353) BUG: Province.csv & Province_name.csv

[unmerged(13277)]

Some Province.csv stuff

Bremen (995) seems to be incorrectly placed under the ‘Region_River’ region. I think it should be ‘Germany’. Also has ‘Norse’ as default culture – is that correct??

Province 311 and 364 (mid-north germany) are named identical on the map (probably unchangeable), but different in Province.csv.

Sea province 242 (Bodensee) has no region assigned and it has a port number assigned! Should probably be assigned the region ‘Region_Lake’. Seeing that no other Ocean, lake or river provinces has a port number assigned, this seems to be a mistake.

Several sea provinces have a culture assigned (other than Norse). Don’t know if it means anything??

Orvieto (898) in Italy has Norse culture default. Also has no value in Sea zone, don’t know if it means anything, should probably be zero anyway.

Capua (997), map says Cabua, in Italy, has Russian culture default. Also has no value in Sea zone, don’t know if it means anything, should probably be zero anyway.

Syrj (399), Romny (403) and Novgorod Seversky (567) seem all to be misplaced in the ‘Dnepr’ area. Syrj and Romny should probably be in the ‘Kama’ area. Novgorod Seversky should probably be in the ‘Sredne_Russka’ area.

Province 6, 280, 281, 393, 394, 395, 404 and 405 all have a fraction number in income. Seeing that no other has under 1 (except Ocean, sea and rivers) and even the desert of the Middle East have at least 1, this is probably a mistake.

994, 999-1003 seems not to used, but carries identical names of other used provinces. No big deal, but maybe using like ‘unused’ in name would be a good idea in order to avoid confusion.

 

[Grosshaus]

Are those provinces you mentioned (6, 280 etc.) in Northern Russia? If so, then those are WAD.

 

[unmerged(13277)]

Are those provinces you mentioned (6, 280 etc.) in Northern Russia? If so, then those are WAD.

WAD eh??
This seems like a very strange selection of provinces!! – if I might say so!!
8 !!! Provinces of 900 !!! are specified 10 times less valuable then the closest one – and they lay in Northern Europe and Northern Russia!!

Not in the Desert of Syrian or Iraq, or the 80% pure desert country Egypt or the absolutely god-forsaken desert of Cyrenaica or Quattara where you can walk around not meeting a soul in a 1000 years much less anything to eat…… no… the 8 specified provinces that is 10 times less valuable then all the rest 900 in the game, lay in Northern Europe and Northern Russia!!!

Hmmmmmmmm…pretty much sums this up… now I wanna know why is this WAD?? (don’t leave me hanging with just WAD!!)

 

[State Machine]

Prov 242 is an old beta bug. Prov 995 is disturbing if *995* is really Bremen...

I'll post in the beta about these two.

 

[Grosshaus]

WAD eh??
This seems like a very strange selection of provinces!! – if I might say so!!
8 !!! Provinces of 900 !!! are specified 10 times less valuable then the closest one – and they lay in Northern Europe and Northern Russia!!

Not in the Desert of Syrian or Iraq, or the 80% pure desert country Egypt or the absolutely god-forsaken desert of Cyrenaica or Quattara where you can walk around not meeting a soul in a 1000 years much less anything to eat…… no… the 8 specified provinces that is 10 times less valuable then all the rest 900 in the game, lay in Northern Europe and Northern Russia!!!

Hmmmmmmmm…pretty much sums this up… now I wanna know why is this WAD?? (don’t leave me hanging with just WAD!!)

I'd rather have the base values of those Saharan provinces reduced than these increased, with lots of inventions and buildings it's possible to get pretty high an income in provinces which historically gave little or no income. There were nomads which were taxed sporadically, not much more.

The one in Southern Sweden seems like a bug, but there should be more of extreme low income provinces in the region, at least in Kemi, Kola, Karelen and those in the North-East corner. Oh, and the bishopry Novgorod has as a vassal with 6 base income seems like a bug to me.

 

[unmerged(13277)]

Some more stuff

Duchy of Azov is a split duchy. Looks a little strange, is province 564 supposed to be part of the Duchy Azov?

Province 567 belongs to a non-existing Duchy, PROM. It should be PRON

Province 400, is a lone one province Kingdom named ‘Volga’ (VOLG). However ‘VOLG’ is also a Duchy, which is much larger. Is VOLG supposed to be both a small Kingdom and a large Duchy? Does this even work??
I suspect province 400 belong to the Bolgar kingdom!

 

[Cat Lord]

BUG: Province 995 in Province.csv

Found by Wilhelm II. :

But i wonder a bit about 995:

995;PROV995;Bremen;Region_River;Wesser;

It's the river weser isn't it?
BTW it's wrong spelled in province.csv(Weser is correct not Wesser )

The line is not consistent:

995;PROV995;Bremen;Region_River;Wesser;;[B]Plains[/B];

A river shouldn't be a plain... Or other part of the line are wrong (Region_River).

As for the name, if it's the river, it should be corrected in province_name.csv

Cheers,

Cat

 

[unmerged(13277)]

Found by Wilhelm II. :



The line is not consistent:

995;PROV995;Bremen;Region_River;Wesser;;[B]Plains[/B];

A river shouldn't be a plain... Or other part of the line are wrong (Region_River).

As for the name, if it's the river, it should be corrected in province_name.csv

Cheers,

Cat

I already listed numours bugs, including this one, of the province.cvs
here, which I hope willbe fixed in the next version

 

[Cat Lord]

I already listed numours bugs, including this one, of the province.cvs
here, which I hope willbe fixed in the next version

Woops, thanks.

I will merge the 2 threads...

Cat

 

[unmerged(13277)]

Btw this is NOT a river province, but the land province 'Bremen'

 

[unmerged(23737)]

Btw this is NOT a river province, but the land province 'Bremen'

Yes you're right it's the only entry for Bremen but then region_river is wrong.
It's not Venice!
But there's no other entry in province.csv for the river Weser(or in province.csv it's spelled Wesser)!?
Surely something is wrong there!

 

[unmerged(13277)]

Yes you're right it's the only entry for Bremen but then region_river is wrong.
It's not Venice!

Yes that is the very opening letters of this thread

But there's no other entry in province.csv for the river Weser(or in province.csv it's spelled Wesser)!?
Surely something is wrong there!

Sure there is, The river itself is province 971.

The 'wesser' under Bremen is the 'area', and means nothing however it is spelled. It could be spelled any way you like. Beside you cannot just chaage these spellings, as a whole lot of other provinces also carring this 'area' would now be wrong.

Changing the display name, in province_names.csv, could on the other hand be easy done. Btw there are lots of names like this.

 

[unmerged(23737)]

Yes that is the very opening letters of this thread

...sometimes it's better if i read a thread from the begining!
I haven't found the river, but if you say it's in the i will believe you.

 

[unmerged(28842)]

Could that be the reason why it is not possible to start as Bremen?
(Would be my favorite since I live there )

Starting in a river (Weser would be correct) is surely a nice idea for evolution but as an evolved human... No, I would prefer 'germany' instead of 'region_river'.