higher. Afterwards Ahmad penetrated deep into the highlands, attacking Dawaro and Shewa in 1531, then Amhara, Lasta, Bale, Hadya, Sidama and the Gurage. With half of former Ethiopia under his control, in 1535 Ahmad invaded Tigray in the North, sacking the sacred city of Aksum and destroying the Cathedral were the emperors had been crowned for centuries. But the worst part was the damage inflicted to the people of Ethiopia and Adal by Ahmad, that would change their demography forever. To finance his military campaign against his bigger neighbour, Ahmad used a scorched earth tactic, laying waste to the land and selling every Ethiopian he could capture, Muslim or Christian, as a slave. No Christian priest or nun was left alive by him. Lebna Dengel, outmaneuvered and out-musketed, fled from one province to another, trying to organize the resistance. There was no possibility of a peace agreement, as Ahmad was bent on the destruction of the Christian country. His elder son, Fiqtor, was killed in battle, and the youngest, Menas, was captured and sent as a slave to the Ottoman overlord of Yemen. In desperation, Lebna Dengel sent a plee for help to the King of Portugal. In doing that, he saved his country, but he would not see the result, as he died on the run, exhausted and miserable in 1540.
Spelling fix for a Serbian monarch:
Code:
historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 0121041 }
startdate = {
day = 13
month = february
year = 1804
}
deathdate = {
day = 20
month = september
year = 1813
}
name = "[COLOR=Yellow]Karadjordje[/COLOR] Petrovic"
DIP = 7
ADM = 8
MIL = 7
dormant = no
remark = "Black George - Fled to the Austrian Empire in 1813"
}
Typo:
#-#As the Act of Union-'Rzeczpospolita Polska' was instituted in 1569 and the united Sejm moved to the small town of Warszawa it did not take long until it was also made a Royal capital. With this change the centre point for Polish attention was moved North and East.
Code:
3360#(1570-1670) Warszawa
event = {
id = 3479
trigger = {
NOT = { exists = LIT }
owned = { province = 291 data = -1 }
control = { province = 291 data = -1 }
}
random = no
country = POL
name = "EVENTNAME3479" #Warszawa
desc = "EVENTHIST3479"
Code:
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1570 }
offset = 30
deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1670 }
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAME3479A" #[COLOR=Red]Let[/COLOR][COLOR=Yellow]Let's[/COLOR] move the Capital to Warszawa
command = { type = capital which = 291 } #Masovia
command = { type = land value = 1000 }
command = { type = infra value = 1000 }
command = { type = trade value = 500 }
command = { type = stability value = 1 }
}A little correction for description of FRA_170058:
#-#Born in 1715, Jean-Baptiste de Gribeauval quickly enlisted himself into the artillery. Paradoxically, when he became officer, he enlisted into the armies of France's traditional armiesenemies. He first served in the Prussian Army, and after that, in the Austrian Army in 1757 and in whose service he fought Prussian armies at Glatz and Schweidnitz. After being promoted to the rank of lieutenant general in 1764, he began to reform the artillery and sapper forces, but he fell into disgrace in 1774. Recalled in 1776 to the appointment of the inspector of artillery by the War Minister, he went on with modernisation by distinguishing between campaign artillery and siege artillery. His name has been given to the hardware which helped French guns be mounted and used more effectively. During the French Revolution and during Napoléon Ier reign, his modernisation of artillery had given the French army a sizeable advantage.
And another one for FRA_170069:
#-#Between June 30, 1764 and June 19, 1767, 104 murders were perpetrated in the province of Gevaudan in the southern Auvergne. All the victims were women or children, but no adult man was attacked. All the accounts of the eyewitnesses of the attacks described an animal looking like a wolf. But the wounds, extremely unusual, such as the size of the bites as well as decapitations, couldn't be made by a wolf but only by a 'beast'. In front of the extent of the massacre and the inefficiency of the local lords, the peasants called upon Louis XV. He, touched by their misfortunes, sent a regiment of dragoons commanded by the captain Duhamel to solve the problem. Despite several beats and the massacre of hundreds of wolves, the attacks didn't stop. Louis XV even had to send his personal gun carrier, François Antoine de Beauterne, who does not succeed in doing better than Duhamel. This story had unpleasant consequences on the reign of Louis XV. Not only the peasants always remained under the threat of the 'beast', but became exhausted by the many hunts without being able to plough their fields. Moreover, by the failure of Duhamel and Beauterne, Louis XV became the laughing stock of the other monarchs, especially in England, and the secretly published newspapers tackled its authority severely. The affair fascinated all the French and became one fo the main subject of conversation during two years.
#-#Born in 1715, Jean-Baptiste de Gribeauval quickly enlisted himself into the artillery. Paradoxically, when he became officer, he enlisted into the armies of France's traditional armiesenemies. He first served in the Prussian Army, and after that, in the Austrian Army in 1757 and in whose service he fought Prussian armies at Glatz and Schweidnitz. After being promoted to the rank of lieutenant general in 1764, he began to reform the artillery and sapper forces, but he fell into disgrace in 1774. Recalled in 1776 to the appointment of the inspector of artillery by the War Minister, he went on with modernisation by distinguishing between campaign artillery and siege artillery. His name has been given to the hardware which helped French guns be mounted and used more effectively. During the French Revolution and during Napoléon Ier reign, his modernisation of artillery had given the French army a sizeable advantage.
And another one for FRA_170069:
#-#Between June 30, 1764 and June 19, 1767, 104 murders were perpetrated in the province of Gevaudan in the southern Auvergne. All the victims were women or children, but no adult man was attacked. All the accounts of the eyewitnesses of the attacks described an animal looking like a wolf. But the wounds, extremely unusual, such as the size of the bites as well as decapitations, couldn't be made by a wolf but only by a 'beast'. In front of the extent of the massacre and the inefficiency of the local lords, the peasants called upon Louis XV. He, touched by their misfortunes, sent a regiment of dragoons commanded by the captain Duhamel to solve the problem. Despite several beats and the massacre of hundreds of wolves, the attacks didn't stop. Louis XV even had to send his personal gun carrier, François Antoine de Beauterne, who does not succeed in doing better than Duhamel. This story had unpleasant consequences on the reign of Louis XV. Not only the peasants always remained under the threat of the 'beast', but became exhausted by the many hunts without being able to plough their fields. Moreover, by the failure of Duhamel and Beauterne, Louis XV became the laughing stock of the other monarchs, especially in England, and the secretly published newspapers tackled its authority severely. The affair fascinated all the French and became one fo the main subject of conversation during two years.
Spelling corrections for ENG_3011 and ENG_3753, in that order:
#-#The Admiralty was instituted to give the growing naval power an efficient and strong strategic leadership at Sea. Earlier there had only existed a number of odd King's ship's, each of which were the King's personal property. By making the admiralty responsible for all warships and the production of new and the repair of old the English navy got continuity and order. The Admiralty was also a plant school for military leaders and also important figures in the political life of London.
#-#England as we know it decided on becoming a naval power and instituted the Admiralty as one of its assets. There were also signs of England taking another route, a route toward the continent and Land Power. Some elements can be found in Cromwell's New Model Army, but also the question-marks of a possible pro-French Stuart Dynasty and/or if England had managed to keep some of its French possessions. If that had happened England would have had much greater interests to protect on the Continent than on the High Seas.
#-#The Admiralty was instituted to give the growing naval power an efficient and strong strategic leadership at Sea. Earlier there had only existed a number of odd King's ship's, each of which were the King's personal property. By making the admiralty responsible for all warships and the production of new and the repair of old the English navy got continuity and order. The Admiralty was also a plant school for military leaders and also important figures in the political life of London.
#-#England as we know it decided on becoming a naval power and instituted the Admiralty as one of its assets. There were also signs of England taking another route, a route toward the continent and Land Power. Some elements can be found in Cromwell's New Model Army, but also the question-marks of a possible pro-French Stuart Dynasty and/or if England had managed to keep some of its French possessions. If that had happened England would have had much greater interests to protect on the Continent than on the High Seas.
In my current game, Friesland is getting all leaders double. It started at the end of 15th century, after Saxony got some event about Friesland and Friesland got a "Change of Language" event.
Other "there where" problems:
EVENTHIST3265;João I was chosen by the people to rule in Portugal in 1385. He was also much loved throughout his reign and made a lot of changes to the benefit of both the people and to strengthen the Portuguese trade as well as ability to explore the new world. Of course there where powerful noblemen not happy about these changes since it meant losing some of the power they had before.;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST3457;As a reaction of the introduction of the Henrykian Articles and the Pacta Conventa in Poland in 1573 the Magnates approach the King and urged him to constitutionalize the rights of the Szlachta and to share power with them. If not they said, he not they would have to take the consequences. At this point Mikolaj II Krzysztof had newly been crowned. He was young and not as negative to noble power as his father had been. In an effort to keep societal peace he accepted a compromise. There where no Henrykian articles, but the constitution was modified implying that the Szlachta was the life-nerve of society with certain rights to hold office and legislative power. The Principle of Religious Tolerance was also confirmed.;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST3482;The political and economic disunity of the Szlachta and the deluge was the most important social factors behind the creation and implementation of the Liberum Veto in 1652. It was on one hand a guarantee that decisions where decided unanimously and on the other hand a safeguard for the personal freedom of the individual nobleman. However for Poland as a country it was disastrous and one among a half dozen reason for the demise of the country in 1795. One single NO vote in the Sejm could dissolve the Sejm and paralyze decision-making in the country. It was also used frequently in the lesser Sejms, the sejmiki, of which there where over 70 in Poland. The Magnates that had detronized the Executive Power had now also detronized the Legislative Power.;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST3265;João I was chosen by the people to rule in Portugal in 1385. He was also much loved throughout his reign and made a lot of changes to the benefit of both the people and to strengthen the Portuguese trade as well as ability to explore the new world. Of course there where powerful noblemen not happy about these changes since it meant losing some of the power they had before.;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST3457;As a reaction of the introduction of the Henrykian Articles and the Pacta Conventa in Poland in 1573 the Magnates approach the King and urged him to constitutionalize the rights of the Szlachta and to share power with them. If not they said, he not they would have to take the consequences. At this point Mikolaj II Krzysztof had newly been crowned. He was young and not as negative to noble power as his father had been. In an effort to keep societal peace he accepted a compromise. There where no Henrykian articles, but the constitution was modified implying that the Szlachta was the life-nerve of society with certain rights to hold office and legislative power. The Principle of Religious Tolerance was also confirmed.;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST3482;The political and economic disunity of the Szlachta and the deluge was the most important social factors behind the creation and implementation of the Liberum Veto in 1652. It was on one hand a guarantee that decisions where decided unanimously and on the other hand a safeguard for the personal freedom of the individual nobleman. However for Poland as a country it was disastrous and one among a half dozen reason for the demise of the country in 1795. One single NO vote in the Sejm could dissolve the Sejm and paralyze decision-making in the country. It was also used frequently in the lesser Sejms, the sejmiki, of which there where over 70 in Poland. The Magnates that had detronized the Executive Power had now also detronized the Legislative Power.;;;;;;;;;;
This "behaviour" normally happens when leaders who are not dormant get a wake command.Lord Grave said:
I checked and it is strange because possible involved events are FRI_22006 and FRI_22005 but they sleep each other and corresponding monarchs are indeed dormant. Do you have a savefile just before 1498?
Last edited:
YodaMaster said:
Sadly, no. The latest I have before 1498 is 1486, and the first one after 1498 is 1504. I'm not sure if any one of those would be interesting to you but I'm backing them up just in case. I'll look at FRI events and see if I can find out what went wrong. Maybe the history log from 1504 would be useful for you to see which event sequence took place?