We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
One could say this for just about anything. In this case, one of the sides has an argument which does not involve supporting someone who practiced massive political repression and ethnic cleansing.
I'll give him one thing, and one thing only. He as right that if the croats in Bosnia deserve self-determination and their own state/annexation by the mother country, then so did the bosnian Serbs. Naturally, being a nationalist hypocrite, he did not extend this to the Vojvodinan Hungarians, or the Kosovar Albanians. Scumbag.
That is to say nothing of the methods of the war crimes of the serbs.
Indeed. I wonder how many articles of Serbian Constitution of 1990 did Milosevic actually violate? The link is to the English translation of the Serbian Constitution of 1990.
What is the other side? I mean he’s an evil genocidal maniac who destroyed a nation in order to kill more people. Is there another side outside of small minded Serbian nationalist fantasyland?
If being so much of a problem that the backlash results in legislation to prevent something like that from ever happening again is "making things better", then he made improvements. Other than that, I can't see much good in what he did, but a lot of blatant evil.
While the trial against him for numerous crimes against humanity never finished, We're sorry, but this is not a subject that we will allow to continue on the forum.