After a suggestion from Martinus, I decided to take a look at the 1187 scenario for problems.
- Norway: My sources indicates that there was a rebellion 1185-1188 against the King of Norway. It was centered in the Akeshus area but also spread towards the west. Leader of Rebellion: Jon Kuvlung, monk, claims to be the son of dead king Inge. The rebels should at least control Akershus and Vestfold.
- Denmark: In 1187 Bishop Valdemar of Slesvig was replaced as a ruler in Syd-Jylland by Valdemar, brother of the King. (I guess that this could mean that the Slesvig province should be a Bishopry under Valdemar of Slesvig?)
Source:
"När Hände Vad I Nordens Historia", Rosborn, Schimanski, et al., 1997, MånPocket
Other things:
- Desht-i-Kipchak shouldn't belong to Kexholm.
- Satakunta should belong to Sweden or at least be catholic and have a Swedish ruler.
- The situation in Sweden seems strange. Don't know how it should be however.
- Nyland should probably belong to Tavasts.
- Norway: My sources indicates that there was a rebellion 1185-1188 against the King of Norway. It was centered in the Akeshus area but also spread towards the west. Leader of Rebellion: Jon Kuvlung, monk, claims to be the son of dead king Inge. The rebels should at least control Akershus and Vestfold.
- Denmark: In 1187 Bishop Valdemar of Slesvig was replaced as a ruler in Syd-Jylland by Valdemar, brother of the King. (I guess that this could mean that the Slesvig province should be a Bishopry under Valdemar of Slesvig?)
Source:
"När Hände Vad I Nordens Historia", Rosborn, Schimanski, et al., 1997, MånPocket
Other things:
- Desht-i-Kipchak shouldn't belong to Kexholm.
- Satakunta should belong to Sweden or at least be catholic and have a Swedish ruler.
- The situation in Sweden seems strange. Don't know how it should be however.
- Nyland should probably belong to Tavasts.