What, for example?CK2 team, I hope one day CK2 will get something similiar to the new free EUIV DLC, some unique flavour when playing a female ruler would be nice![]()
What, for example?
Jure uxoris! Your husband takes all your titles for himself(would be a nice plot...)
Nope, not that I've heard of, unfortunately. No Dharmic ones either.
Isn't the Duchess of Kiev in the Charlemagne start a female pagan ruler?@Rashtrakut, I checked in-game and they aren't even in there! So unfortunately they had to be removed from the list.
@Rashtrakut, I checked in-game and they aren't even in there! So unfortunately they had to be removed from the list.
Kashmir has two queens, both unfortunately outside available start points. Didda and Kota (whose husband should be King in 1337).
Rudrama Devi of the Kakatiya dynasty (Kingdom of Andhra) should be queen in her own right in the 1260s.
Ceylon should have a few reigning queens (all will be Buddhist) but the one who should fall in game time is
Lilavati (reigned 1197–1200, 1209–1210, and 1211–1212) widow of Parakramabhau the Great
These are at the kingdom level...there may be a few others at the lower ranks
Didda is a ruler in 980-1002, but that only works editing defines.txt.
1st May 1281
Rudrama Devi - Kakatiya Kingdom (Kingdom of Telingana) is actually playable.
Click on Beta Kakatiya to play her. It only shows him, but you will be her after you click start.
Missing history data messes that up, but she's playable if you ignore the UI issue.
The Parakramabahu I is missing in the files: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parakramabahu_I
as is his wife Lilavati you mentioned http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_Lilavati
Maybe add the info to the Suggestions forum ? They might add them. Indian history files seem to be lacking.
....
OT: The indian music DLC is actually quite nice. Wow. Only slightly indian in style, but not as bombastic as others and that's good. Bombastic gets boring after a short while.
Thanks I have asked this multiple times on the UI, they have never bothered. The Lankan kings seem to be all random, which is problematic...and it is actually the one Kingdom in India where the entire list is known
I wish there was a subforum (or even simply a normal thread) for correcting indisputable historical innacuracies with the game.
188441 = {
name="Kotadevi"
female=yes
religion="hindu"
culture="panjabi"
father=188440
trait="kshatriya"
trait="shaivist_hindu"
1281.1.1={
birth=yes
}
1338.6.1={
death=yes
}
}