• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

koontz

Major
6 Badges
Jan 10, 2007
581
0
  • Arsenal of Democracy
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Darkest Hour
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Naval War: Arctic Circle
  • 500k Club
Would be really useful imo, dont now how to make sceanrios but can assit somenoe whith historical reserach.
 
Seconded. I've always wanted to play Fall Gelb in the GC.
 
Ah my idea was the scenario would start right after the fall of france, designed for mainly MP games.
 
Multiplayer wise that would be great. Not sure if its OT but another scenario we could use is 43' because Germany and japan still kinda sorta had a chance to win. Even right after Stalingrad fell there was a German offensive that encircled and captured a few hundred thousand Soviet soldiers Stalin was trying to do peace even at a point where we look back and say it was over by then. So just my 2 cents. Anything that makes multiplayer more fun is great imo.
 
Much as I would love to do scenarios for every year of the war, I'm afraid the amount of work involved is immense. Getting correct OOBs for every country, figuring out where the front line was in every theatre of the war, finding out where every major warship was, every major naval and air base... It really is a huge task, and not one we can do by December, I'm afraid. If we had started 18 months ago, maybe - but then we would not have needed any code changes for that...
 
Not only the problem of creating, i think for an MP game the problem of balancing is the higher amount of work.

The 36 szenario has the advantage, that balancing is not that hard as player have 4 years to buildup.
 
Well at least we are getting some new battle scenario's. :)