Home Trending Latest threads New posts Developer diaries

1.56 BUG LIST-Please Help Make The AGCEEP Better

Jump to latest Follow Reply
  • We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
EVENTHIST159038;
Finally the entire Kalmar Union were again under direct control by the Danish crown. Now time had come for desiding upon the fate of the old union.
Finally all of the Kalmar Union was again under the direct rule of the Danish Crown. The time had now come to decide the fate and future of the old and troublesome Union.
 
AGCEEP_Specific_Berg.eue

As we can see, it must be an AI only succession event, then the desc is unnecessary.
Also we can remove EVENTHIST235003 from "text.csv," I think.
Code: 
event = {
	id = 235003
	trigger = {
		ai = yes
		NOT = { exists = GEL }
		exists = SAC
		exists = KLE
	}
	random = no
	country = MUN
	name = "EVENTNAME235003" #The succession in Jülich-Berg
	desc = "[color=red]EVENTHIST235003[/color]"
	#-#

	date = { day = 6 month = september year = 1511 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME235003A" #Johann of Kleve-Mark succeeds
		command = { type = relation which = KLE value = 200 }
		command = { type = dynastic which = KLE }
		command = { type = relation which = GEL value = -50 }
		command = { type = relation which = SAC value = -50 }
		command = { type = relation which = HAB value = 50 }
		command = { type = stability value = -1 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME235003B" #Ernst of Saxony succeeds (End Game)
		command = { type = trigger which = 273030 } #SAC: Inheritance of Jülich-Berg
	}
}
#-#The anabaptists rejected the baptism of infants, military service and private propery, and believed that the apocalypse was imminent. On Easter 1531, as these doctines were gaining popularity in Strassburg, which had been declared the new Jerusalem, Berhard Rothmann, a preacher at a Münster church began preaching anabaptist doctrines in the city. Meanwhile, Jan Matthys, a baker from Haarlem, arrived in Strassburg, and declared that he was Enoch, the second witness described in the book of revelations. After encountering troubles in Strassburg Matthys announced that Münster was in fact the New Jerusalem, and that it would be the seat of the thousand year reign of Christ, which he and his followers would bring about. In February 1534 the Anabaptists, with the support of a faction in the city, started to arrive in Münster. The city went into a religious frenzy. By the end of February all Catholics and Lutherans were exiled from the city, and the Bishop was beginning a seige, supported by his neighbours, the Landgrave of Hesse, the duke of Cleves and the elector of Cologne. By Easter, all citizens were required to turn over all of their poperty so it could be evenly distributed to the people. On Easter Sunday, which Matthys had identified as the date of the second coming, he led a sortie agianst the bishop, assuring his followers that god had given him powers, and that he could not be harmed by their enemies. Despite this he was killed leading the sortie, and leadership of the Anabaptists passed to Jan of Leyden, Matthys' disciple. He banned all money, and in July decreed that marriage was compulsory for all women and that polygamy was required by the bible. In September he took the title 'King of the World' and took Matthys' widow as his sixteenth wife. Anabaptist writings did induce some revolts in the Netherlands, but the city received no help as the siege continued. After Easter 1535 passed without the second coming, thebesiegers managed to enter the city and overcome the remaining defenders. For two days the leaders were executed, and the privileges of all protestant sects in Münster were revoked.
 
You're right but better keep it as an information and meaning of the event.

Nevertheless, many entries are the same from MUN_235002 to MUN_235008 and all duplicates of 235002 will be removed.
 
Typo:
Code: 
#(1465) Confederacy of Zelena Hora
event = {
	id = 129014
	trigger = {
		event = 129013 #BOH: Conflict with the Church
		OR = {
			owned = { province = 314 data = -1 }
			owned = { province = 315 data = -1 }
			owned = { province = 329 data = -1 }
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = BOH
	name = "EVENTNAME129014" #The Romanist confedera[COLOR=Red]d[/COLOR][COLOR=Yellow]c[/COLOR]y of Zelena Hora
	desc = "EVENTHIST129014"
	#-#

	date = { day = 28 month = november year = 1465 }

	action_a = {
		name = "OUCH"
		command = { type = revolt which = 314 } #Silesia
		command = { type = revolt which = 315 } #Moravia
		command = { type = revolt which = 329 } #Erz
		command = { type = revolt which = 328 } #Bohemia
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 314 value = 4 } #Silesia
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 315 value = 4 } #Moravia
		command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 329 value = 4 } #Erz
	}
}
#-#After George's refusal of the church's demands to suppress the Hussite faith in 1462 the Romanist party in Bohemia became even more embittered against the King whom they regarded both as a heretic and as a political enemy who was about to curtail the nobility's privileges. At a meeting in Zelena Hora on November 28th 1465 most of them formed a confederacy championed by Zdenek of Sternberg against him and began open revolt. The lands of the crown, Silesia, Moravia and Lusatia, that were almost entirely catholic opposed George most strongly. He completely lost control of these lands to the Catholics after the formation of the confederacy. While the Royalists obtained some successes in Bohemia and quickly seized all castles held by the rebels there, they failed in Silesia, Moravia and Lusatia. George's rule and the survival of the Hussite faith were seriously endangered.
 
YodaMaster said:
You're right but better keep it as an information and meaning of the event.
Click to expand...
I can see your point, but the text seems to not be concerned with the succession in Jülich-Berg sequence :confused:
Also, "Münster Anabaptist Revolt" related events already exists such as KLE_200021 and KLE_200023 with a similar desc: Maybe someone fogot to say to remove it when he moved these IDs, I think.


(KLE_200021)
#-#Anabaptism is considered to be an extreme form of radical Protestantism. The Zwickau Prophets and Thomas Müntzer were the very first Anabaptists of all time, though some scholars believe that similar doctrines can be found on John Wycliffe and Jan Hus. Anabaptists were distinguishable because of their belief that child baptism was a sin. Consequently they only baptized adults, believing that being a Christian had to be a mature thorough decision. Rejecting salvation only by faith such as Luther claimed (Romans 1.17), Anabaptists also believed a model life in Christ imitation was necessary to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. The first Anabaptist movements, such as that of Müntzer, were characterized by millenarist violence. Millenarism theologists claimed to have come to Earth to reform all customs and to prepare it for the imminent arrival of the Messiah. Münster was by 1530's was a multi-confessional city, and as such, many Anabaptists from all over Rhineland flocked to it. Among their leaders were Jan van Leyden, Bernard Knipperdolling, Bernard Rothmann and Jan Matthys. After installing communism and polygamy, Jan van Leyden was crowned King of Münster and invited Dutch and German Anabaptists to join the city. Unfortunately the Bishop had already started the siege which lasted more than a year. Many foreigners were arrested in the proximity ad savagely tortured by catholic and protestant troops. After a large starve and desperation, two soldiers finally opened the city doors and let the Bishop's troops start the horrible massacre.
 
forever monarch :( (golden horde if chooses not to become crimea) :(

historicalmonarch = {
id = { type = 6 id = 0128509 }
startdate = {
year = 1499
}
deathdate = {
year = 1502
}
name = "Sayyid Ahmad II"
DIP = 3
ADM = 2
MIL = 5
dormant = no
 
This is not a bug per se. Only reason is we have no idea of plausible rulers if Golden Horde survives (or I'm not aware of it and it was never implemented...).

We could use Crimean monarchs but I'm not sure if it makes sense.
 
YodaMaster said:
This is not a bug per se. Only reason is we have no idea of plausible rulers if Golden Horde survives (or I'm not aware of it and it was never implemented...).

We could use Crimean monarchs but I'm not sure if it makes sense.
Click to expand...

how about just simplly randomize them as inca empire has, etc
 
YodaMaster said:
Why not... Only question is finding plausible names.
Click to expand...

Well I think the Incans aren't a good example as the comments in the file seem to suggest that the monarchs listed were real people, just not monarchs. I think this would be more in line of QAR, AKK, and UZB.

Plausible names aren't too hard. Just make combinations out of names in the STE, AST, CRI and KAZ monarch files. That's how I made up the names for the previously mentioned states.

All that said, this isn't a bug as it is clearly working as designed.
 
Garbon said:
Well I think the Incans aren't a good example as the comments in the file seem to suggest that the monarchs listed were real people, just not monarchs. I think this would be more in line of QAR, AKK, and UZB.

Plausible names aren't too hard. Just make combinations out of names in the STE, AST, CRI and KAZ monarch files. That's how I made up the names for the previously mentioned states.

All that said, this isn't a bug as it is clearly working as designed.
Click to expand...

i thoight having the "*" besides the name does indeed confirms they ARE not real...
btw same thing for luxemburgh,...very fun nation to play, etc but stuck with one monarch if does not chooses to seel itslef(the player) to burgundy :rolleyes:
having a BLASt with lux at the moment :D ( had to ditch the golden horde for the monarch reason, gets boring FAST due to unchanged variables ...)

ah and just realized something as well :( . the 10 rr in artois , that LUX gets in an earlly event, is never going away aparentlly ; that if LUX does not cedes the province away to burgundy in the related event.( but i know rr goes away IF burgundy owns it). not SURE if this was intentional or just an "add-on safe" event should be written?
 
Last edited:
beregic said:
i thoight having the "*" besides the name does indeed confirms they ARE not real...
btw same thing for luxemburgh,...very fun nation to play, etc but stuck with one monarch if does not chooses to seel itslef(the player) to burgundy :rolleyes:
having a BLASt with lux at the moment :D ( had to ditch the golden horde for the monarch reason, gets boring FAST due to unchanged variables ...)
Click to expand...
Not real or outside country lifespan.

This is why I proposed a third symbol. ;)
Anyway, easy to "fix" for Incas and missing comment in monarchs file.

beregic said:
ah and just realized something as well :( . the 10 rr in artois , that LUX gets in an earlly event, is never going away aparentlly ; that if LUX does not cedes the province away to burgundy in the related event.( but i know rr goes away IF burgundy owns it). not SURE if this was intentional or just an "add-on safe" event should be written?
Click to expand...
Yes, province revoltrisk should vanish at some point. Same problem with Friesen and LUX_213005 action_b.
 
Last edited:
Duplicated texts

They aren't bugs but we can unify their duplicated texts, I think:

----------------
ALT_Italy_193001-6 "Italian leaders"
EVENTNAME19300x;Italian leaders;;;;;;;;;;
EVENTHIST19300x;We will get the services of additional leaders and our monarchs will rule Italy.;;;;;;;;;;
ACTIONNAME19300xA;Our new leaders!;;;;;;;;;;​
* We can put them all together EVENTNAME/EVENTHIST/ACTIONNAME while only exception is EVENTHIST193002 because it's a special text for Milan-Italy.

----------------
ProvinceSpec_338200-4 "Petty Kingdoms of the Barbary Coast"
ProvinceSpec_338205-9 "Lands of the Barbary"
#-#During the 15th century, between the domains of Morocco and Tunisia, the Barbary coast was ruled by several petty Kingdoms. Most noteworthy of these Kingdoms, where the Zayyanids of Tlemcen whose power had begun to wane during the 14th century. Fiercely independent,it is unlikely that these petty Kingdoms would allowed themselves to be ruled by a foreign master.​
* We can merge their EVENTHISTs into one entry and EVENTNAMEs into two according to their current names. However, maybe we shoudn't touch their ACTIONNAMEs because they seem to reflect their different effects.
 
beregic said:
forever monarch (golden horde if chooses not to become crimea)
Click to expand...
YodaMaster said:
This is not a bug per se. Only reason is we have no idea of plausible rulers if Golden Horde survives (or I'm not aware of it and it was never implemented...).

We could use Crimean monarchs but I'm not sure if it makes sense.
Click to expand...
beregic said:
how about just simplly randomize them as inca empire has, etc
Click to expand...
Can we use monarchs of Nogai Horde until 1642? They are a branch of Golden Horde while current AGCEEP doesn't adopt them.

EDIT: I checked the monarchs of vanilla Nogai file (monarchs.nog) right now. We can take in their monarchs until 1783 if we call small Nogai into account.
 
Last edited:
waishi said:
Can we use monarchs of Nogai Horde until 1642? They are a branch of Golden Horde while current AGCEEP doesn't adopt them.

EDIT: I checked the monarchs of vanilla Nogai file (monarchs.nog) right now. We can take in their monarchs until 1783 if we call small Nogai into account.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure that is a good idea, seeing as how we do plan to bring the Nogai back.
 
hmmm...
playing as ormuz, it is 1575 and never had any event or changed the flag to oman. portugal atacked me by event( with no imput or word to be said on my part as in an event)
what is GOING on? :(

i see that in 1625 will be changing flag, BUT i had NONE of the previous events...within ormuz file, even if persia was around around those dates.
 
beregic said:
hmmm...
playing as ormuz, it is 1575 and never had any event or changed the flag to oman. portugal atacked me by event( with no imput or word to be said on my part as in an event)
what is GOING on? :(

i see that in 1625 will be changing flag, BUT i had NONE of the previous events...within ormuz file, even if persia was around around those dates.
Click to expand...

My guess would be that you had more than 7 provinces, which exempts you from all events but the 1625 one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back