historical: kingdom of zeta
The province of zeta is under byzantine rule, i checked my history book and here is the chronology of events for this province
-prior to 1035. - under byzantine rule
-duke bojislav(1035.-1050.)* - sometime during his era he overthrew byzantine rule and became independent
-mihajlo(1050.-1082.)* - pope grgur VII (george VII in english?) gives him the title king of zeta
-bodin(1085.-1101.)* - expanded his realm on rashka and a part of bosnia, after his death byzantium ruled duklja(zeta)
-12.ct - rashka takes over zeta from the byzantines
*reign years, birthdates unknown
- anyway, there should be a mihajlo, king of zeta, count of zeta in 1066. who is not a vassal of byzantium. but, i guess adding a new kingdom that would never again resurface is rather complicated, duklja should just be made an independent county, or perhaps given the title duke of rashka for the time being, since the two were closely bound in that era
The province of zeta is under byzantine rule, i checked my history book and here is the chronology of events for this province
-prior to 1035. - under byzantine rule
-duke bojislav(1035.-1050.)* - sometime during his era he overthrew byzantine rule and became independent
-mihajlo(1050.-1082.)* - pope grgur VII (george VII in english?) gives him the title king of zeta
-bodin(1085.-1101.)* - expanded his realm on rashka and a part of bosnia, after his death byzantium ruled duklja(zeta)
-12.ct - rashka takes over zeta from the byzantines
*reign years, birthdates unknown
- anyway, there should be a mihajlo, king of zeta, count of zeta in 1066. who is not a vassal of byzantium. but, i guess adding a new kingdom that would never again resurface is rather complicated, duklja should just be made an independent county, or perhaps given the title duke of rashka for the time being, since the two were closely bound in that era
Upvote
0