3rd Armored has that job. 4th armored can be something else.
I kinda agree on other parts. Tho i want 4th AD income to be nerfed. And 4th AD has perhaps the best availability in the game, they can bring all they have while many other decks can't. Abundance of French M10 cards doesnt really mean much.
Ah it's cause we don't use the word availability with the same meaning. Availability to me is the number of units per card and the number of cards per deck. Not really the numbers you may bring on the field, that's related to points. In a way, there is the availability and there is what you can effectively do with it.
You could nerf 4AD income in B but only with a joint nerf on units price, cause most unit cost 130 points or below and you may bring them earlier (in one thick) than in any other deck. Reducing the points flow in B wouldn't change much the possibility for 4AD to bring them earlier than any other deck.
You could obviously reduce drastically the income in B and C and let the prices untouched but i like to give the player points and let him choose what he wants to bring on the field (more cheap infantry etc) than reduce his points but let him the same units prices he has no possibility to use. It is a different approach.
The prob of 2DB actually is that, 2DB has too costly units for points flow in regard to other decks.
It's not much about the great units within the deck (each deck has powerful/peak units), it's more about reducing the timing to use these powerful/peak units in regard to other decks points flow.
In time you may get you first 340 panther in B with Lehr, 4AD has already been able to get 2 phase A hellcats + 2 phase B hellcats which gives 4AD player the virtual ability if he stacks them to engage your panther at max range, panick it quickly and kill it afterwards. It's just insane.
It's properly insane knowing Lehr is supposed to be the king on the field armor speaking in this early B momentum to start contest the ground he wasn't able to make in A.
Last edited: