• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

TheVikingWarrior

Sergeant
24 Badges
Mar 19, 2016
71
21
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Imperator: Rome - Magna Graecia
  • Age of Wonders: Planetfall
  • Prison Architect
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Europa Universalis IV: Golden Century
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cradle of Civilization
  • Surviving Mars
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Crusader Kings II
Hey there!

With the announcement that Europe would be the focus for the next update, and with the influx of map suggestion from the community, I decided to throw my own hat into the ring.

Inspired by @Van Kasten ’s brilliant suggestion of Central Italy, I decided to compile a list of changes to the map of the Duchy of Milan (and Lombardy). I’m going to point out my reasoning for each change in spoilers, look at different possibilities if it’s possible, and explain why I prioritized certain options over others.

Massima_espansione_Viscontea.png

800px-Grandi_Casate_Italiane_nel_1499.png

Index
  1. Lombardy
  2. Emilia & Novara
  3. Rivers and Lakes
  4. The Ambrosian Republic
Milan-edited.png



Lombardy

Lombardy is dominated by the duchy of Milan, emerging local power under the Visconti family. However, Milan has lost the eastern part of Lombardy to Venice during the wars of the last decades, losing Brescia and Bergamo to them. To the south, the independent Magravate of Mantova thrives under the Gonzaga.

For Lombardy, I added the provinces of Como, Pavia, and Bergamo. For accommodating the new provinces I split the Area in western and eastern Lombardy.

Disclaimer: I tweaked the development of the provinces, of course the devs know better than me, but the ratio should be kept.


- Milan: the capital of Duchy. In the last century, under the rule of the Visconti dynasty, Milan had expanded in all of Lombardy. This had made the city extremely rich, and it was one of the first cities in Europe to reach 100.000 citizens. The province includes Milan, the Milanese hinterland, Monza and the Milanese rural counties.

Province: Milano (please make it so Latin culture have the dynamic name of Milano)
Capital: Milano
Ownership & Cores: Milan
Culture: Lombard
Area: Western Lombardy
Dev: 10/10/7 (total: 27)
Terrain: Farmlands
Tradegood: Cloth (Milan also had a thriving weapon industry, so Iron could be an option maybe?)


- Como: the second biggest city in northern Lombardy after Bergamo and birthplace of Alessandro Volta, it had been an important city-state in the middle ages as it controlled the important mountain valleys of Ticino and Valtellina and their mountain passes. A thorn in the sides of Milan for many years, by this time the city had faced a decline after the civil war following the death of Duke Gian Galeazzo. Still, though, it was still the main cities of the region and develop the most important silk industry of Italy. The province includes Como, Lecco, Varese, and Ticino.

Province: Como
Capital: Como
Ownership & Cores: Milan
Culture: Lombard
Area: Western Lombardy
Dev: 4/4/2 (total: 10)
Terrain: Mountains
Tradegood: Wool (Como was known for its wool production, should change to silk around 1500)

Why Como? As already mentioned, it was the most important city in the area. Lombardy could use some more provinces as it is the most urbanized region in Europe with Flanders. It also gives a buffer for Milan with Switzerland, giving a province for the two to fight over.


- Pavia: ex-capital of the Lombard Kingdom, it had been an important center of resistance against the hegemony of Milan, being the last Lombard city to fall to the Visconti in 1360. In 1444 it is still an important center, with a rich library, and it would see one of the decisive battles of the Italian Wars. The province includes Pavia, Vigevano, Voghera, and Tortona.

Province: Pavia
Capital: Pavia
Ownership & Cores: Milan
Culture: Lombard
Area: Western Lombardy
Dev: 5/4/4 (total: 14)
Terrain: Farmlands
Tradegood: Cloth (important center of cloth production)

Why Pavia? Again, it was a very important city in the area and Lombardy could use some more provinces. It also had a very important market that could justify a lvl. 1 Center of trade.


- Cremona: Third largest city of Lombardy and old Milanese rival. In 1444 Francesco Sforza has the title of Count of Cremona at game start (as an appanage). The province includes Cremona, Crema, and Lodi.

Province: Cremona
Capital: Cremona
Ownership & Cores: Milan
Culture: Lombard
Area: Western Lombardy
Dev: 7/7/4 (total: 18)
Terrain: Farmlands
Tradegood: Grain (though cloth could be another option)


- Bergamo: Recently conquered by Venice, Bergamo was always separate from Brescia and in the Middle Ages ruled over a sizable territory. It was nestled on a hilltop and surrounded by enormous walls. Today it’s the second biggest city in Lombardy, though it was still sizable at the time. The province includes Bergamo, it’s mountain valleys and hinterland.

Province: Bergamo
Capital: Bergamo
Ownership & Cores: Venice (Cores: Milan)
Culture: Lombard
Area: Eastern Lombardy
Dev: 5/4/4 (total: 13)
Terrain: Hills
Tradegood: Iron (was extracted from the Alps and worked in the city)

Why Bergamo? The city was quite important and wealthy, it warrants it’s own province.


- Brescia: Like Bergamo, recently conquered by Venice. One of the biggest cities of Lombardy, it would flourish under Venice until Napoleon. The province includes Brescia and Valcamonica.

Province: Brescia
Capital: Brescia
Ownership & Cores: Venice (Cores: Milan)
Culture: Lombard
Area: Eastern Lombardy
Dev: 7/7/4 (total: 18)
Terrain: Hills
Tradegood: Cloth


- Mantova: Ruled by the Gonzaga family, Mantova would diplomatically play its cards between Venice and Milan for many centuries, sometimes allying with one or the other. They would remain independent until 1708.

Province: Mantova
Capital: Mantova
Ownership & Cores: Mantua
Culture: Lombard
Area: Eastern Lombardy
Dev: 9/8/4 (total: 21)
Terrain: Farmland
Tradegood: Livestock


But why not these other provinces?

There have been other suggestions on the region, and here I’m going to touch on the reasoning on why I didn’t put them in:

Ticino: Only reason why it would be mentioned is that it was conquered and held by the Swiss from 1502-1512 (the conquest was gradual, as it was not a single administrative entity). A province could be carved out, but it would have low dev (around 6 total) and it would mainly be added for sake of historical borders. The nearby province of Como was a lot more important.

Valtellina: I wouldn’t actually be opposed to a province that went from Como to Sudtirol, flanked by both sides by wasteland. It would have interesting gameplay options and the valley has an interesting history, being conquered by the Swiss for nearly 3 centuries. The province would be quite low dev thought (around 5 total, with Livestock), but if the dev would see it fit in I would support it.

Alessandria: Alessandria would be a good pick if there was space for it. If a province can be squeezed between Pavia and Montferrat it would be a good pick (thought Pavia was both bigger, more influential and more populated then Alessandria). The problem is, is there space for it?

Less serious suggestions would be Crema, as it was a Venetian exclave in Milan, and Lodi in the province of Cremona.


Emilia & Novara

Milan didn’t own all of Emilia, but it did own two important cities: Parma and Piacenza. The first is already in the game, as it would, later on, have its own duchy. However in 1444 Piacenza was the biggest city of the two. Because of this, I decided to split the province in two.

- Parma would see it’s development drop from 16 to 12.


- Piacenza then should be added:

Province: Piacenza
Capital: Piacenza
Ownership & Cores: Milan (Cores: Parma)
Culture: Romagnan
Area: Emilia
Dev: 5/5/3 (total: 13)
Terrain: Hills
Tradegood: Grain

- Novara

With the addition of Pavia, Novara would lose most of its dev to it, going from (7-7-5) to 4-3-3, as it was quite a small city.


Rivers and Lakes

Lombardy is a region of rivers and lakes: the most important being Lago Maggiore, Lago di Como, and Lago di Garda. While certainly not mandatory, it would give a nice flavor to the area. Also, two important rivers are missing: the Adda and Mincio.
Lombardy - rivers.PNG

The Ambrosian Republic

While this post is for map changes, I’ll still link my suggestion for the Ambrosian Republic as i is terribly ahistorical. In my suggestion some values are balanced and there is a chance to see Francesco Sforza rise as the new Duke, instead of having an ahistorical, two-century-long republic.

Link to thread: https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/foru...-repubblica-ambrosiana.1064306/#post-23688666


Obligatory tag for @neondt
 
Last edited:
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Upvote 0
Very nice looking map! :D

I'm happy to have been a inspiration for this thread!

The Parma/Piacenza split is wonderful, and it will also piece togethere very nicely with my Central Italian Suggestion, since the Emilian State would grow to 4 provinces to make it more of a presence.

It's also worth noting that a buffer province between Switzerland and Milan is necessary, since in too many games the Swiss just move one province and conquer Milan.

I hope it will be all implemented, especially that awesome proposal for the Ambrosian Republic Event. It's one of the first thread I read when I first got into this forum, so it has a sepcial place in my heart. It also represent the political situation in a very detailed way and that is the level of detail I want to be observed in the Italian Peninsula after this mega-European update.
 
I like it so much :)
Except the Piacenza province I myself would recommend them all, but with Piacenza we could have a separate Emilia, and Romagna (there could be an added Ravenna and maybe
Rimini).

The only thing that i would like some change, is the border of Como, to resemble more the border.
switzerland-historical-development-old-map_u-l-pn0e1q0.jpg
 
Last edited:
I would do exactly same map there. And development spread is also very nice I think!
Thing to note is that Novara should be moved from Piedmont to Western Lombardy state. Just like Milan, Como and Pavia, Western Lombardy language dialects were/are spoken there!

Western Lombardy
  • Milan
  • Pavia
  • Novara
  • Como

Eastern Lombardy
  • Brescia
  • Cremona
  • Bergamo
  • Mantova

Emilia
  • Piacenza
  • Parma
  • ...
  • ...
 
Thanks for the support guys.

I hope it will be all implemented, especially that awesome proposal for the Ambrosian Republic Event. It's one of the first thread I read when I first got into this forum, so it has a sepcial place in my heart. It also represent the political situation in a very detailed way and that is the level of detail I want to be observed in the Italian Peninsula after this mega-European update.

That warmed my heart <3

I like it so much :)
Except the Piacenza province I myself would recommend them all, but with Piacenza we could have a separate Emilia, and Romagna (there could be an added Ravenna and maybe
Rimini).

The only thing that i would like some change, is the border of Como, to resemble more the border.

For the redrawing of Como, the province of Ticino or Levantina (capital Bellinzona) should be added. I might quickly sketch it up tomorrow to see how it fits.

Was thinking to also tweak Piemonte, might look into that the next days
 
I like it so much :)
Except the Piacenza province I myself would recommend them all, but with Piacenza we could have a separate Emilia, and Romagna (there could be an added Ravenna and maybe
Rimini).

The only thing that i would like some change, is the border of Como, to resemble more the border.
(picture)

So I quickly redraw the border of Como, adding Valtellina and Ticino. Also added Alessandria just to see how crowded it would be. Opinions?

Lombardy-2.png
 
So I quickly redraw the border of Como, adding Valtellina and Ticino. Also added Alessandria just to see how crowded it would be. Opinions?

View attachment 443570
Seems that these provinces would be a bit too small to be clickable, not to mention quite crowded. I personally think a more conservative approach like the OP would work better. But hey those are just my thoughts and you're entitled to your own of course. ;)
 
Seems that these provinces would be a bit too small to be clickable, not to mention quite crowded. I personally think a more conservative approach like the OP would work better. But hey those are just my thoughts and you're entitled to your own of course. ;)

Yeah I agree with you, definitely too crowded.
 
Not bad. Novara certainly needs a split. Not sure we need Piacenza however.

Seems that these provinces would be a bit too small to be clickable, not to mention quite crowded. I personally think a more conservative approach like the OP would work better. But hey those are just my thoughts and you're entitled to your own of course. ;)

Agreed.
 
Como and Ticino both would be too much.
I think it could be Como, if owned by Milan, and Ticino if Switzerland.
Capital Lugano/Como, which are pretty close to each other.

There's my version of the region:
18563488cd9803f14ca6b985b0d28adcd99a202167f7f3b5d5dc475e0fe45e1a4e91d364.jpg

(Red dots are the capital of new provinces and Brescia)
So I added:
-Saluzzo (could be an independent tag)
-Aosta (could have Occitan/Arpitan culture)
-Pavia (second most important ton of the Duchy of Milan)
-Lugano (Milan and Switzerland fought over it)
-Bergamo (to split the currently too big Brescia)
-Padua (important town of Venice)
-Ravenna (Romagna changes to Bologna and could be an independent tag, Ravenna is owned by Venice)

What I wouldn't add:
-Massa (sadly would be too small next to also too small Lucca)
-Rimini (could be between Urbino and Ravenna)
-Alessandria (Pavia was just more important)
-Valtellina (why of course could be interesting, its too weird for me)
-Piacenza (while Parma could be divided, I'm not sure it's that necessary)
-Piombino (way tooo small)

some useful maps:
http://www.historiafaentina.it/Storia Medioevale/Foto/repubblica_venezia_espansione.png
https://images-wixmp-ed30a86b8c4ca8...322j-ac2aabc6-9ffb-4f6b-9e28-1029a5272783.png

But in the end, Paradox will decide, what they think of all these provinces of course :)

Keep up the good work guys!
 
Last edited:
Romagna changes to Bologna and could be an independent tag

Bologna wouldn’t fit as an Independent Nation, nor it would fit as a mere vassal. A new type of subject must be created to represent Bologna (and also Urbino) and also some states in Europe.
 
Bologna wouldn’t fit as an Independent Nation, nor it would fit as a mere vassal. A new type of subject must be created to represent Bologna (and also Urbino) and also some states in Europe.

Bologna was place of heavy power struggles at the time, I think it could be represented as an independent nation in 1444.

Also I feel like this thread is also not the place to discuss possible new subject types, even though I agree that system could also be polished.
 
Also I feel like this thread is also not the place to discuss possible new subject types, even though I agree that system could also be polished.

Yes, this discussion does not belong here. If you scroll up I attached a link of my last thread. In that thread, there is also a discussion on how to represent semi-Independent subjects such as the Papal subjects in the Renaissance (In part 4 if I recall correctly) and then also there my proposal for Romagna which features, obviously, Bologna. If you want to discuss this topic, let’s discuss it there.
 
Yes, this discussion does not belong here. If you scroll up I attached a link of my last thread. In that thread, there is also a discussion on how to represent semi-Independent subjects such as the Papal subjects in the Renaissance (In part 4 if I recall correctly) and then also there my proposal for Romagna which features, obviously, Bologna. If you want to discuss this topic, let’s discuss it there.

I've seen your suggestion.
And I just don't agree with adding more type of subjects and stuff like that. I think the vassal system could be reworked (including tributary, which is not even a real subject), but that would need a separate thread, do not flood this one with less connected stuff (subject types are pretty far from "a look to the map of Lombardy").
But that's just my two cents, feel free to add anything, my point is, in this thread we should workout changes to the current form of the game.
 
Piemonte
Piemonte

- I'm 100% for Saluzzo, it had an interesting role in the power game between Savoy and France, definitely a challenging start.
- I'm not too hot for Aosta, as it has the same problem of Valtellina. It does have a strong historical basis to be in the game, however.
- I would love to see Asti in the game as it was an Orleanese (yes, the dukes in France) exclave for some time, but sadly there is no space as Monferrat is in the way.

Two changes I would like to propose are:

- Rename Cuneo to Mondovì. Cuneo was a minor city under Savoy, while Mondovì was both bigger in population and the Savoyards built a university there.
- Rename Albenga (in Liguria) to Savona, definitely the second most important city in Liguria after Genova.

- Also, back to my original suggestion, I think a fort should be added to Como, to represent the fortified city of Bellinzona in Ticino. Bellinzona barred the pass between Italy and Switzerland with it's 3 castles and walls from one end to the other of the valley.
 
Also, back to my original suggestion, I think a fort should be added to Como, to represent the fortified city of Bellinzona in Ticino. Bellinzona barred the pass between Italy and Switzerland with it's 3 castles and walls from one end to the other of the valley.

That would be of extreme relevance, since both Switzerland and Milan have mountain forts and the first cannot easily invade the latter. 100% for this change. It also is a money-sink for Milan, which starts quite rich.

I'm not too hot for Aosta, as it has the same problem of Valtellina. It does have a strong historical basis to be in the game, however.

A province or a link is needed between Savoy and Turin. It makes no sense that if Switzerland gains its cores back then Savoy is cut open in two separated part.